Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

Dutch,when will the next major earthquake occur in Southern California? Tokyo?
Anywhere? Give us a date.

if you just read you would notice it is already given

now tell me, able to pick it up or do I have to help you?

 

[Dutch]

never mind

 

[Dutch]

"Simple nonsense even by astrology standards (and that says a lot). A grand cross is an alignment as seen from the Earth and thus depends on the synodic periods of the bodies in the oppositions."

this is not the same as astrology, this alignment however is a marker of Earths orbital position at the time of this alignment.


"That is how a grand cross is “created with Earth's orbital positions”. The Sidereal period of Mercury is 87.969 earth days, however its Synodic period is 115.88 days. "

an astrological grand cross or an orbital grand cross is something different, you completely disregard the 'translation' into 2 different systems.
I talk about real orbits, how they correlate to our perception of time, synodic has always been out of the question, its irrelevant in HDDesign.

The man again:

“The second 'marker' was the planetary alignment of May 5, 2000 so the last 2 orbital positions of the Grand Cross on Earth's orbit could be calculated:” also is simple nonsense even by astrology standards (and that again says a lot). A planetary alignment is, well, when the planets are aligned and not in opposition as in a grand cross."

Again you are making the same error, you fail to see that HDDesign is based on the internal orbital harmonics of our solarsystem, this HDDesign may look like astrology to your limited perspective, but it truly is something different

"At least astrology deals with and in the 3 dimensional geometry of orbital positions."

I agree, but you have to think further than that in order to understand HDDesign


"Your design hype is just a cheap, flat, one dimensional, post hoc knock off of astrology. You take the vague predictive claims and some terminology from astrology while abandoning the only accurate part of astrology, the actual use of orbital relations to calculate conjunctions."

This is just the man talking about something he doesn't understand. Set aside your knowledge about astrology, you have to think differently in order to understand


"So, no Dutch you certainly aren’t doing astrology"

you see? its a beginning


", you come nowhere close to even that standard."

I don't want to, HDDesign is far more fundamental, if not the ultimate essence.


"What you are doing is just a simple cheap one dimensional knock off as your own version of astrology, apparently just because the calculations are easier for you. As surprising as it may seem Dutch makes astrologers seem like astronomers by comparison."

yes the man, astrologers seem like astronomers compared to HDdesign, they are one step behind so to speak

 

[mike3]

Question 1:

What evidence do you have for your "theory"? You say not to expect "scientific" proof but what about any proof? Do you have ANYthing that would imply there is something real here?

Question 2:

Define your terms. You said something about "changing the 'energy' involved". What is this energy? How do you know it exists? You said something about the reality becoming more "subtle". What does that mean?

 

[Dutch]

Question 1:

What evidence do you have for your "theory"? You say not to expect "scientific" proof but what about any proof? Do you have ANYthing that would imply there is something real here?

To me it is unmistakenly clear, that even without the direct synchronistical 'confirmations' that occur constantly while working with this material ( in a way that I am experiencing it ), the investigator would come to the conclusion after analysing whay has been said, when it has been said and the context given, that it is impossible that its just a story what's being told here. IT CANNOT BE JUST A COINCIDENCE.,
not to this extend and repeatedly, unexpectedly and always with a sense of connectedness.

Question 2:

"Define your terms. You said something about "changing the 'energy' involved". What is this energy? How do you know it exists? You said something about the reality becoming more "subtle". What does that mean?"
go read first I would say, I think there could be alot of terms that I use that need to be understood. With 'energy ' I mean the creative power between consciousness and matter

"subtle" in the most obvious way is the creation for instance of a new geyser at yellowstone. the opposite ( in potention ) would be the creation of a new super volcano. this analogy is aplicable for every underlying theme we have to deal with

 

[Little 10 Toes]

OMG!
as you can see on the timeline of Q2 2010 I have added 2 underlying themes for June 26, 2010. From that timeline:

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=8131&mforum=hddesign#8131
After I ( cross )posted my previous post about the Grand Cross/ Sumatra quake/Tsunami etc. I decided to check BBC for the latest news and look at this synchronicity:´
Its really ´in the face´ :
Wednesday, 30 September 2009
Earthquakes weaken distant faults
The major 2004 earthquake in Sumatra may have weakened the San Andreas fault, 8,000km away in California.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8283873.stm

So you'll count a hit since one earthquake "may" (you're quoting it, not me) weaken the San Andreas fault, but you totally miss a second major quake.

 

[The Man]

this is not the same as astrology, this alignment however is a marker of Earths orbital position at the time of this alignment.

