How the Shanksville Crater Was Made

Status
Not open for further replies.
In what way was it condescending? It was just asking you to explain an unexplained part of your theory. If you can't anwer it, just say so. No need to get rude with the questioner.

Truthers! The most entertaining of chew toys.
 
When 'they' planned to make a 757 crash site, why do you think they decide to do it using your ridiculously convoluted method instead of just crashing a 757?

Because Americans are brainwasned and will believe authority by virtue of their authority. And nothing else.
 
Some aspects of the American educational system, obviously.

He has stated several times that he is self educated, aka the School Of Hard Knocks. Which phonetically SOHK is similar to SOCK. I think he's giving out hints as to his true status and purpose for being here.
 
Because Americans are brainwasned and will believe authority by virtue of their authority. And nothing else.

Or the simpler of two explanations is the more preferable one.

Lets assume for a moment your paranoid delusion had any bearing on reality. Lets assume the government was behind all of this, from the passengers supposedly taking control of the airplane they were in and crashing it in Shanksville to the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon.

Which sounds simpler to you?

Crashing an airplane in Shanksville or some overly contrived plot involving cruise missiles, planted evidence, and fake victims?

I also remind you that a small group of people purchased a Boeing 727, set it up for remote control, and intentionally crashed it in a desert. All this legally and on national television (why they don't do that with more decommissioned aircraft is beyond me, it would be an invaluable way to collect crash data). How much harder would it be for the government to do it on 9/11 and blame it on someone else?
 
He has stated several times that he is self educated, aka the School Of Hard Knocks. Which phonetically SOHK is similar to SOCK. I think he's giving out hints as to his true status and purpose for being here.

How does this work in Randi world anyway? No credentials means no credibility right? So let's say you're all correct - I'm as dumb as a box of rocks, but it doesn't make me wrong, and if you can't prove this box of rocks wrong, what does that say about you?
 
Bias against science, and reason, defines 451's missile fantasy

Yankee, if this is "so obvious" then why has it taken you over 11 years to figure out? ...

I'm a slow study, but at least I figured it out. What's your excuse?
Flight 93 Passengers figure out 911 in minutes, and you say they did not exist. You have not figured out anything but how to post idiotic lies.

How did UA93's black box got aboard the "cruise missile"?
You're a shrewed one, aren't you?
You have no back-story to go with your fantasy?

A fantasy on the fly. You have to back in the details you forgot, and picked a missile not in the inventory til 2002. A dumbed down self-debunking fantasy. Like the "they" you can't define, your story is weak and anti-intellectual, anti-American, anti-reason, darn right dumber than dirt lame BS.


Have you alway made up lies as dumb as these? You know Chemtrails are contrails, you don't know much about 911, you don't believe the moon landings, and you think nukes don't exist.

I can't grasp how you figure out Chemtrails are a scam, but you have problems with physics, orbital mechanics, aircraft impacts, math, video, photos, RADAR, FDR, FAA, NTSB, FBI, DNA, fire rescue, and more.

Is RADAR too hard to learn? How do you debunk RADAR? Why is 911 truth knowledge of 911 shallow.


Because Americans are brainwasned and will believe authority by virtue of their authority. And nothing else.
More BS, and no evidence.

brainwasned - lol, like your knowledge of 911.

You skipped brainwasnen, and went straight to stupid 911 fantasy.
 
How does this work in Randi world anyway? No credentials means no credibility right? So let's say you're all correct - I'm as dumb as a box of rocks, but it doesn't make me wrong, and if you can't prove this box of rocks wrong, what does that say about you?

If that followed, then I would have no credibility. I don't have any special credentials, licenses, permits, or titles to my name. And yet I have credibility.

Perhaps you should meditate on that.
 
How does this work in Randi world anyway? No credentials means no credibility right? So let's say you're all correct - I'm as dumb as a box of rocks, but it doesn't make me wrong, and if you can't prove this box of rocks wrong, what does that say about you?

I never said you're as dumb as a box of rocks. Refusing to admit error or answer details in order to prove your theory has nothing to do with your intelligence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom