Hyper Dimensional Design

[The Man]

Well, in simple words than:

Accurate words would be preferable.

You have a sun and planets. I talk about the time it takes to complete a full orbit around the sun

Exactly what I said, you simply “talk about” sidereal periods, no other orbital aspects, certainly nothing “internal” and no “harmonics” either, my words were indeed accurate.

 

[Dutch]

Not good enough dutch, because every day something happens in space.

you see deliberate manmade impacts in space every day?

expressing Phi?

and even Pi with one of these 3 impacts aswel?

Well,

give me a daily update than

 

[Dutch]

I have masses of co-incidences with my earthquake and volcano data, and look what happens, there's tsunami and earthquakes all over the place.

I don't like that, many people killed and hurt. If I could use this information to predict where the next one will happen, we could warn everyone.

What do you think Dutch?
You have masses of data, what have you concluded from it?

What's that Deep Impact thing?
I hope it's not a Day of Reckoning or something like that.
I'd hate it if those religious types turned out to be right.

but Mxyzptlk.......you really don't read do you.

How could you have missed the expectations in relation to San Andreas that were posted recently? can't waste my time on this

 

[Dutch]

Uhm, even in astrology “a grand cross” is “determined by orbital positions”. As I asked before, by all means please, define this “something completely different”.

uh?

astrological grand cross is created by planet positions

orbital grand cross in HDdesign is created on Earth's orbital positions only

get it now?

 

[Dutch]

you simply “talk about” sidereal periods, no other orbital aspects

indeed as explained several times in this thread

 

[AWPrime]

you see deliberate manmade impacts in space every day?

Collisions with space debris and satellites re-entering the atmosphere happen every day. Both can be viewed as impacts.

give me a daily update than

And you don't you just stop being so lazy?

orbital grand cross in HDdesign is created on Earth's orbital positions only

And here is another example of your laziness. You don't take enough effort to even properly name a term. In my opinion you should be ashamed of yourself.

 

[dafydd]

indeed as explained several times in this thread

You have your own definition of ''explained'' too.

 

[Paul]

astrological grand cross is created by planet positions

Obviously, it involves an imposed relationship of orbiting planets.

orbital grand cross in HDdesign is created on Earth's orbital positions only

Being a cross it must involve at least 3 other planets.

get it now?

Perhaps if you explained the following:

What do you mean by the term orbital grand cross?
Why do you think it has any importance?
Why does it have to involve earth?
Describe the latest grand cross in terms of the planets and their positions on the cross.

 

[Paul]

can't waste my time on this

If you really wanted people to understand something you claim is so vital, you would spend as much time as you had to. It can't be very important if you give up every-time someone asks a question you don't want to answer.

 

[The Man]

indeed as explained several times in this thread

So your assertion...

...that HDDesign is based on the internal orbital harmonics of our solarsystem...

...was just a load of horse hockey.

 

[The Man]

First you have to read the posts on this page about Deep Impact / Epoxi spaceship expressing Pi in space:

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=7585&mforum=hddesign#7585

and followed by this:

In a few days from now we will again experience a Deep Impact in space, on October 9, 2009 :
"On June 18, 2009, NASA launched this new "double mission" -- a SUV-sized spacecraft called "Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter" (LRO), designed to map the entire lunar surface in unprecedented detail over the next five years (and, several times); and, a "piggy-back" spacecraft, called the "Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite" (LCROSS), designed to direct the spent upper stage of the Atlas 5 LRO launch vehicle (the "Centaur" second stage) into a carefully targeted impact with the lunar surface on October 9, 2009. "
First thought in relation to this Impact on the moon is of course the Deep Impact on comet Templ I on July 4, 2005.
July 4, 2005 - October 9, 2009 = 1.558 days
Phi point at 1.558 / 1,61803399 = 963 days
is February 21, 2008
with an impact in space:
U.S. Satellite Shootdown
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/satellites/us-satellite-shootdown-the-inside-story
Sources: Navy to shoot down failed satellite Thursday February 21
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/02/18/satellite.intercept/index.html
So we have 3 impacts in space, all manmade: Temple I, satellite and Moon.
expressing the Golden Mean Phi
So now we have both Pi and Phi expressed in space in relation to the Deep Impact mission.
It should make you think why The Golden Mean is expressed this way. These 3 events are manmade so the communication is 'outgoing'.
This lunar impact is intelligently determined
the question is, is NASA doing this consciously and if so: to who are they talking than?
if NASA is doing this without intent, just 'by coincidence' expressing both Pi and Phi in space with this Deep Impact mission, than its an unmistaken indication of hidden underlying Design in our reality.
If the first is true than we have to understand that there has been an 'incoming' communication too expressing the Golden
Mean Phi in relation to Deep Impact: with these markers:
The use of nuclear weapons ( hirhoshima- Nagasaki) and the Tunguska event.
NASA's 'communication' with this lunar impact is either a rather 'violent'
message with these impacts in space or even 'hostile' if the 'communication' is consciously planned.
Q4 2009 Timeline, October, November and December 2009
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about386-hddesign.html