Certianly not the same as astrology, astrology can actually predict something like conjunctions, your dimensional design hype can’t even do that. Again a grand cross is two oppositions not an alignment.

an astrological grand cross or an orbital grand cross is something different, you completely disregard the 'translation' into 2 different systems.

Oh by all means please define your “orbital grand cross” that “is something different” and specifically the “2 different systems” to which you are referring.

I talk about real orbits, how they correlate to our perception of time, synodic has always been out of the question, its irrelevant in HDDesign.

No you just talk about sidereal periods which are already correlated “to our perception of time” (that is why they are called periods) and synoptic periods are actually relevant to real orbits.

Again you are making the same error, you fail to see that HDDesign is based on the internal orbital harmonics of our solarsystem,

I have made no error as you have utilized nothing “internal” (whatever you think that is suppose to mean) or anything concerning “harmonics” (I doubt you really understand what that word means).

this HDDesign may look like astrology to your limited perspective, but it truly is something different

No it just looks like your post hoc fantasies, as I have said.

I agree, but you have to think further than that in order to understand HDDesign

As I said what you do is entirely transparent, no one need to look or think any further to see that it is just a text book example of a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy and fantasy.

This is just the man talking about something he doesn't understand. Set aside your knowledge about astrology, you have to think differently in order to understand

Apparently I understand it better then you, both the technical and even astrological terms your try to use as well as the one dimensional geometry you try to pawn off as being something other then simply one dimensional.

you see? its a beginning

Well being more useless then astrology certainly gives you no direction to go but up.

I don't want to, HDDesign is far more fundamental, if not the ultimate essence.

So you intend it to be more “fundamental” garbage then astrology, at least now we know that the stench from your “ultimate essence” was intentional

yes the man, astrologers seem like astronomers compared to HDdesign, they are one step behind so to speak

When you are turned around backwards everyone seems like they are behind you.

 

[Paul]

this is not the same as astrology, this alignment however is a marker of Earths orbital position at the time of this alignment.

Would you prefer astromancy to astrology?

an astrological grand cross or an orbital grand cross is something different

Are you making up your own definitions again?

you completely disregard the 'translation' into 2 different systems.

You completely fail to make any sense.

I talk about real orbits, how they correlate to our perception of time

Yep, absolutely no sense at all.

Again you are making the same error, you fail to see that HDDesign is based on the internal orbital harmonics of our solarsystem

I though it was based on your magic multidimensions shapeless solids.

What does internal orbital harmonics mean?

 

[Paul]

So you intend it to be more “fundamental” garbage then astrology, at least now we know that the stench from your “ultimate essence” was intentional

You are a very naughty The Man.

 

[Paul]

To me it is unmistakenly clear

Not evidence.

that even without the direct synchronistical 'confirmations' that occur constantly while working with this material

Misuse of terms and apparently a new definition for confirmation.

( in a way that I am experiencing it )

Completely useless for anyone who is not you and not interested in unconfirmed anecdotes.

the investigator would come to the conclusion after analysing whay has been said, when it has been said and the context given, that it is impossible that its just a story what's being told here.

Precisely the conclusion being reached by quite a number of people.

IT CANNOT BE JUST A COINCIDENCE

Only if you intend to redefine cannot as well.

go read first I would say, I think there could be alot of terms that I use that need to be understood. With 'energy ' I mean the creative power between consciousness and matter

It would help a lot if you didn't keep making up meanings, using them without telling anyone and then combining that with terms you do not understand.

To repeat the previous unanswered question, how do you know your energy exists?


bolding mine

 

[Dutch]

So you'll count a hit since one earthquake "may" (you're quoting it, not me) weaken the San Andreas fault, but you totally miss a second major quake.

you are completely missing the essence here. read first.

Its the striking 'coicidence' that I had already linked the San Andreas fault for the Grand Cross future date around june 26, 2010 ( just read, its all here ). for around september 29 I expected a confirmation of the hidden underlying design ( grand cross orbital positions ).

You have to understand that these synchronicities seem to 'confirm' that we indeed have to deal with the san andreas fault around june 26

Its unbelievable that you can't pick that up, unless you just don't read

 

[Dutch]

Certianly not the same as astrology, astrology can actually predict something like conjunctions, your dimensional design hype can’t even do that. Again a grand cross is two oppositions not an alignment.

sigh.......

of course it is in astrology, a grand cross determined by orbital positions in HDDesign is something completely different. Does astrology make it possible to make exact predictions? If you really investigate this material you will understand that HDDesign is far more powerfull

 

[Dutch]

I have made no error as you have utilized nothing “internal” (whatever you think that is suppose to mean) or anything concerning “harmonics” (I doubt you really understand what that word means).

