Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
What does the term "terrain hugging cruise missile" mean to you?
Desperation, on your part.
What does the term "terrain hugging cruise missile" mean to you?
Desperation, on your part.
I'm curious what it means to you. How low do you think they fly?
Are they related to tree hugging granola eaters?What does the term "terrain hugging cruise missile" mean to you?
Are they related to tree hugging granola eaters?
Terrain hugging? Nothing?
It means flying close to the terrain so as to better avoid detection, as described in the video by Susan McElwain, and as described in the numerous documents to which I have linked describing their capabilities.
How did they shoot the missile not in the inventory? lolIt means flying close to the terrain so as to better avoid detection, as described in the video by Susan McElwain, and as described in the numerous documents to which I have linked describing their capabilities.
Your jet theory would be great if it was possible for a jet to disappear into the ground, which if it did occur you should be able to demonstrate. I have provided a better explanation for the crater, but you haven't even tried.
You just wish you'd thought of it. The ground wasn't chewed up so that leaves out heavy equipment.
Plus it would be hard to convince locals it was a jet crash in such a case, so were they all in on it (as you would say)?
The flight 93 claim is a 757 disappeared into the ground - not just part of it, the whole thing. Anyone who claims such a thing is either lying or a fool.
Yes, we all know what it means. The question was "how low".
I understand the implications are difficult to deal with, but the topic is what caused the crater.
This is another lie. No one has claimed the entire aircraft disappeared into the ground
The location was eventually determined because of some disturbed ground in front of a grove of charred evergreens, explains Jamie. The ground had swallowed up much of the wreckage." - St. Anthony Messenger Online (09/06
the Boeing 757's fuselage disintegrated in a crater that collapsed on itself" - Pittsburg Post Gazette (10/15/01)
Ahh - so you believe authority by virtue of their authority and all other evidence be damned?
No, I believe in the preponderence of the evidence presented. When YOU have some EVIDENCE to present, anything, anything at all, by all means show it to us. So far you have a contention, bold and bald, mere fiction born soley from the deep recesses of your own imagination.
Hat-tip to KT.
It sure as **** wasn’t a missile(s). Especially considering that the missiles weren’t in production at the time.
Low-rate initial production decision for JASSM is in the year 2000
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/jassm.htm
ORLANDO, FL, 26-APR-01 --
Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control's Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) successfully demonstrated end-to-end performance by destroying an air defense target in a flight test at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico today. The missile was launched from a U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon flying at Mach 0.80, at an altitude of 2,800 feet above the New Mexico Desert. After weapon release, the missile autonomously navigated and guided to the mission planned target.
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/ne...pril/LockheedMartinSJASSMDestroysTargetW.html
Demonstrate how the wing gash and central crater are more consistent with a jet crash than with two dense metal 12x60 inch penetrating warheads striking in crossfire at glancing oblique trajectories, around 10 degrees from horizontal.
Why bother with 3/4 of million dollar missiles and precise trajectories? Why not just send a guy to the field in the middle of the night and plant much cheaper c4 and det cord? It's be much easier and cheaper than missiles.
I know it's not as sexy of a theory, but it fits the KISS principle.