Your information on the mission timeline is out of date by at least a year.

http://epoxi.umd.edu/1mission/index.shtml

6. Earth Flybys - In mid-2008, TCM 12 was performed putting the spacecraft on an alternate (better!) trajectory to Hartley 2. The revised trajectory modified the remaining flybys and added two. The second was on 29 Dec 2008. A more distant flyby occured 29 Jun 2009 and a second distant flyby is scheduled 28 Dec 2009. The final Earth Flyby occurs 27 June 2010. Each flyby may include a pair of Trajectory Correction Maneuvers.

TCM stands for Trajectory Correction Maneuver (in simpler words the spacecraft’s trajectory has been changed) thus changing the projected Hartley 2 encounter date.

8. Encounter Phase - Most of the comet-science data is collected in the encounter phase which begins in late October 2010. A final targeting maneuver may be executed shortly after the phase begins. The trajectory is chosen in such a way that there is always light on the solar panels. Unlike the approach trajectory chosen for the Tempel 1 encounter, the flyby spacecraft does not come close enough to need the protection of its meteoroid shields. After closest approach on November 4, 2010, a 21-day period for look back observations is planned. Data gathering in the encounter phase supports the comet science goals in the following activities:

So what “communication” do you think NASA is trying to send now, other than simply “please pay attention to mission changes Dutch”

 

[Mxyzptlk]

but Mxyzptlk.......you really don't read do you.

How could you have missed the expectations in relation to San Andreas that were posted recently? can't waste my time on this

I do read, Dutch. You imply that your stuff is easy, but it's not. It's very hard to follow sometimes. And I don't seem to be getting the whole picture which is why I ask questions.
I just thought if you had some general conclusions as to what it means it would help understand.
My mum says it's all a waste of time and that you just make it up as you go along, and I've got nothing with which to counter her argument.
Sorry to take up your time, but I don't think you should spend so much of it discussing orbits and crosses with those dunces here. If they can't get it they should just get back to matmatics school!

 

[Dutch]

Collisions with space debris and satellites re-entering the atmosphere happen every day. Both can be viewed as impacts.

and these are deliberate manmade impacts in space? this is just silly

 

[Dutch]

And you don't you just stop being so lazy?

which means?

 

[Dutch]

"orbital grand cross in HDdesign is created on Earth's orbital positions only"
And here is another example of your laziness. You don't take enough effort to even properly name a term. In my opinion you should be ashamed of yourself.

So can you name an orbital grand cross in HDDesign properly than?
I don't see the problem here

 

[Dutch]

Being a cross it must involve at least 3 other planets.

It has nothing to do with other planets....

why don't you scroll back a bit here and read again. This is about a grand cross created by earth's orbital positions only

 

[Dutch]

If you really wanted people to understand something you claim is so vital, you would spend as much time as you had to. It can't be very important if you give up every-time someone asks a question you don't want to answer.

I'm quite patient with some of you guys but I don't think not everybody is doing the research, nor do they actually try to understand it. Some of you just read a post and start making remarks. its useless

 

[Dutch]

Your information on the mission timeline is out of date by at least a year.

We have already discussed this here specifically, do I have to look it up for you are are you able yourselves?

 

[Dutch]

So what “communication” do you think NASA is trying to send now, other than simply “please pay attention to mission changes Dutch”

That NASA was initially 'communicating' pi for them known reasons

 

[Dutch]

I do read, Dutch. You imply that your stuff is easy, but it's not. It's very hard to follow sometimes. And I don't seem to be getting the whole picture which is why I ask questions.
I just thought if you had some general conclusions as to what it means it would help understand.
My mum says it's all a waste of time and that you just make it up as you go along, and I've got nothing with which to counter her argument.
Sorry to take up your time, but I don't think you should spend so much of it discussing orbits and crosses with those dunces here. If they can't get it they should just get back to matmatics school!

Well , it certainly isn't easy, especially if you haven't experienced these initial 'synchronities' or 'coincidences' like I experienced when I logged this material. I don't know your mum but I'm sure she will change her mind over time, that is if she reaaly tries to understand this. People have to do that themselves by reading and following how this material emerges, take notice of the timing of postings etc. You can't make this up if you go along, not in a way I do. You could have a few lucky shots maybe, but not continuously. In HDDesign these synchronicities and coincedences pop up all the time. I am willing to invest my time to try to explain to those who show they rally are working on it