Well, in simple words than:

You have a sun and planets. I talk about the time it takes to complete a full orbit around the sun

 

[dafydd]

you are completely missing the essence here. read first.

Its the striking 'coicidence' that I had already linked the San Andreas fault for the Grand Cross future date around june 26, 2010 ( just read, its all here ). for around september 29 I expected a confirmation of the hidden underlying design ( grand cross orbital positions ).

You have to understand that these synchronicities seem to 'confirm' that we indeed have to deal with the san andreas fault around june 26

Its unbelievable that you can't pick that up, unless you just don't read

There may be an earthquake caused by the San Andreas fault? Who would have thought it?

 

[AWPrime]

sigh.......

of course it is in astrology, a grand cross determined by orbital positions in HDDesign is something completely different.

Then make your own terms and stop misusing existing ones. Nobody will ever take you serious, until you start doing some serious work.

Does astrology make it possible to make exact predictions? If you really investigate this material you will understand that HDDesign is far more powerfull

You don't even make exact predictions.

 

[Dutch]

First you have to read the posts on this page about Deep Impact / Epoxi spaceship expressing Pi in space:

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=7585&mforum=hddesign#7585

Read carefully,
this is so profound....when intuition speaks:
Deep Impact on comet Temple I happened on July 4, 2005
Deep Impact/Epoxi - Moon - Earth Transit happened at ascension starttriggerdate of the end of the Mayan Calendar, on May 29, 2008.
next scheduled Deep Impact/Epoxi spacecraft flyby of comet Hartley 2: October 11, 2010.
As we have seen in previous posts and on the timeline, this May 29, 2008 timeframe of the Transit had a big emphasis on Pi, unveiling the correlations between Pi, ascension timframe, orbital positions, Deep Impact and the end of the Mayan Calendar
Wouldn't it be an unmistaken confirmation to find Pi expressed by these three events in space: Deep Impact on Temple I, the Epoxi - moon - Earth transit and the comet Hartley 2 flyby?
Wouldn't you think that if a Pi connection is there, it would be an unmistaken indication of hidden underlying Intelligent Design?
fasten year seatbelt: Pi IS expressed by these Deep Impact events:
Timeframe Deep Impact on comet Temple I - comet Hartley flyby / Pi
is the same as:
Pi * difference between:
Deep Impact on Temple I - Epoxi / Moon / Eart Transit
and
Epoxii / Moom / Earth Transit - comet Hartly flyby
or in numbers:
July 4, 2005 ( Deep Impact Temple I) - October 11, 2010 ( comet hartley flyby of spacecraft Deep Impact/Epoxi) = 1925 days rounded
July 4, 2005 - May 29, 2008 Epoxi - Moon transit = 1060 days rounded
May 29, 2008 Epoxi/moon/Earth Transit - October 11, 2010 comet Hartly flyby = 865 days rounded
The difference between 1060 and 865 is 195 days
1925 / Pi = 195 * Pi
or
1925 / Pi / Pi is the difference between the timeframes from the Epoxi/moon/Earth Transit and the 2 Deep Ipact spacecraft events!!
This is so beautiful and fundamental.

and followed by this:

