How the Shanksville Crater Was Made

[phunk]

How can it lay down the gash BEFORE the warhead is embedded,. its been pointed out to you that under the ballistic claim you are making, the gash comes after impact, not before!

I think he's given up on the nasa simulation, now he's back to the missile making the gash on the way in.

 

[NoahFence]

Not too many 12 year olds have a midlife crisis.

I would assume.

 

[yankee451]

How about them trees that were in the way?

You mean the trees along the path of the missile as shown in the below image?

You mean the trees that are scorched? You mean the broken and charred trees? You mean the tree snapped in half right down the center?

You mean the trees that look like they got struck by an offcourse missile?

 

[FrederickEason]

You mean the trees that look like they got struck by an offcourse missile?

Well, they're definitely scorched, but I don't see why a missile is the only explanation. A crashing airplane can also damage and burn trees.

 

[yankee451]

Well, they're definitely scorched, but I don't see why a missile is the only explanation. A crashing airplane can also damage and burn trees.

The official explanation is the cockpit scorched the trees as it blew out like shrapnel.

I don't see any cockpit.

 

[beachnut]

What would a cockpit do at 487.5 knots at impact; Got Physics?

The official explanation is the cockpit scorched the trees as it blew out like shrapnel.

I don't see any cockpit.

LOL, it blew up at impact; did you fail to learn from your Pyrex balls?

You don't do physics, you do fantasy.

Fantasy
http://yankee451.com/about-me-2/
http://yankee451.com/2012/09/11/shanksville-crocodile-tears-for-the-fictional-dead/

No tears from you, only idiotic fantasy using a missile that did not exist. It failed in test.

 

[phunk]

The official explanation is the cockpit scorched the trees as it blew out like shrapnel.

I don't see any cockpit.

Where did you hear that "official" explanation? It sounds like nonsense to me. The fuel explosion is the obvious answer to what burnt the trees.

 

[yankee451]

I think he's given up on the nasa simulation, now he's back to the missile making the gash on the way in.

I haven't given up in the least, but you people don't even have a towel to throw in.

 

[NoahFence]

Well, they're definitely scorched, but I don't see why a missile is the only explanation. A crashing airplane can also damage and burn trees.

So can the engine from an F-18 Hornet strapped to the back of a Chevy Tahoe.

 

[yankee451]

Where did you hear that "official" explanation? It sounds like nonsense to me. The fuel explosion is the obvious answer to what burnt the trees.

I'm tired of repeating myself. I have linked to the quotes and the video. Find it.

 

[NoahFence]

You mean the trees along the path of the missile as shown in the below image?

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/path-of-the-missil-with-inset1.2.png[/qimg]

You mean the trees that are scorched? You mean the broken and charred trees? You mean the tree snapped in half right down the center?

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/split-tree.png[/qimg]

You mean the trees that look like they got struck by an offcourse missile?

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/gallery3-2.jpg[/qimg]

I'm aware that reality is the least of your concerns, but why does the top image have a curved line?

 

[phunk]

You mean the trees along the path of the missile as shown in the below image?

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/path-of-the-missil-with-inset1.2.png[/qimg]

You mean the trees that are scorched? You mean the broken and charred trees? You mean the tree snapped in half right down the center?

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/split-tree.png[/qimg]

You mean the trees that look like they got struck by an offcourse missile?

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/gallery3-2.jpg[/qimg]

The gouge in the ground does not point towards that split tree (if it's even split, can't say for sure from the pic).

 

[yankee451]

I think he's given up on the nasa simulation, now he's back to the missile making the gash on the way in.

Which is it then, meteorites from the inside out,

or missiles from the outside in?

 

[phunk]

That's not now the crater formed in the nasa simulation though, so do you admit that the nasa simulation is irrelevant now, and that you have no proof at all that missiles can form that crater shape?

Yes it is irrelevant.

I think he's given up on the nasa simulation, now he's back to the missile making the gash on the way in.

I haven't given up in the least, but you people don't even have a towel to throw in.

Make up your mind.

 

[FrederickEason]

The official explanation is the cockpit scorched the trees as it blew out like shrapnel.

I don't see any cockpit.

I don't see how the cockpit would be visible from the angle those pictures were taken at.

 

[phunk]

I'm tired of repeating myself. I have linked to the quotes and the video. Find it.

If you think you can keep me busy looking for something that doesn't exist, you're wrong. Feel free to show me where you posted it.

 

[phunk]

Which is it then, meteorites from the inside out,
[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Oblique-2.jpg[/qimg]

or missiles from the outside in?

[qimg]http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/detonated_undetonated.png[/qimg]

Plane, inverted, nose first into the ground.

 

[MarkCorrigan]

Yankee, are you claiming that the passengers and crew listed on UAL93 never existed?

Because if you are claiming they were real people, you have to explain where they went that doesn't end in "fiery death in a plane crash at Shaksville".

You never responded to this.

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

You mean the trees along the path of the missile as shown in the below image?

What missile?

 

[yankee451]

The gouge in the ground does not point towards that split tree (if it's even split, can't say for sure from the pic).

Sigh -

An "offcourse" missile would imply what to you?