So Nasa seems to choose the Transits as 'communication' marker.
We have just seen the Pi connection expressed by the Deep Impact/ Epoxi spacecraft -Moon-Earth Transit and the 2 comet encounters with Temple I and Hartlet, on May 29, 2008,
You can call this an 'artificial' transit with Deep Impact taking these awsome Transit images.
Deep Impact and Transits.......
expressing Pi on May 29, 2008.....
Deep Impact was launched on January 12, 2005
That was during another Transit......
and also here we have a camera out there in space to watch....
Transit of Mercury from Mars
A transit of Mercury across the Sun as seen from Mars takes place when the planet Mercury passes directly between the Sun and Mars, obscuring a small part of the Sun's disc for an observer on Mars. During a transit, Mercury can be seen from Mars as a small black disc moving across the face of the Sun.
taking pictures or 'communicating'?
The Mars Rovers Spirit and Opportunity could have observed the transit on January 12, 2005 (from 14:45 UTC to 23:05 UTC); however the only camera available for this had insufficient resolution. Ephemeris data generated by JPL Horizons indicates that Opportunity would be able to observe the transit from the start until local sunset at about 19:23 UTC, while Spirit would be able to observe it from local sunrise at about 19:38 UTC until the end of the transit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit_of_Mercury_from_Mars
Well you might think...... 2 of these Transits.....its all just a coincidence.....who cares?......let's sleep a night and forget about it, tomorrow a next day.......
January 13, 2005
What's the news today?
are you kidding, another Transit?
Transit of Earth from Saturn
A transit of Earth across the Sun as seen from Saturn takes place when the planet Earth passes directly between the Sun and Saturn, obscuring a small part of the Sun's disc for an observer on Saturn. During a transit, Earth can be seen from Saturn as a small black disc moving across the face of the sun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit_of_Earth_from_Saturn
Well, I hear you thinking...... that's far away and it happens maybe 4 times in a century or so, and ofcourse we are not present this time.
No?
Yes!
Naturally, no one has ever seen a transit of Earth from Saturn, nor is this likely to happen in any foreseeable future. The last one took place on January 13-14, 2005 -- though the Cassini probe was present in the Saturn system, it was also the day of the Huygens probe mission.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit_of_Earth_from_Saturn
Huygens separated from the Cassini orbiter on December 25, 2004, and landed on Titan on January 14, 2005 near the Xanadu region.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huygens_probe
It touched down on land during the Transit
unfortunately also here no pictures........again....( what a fool believes....)
Furthermore, the angular resolution needed to capture the occultation was near the limits of Cassini's imaging subsystem, to say nothing of the concerns of pointing the probe's camera directly at the Sun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit_of_Earth_from_Saturn
Oh, and its all just a coincidence ofcourse...........

In a few days from now we will again experience a Deep Impact in space, on October 9, 2009 :
"On June 18, 2009, NASA launched this new "double mission" -- a SUV-sized spacecraft called "Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter" (LRO), designed to map the entire lunar surface in unprecedented detail over the next five years (and, several times); and, a "piggy-back" spacecraft, called the "Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite" (LCROSS), designed to direct the spent upper stage of the Atlas 5 LRO launch vehicle (the "Centaur" second stage) into a carefully targeted impact with the lunar surface on October 9, 2009. "
First thought in relation to this Impact on the moon is of course the Deep Impact on comet Templ I on July 4, 2005.
July 4, 2005 - October 9, 2009 = 1.558 days
Phi point at 1.558 / 1,61803399 = 963 days
is February 21, 2008
with an impact in space:
U.S. Satellite Shootdown
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/satellites/us-satellite-shootdown-the-inside-story
Sources: Navy to shoot down failed satellite Thursday February 21
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/02/18/satellite.intercept/index.html
So we have 3 impacts in space, all manmade: Temple I, satellite and Moon.
expressing the Golden Mean Phi
So now we have both Pi and Phi expressed in space in relation to the Deep Impact mission.
It should make you think why The Golden Mean is expressed this way. These 3 events are manmade so the communication is 'outgoing'.
This lunar impact is intelligently determined
the question is, is NASA doing this consciously and if so: to who are they talking than?
if NASA is doing this without intent, just 'by coincidence' expressing both Pi and Phi in space with this Deep Impact mission, than its an unmistaken indication of hidden underlying Design in our reality.
If the first is true than we have to understand that there has been an 'incoming' communication too expressing the Golden
Mean Phi in relation to Deep Impact: with these markers:
The use of nuclear weapons ( hirhoshima- Nagasaki) and the Tunguska event.
NASA's 'communication' with this lunar impact is either a rather 'violent'
message with these impacts in space or even 'hostile' if the 'communication' is consciously planned.
Q4 2009 Timeline, October, November and December 2009
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about386-hddesign.html

 

[AWPrime]

Not good enough dutch, because every day something happens in space.

 

[Mxyzptlk]

I have masses of co-incidences with my earthquake and volcano data, and look what happens, there's tsunami and earthquakes all over the place.

I don't like that, many people killed and hurt. If I could use this information to predict where the next one will happen, we could warn everyone.

What do you think Dutch?
You have masses of data, what have you concluded from it?

What's that Deep Impact thing?
I hope it's not a Day of Reckoning or something like that.
I'd hate it if those religious types turned out to be right.

 

[The Man]

You are a very naughty The Man.

Thanks Paul, it is nice to be recognized for ones talents.

 

[The Man]

sigh.......

of course it is in astrology, a grand cross determined by orbital positions in HDDesign is something completely different. Does astrology make it possible to make exact predictions? If you really investigate this material you will understand that HDDesign is far more powerfull

Uhm, even in astrology “a grand cross” is “determined by orbital positions”. As I asked before, by all means please, define this “something completely different”. Also as I said before and you quoted…

...astrology can actually predict something like conjunctions, your dimensional design hype can’t even do that.