Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

tusenfem said:
that suspicious guy must pay you well for distributing his junk every day
Click to expand...


Care to say what you think is "junk" about it ? He explains his point of view very well but leaves you to make your own mind up. You should try it :p

Payment ? Nope, you can't buy this ! Just putting out what makes more sense than the alternative is reward enough ! Feel free to peddle the "official b/s" but it's good to have a choice :D

The sunspot and earthspot linkage for example ;) and this too ...

Atmospheric Pressure - Wind/Storm Effects - North v South
 
Haig said:
Care to say what you think is "junk" about it ? He explains his point of view very well but leaves you to make your own mind up. You should try it :p

Payment ? Nope, you can't buy this ! Just putting out what makes more sense than the alternative is reward enough ! Feel free to peddle the "official b/s" but it's good to have a choice :D

The sunspot and earthspot linkage for example ;) and this too ...

Atmospheric Pressure - Wind/Storm Effects - North v South
Click to expand...

I have to wonder. Why is it that you are unable to express your own opinion, but must rely upon yoooboobery in exactly the same manner as the Apollo hoax crackpots? Can you explain that?
 
abaddon said:
I have to wonder. Why is it that you are unable to express your own opinion, but must rely upon yoooboobery in exactly the same manner as the Apollo hoax crackpots? Can you explain that?
Click to expand...


You're not making sense my friend ;) That post of mine that you quote IS my opinion - i.e. those words before the links. No need to look at the links if you don't want to :p
 
Haig said:
The OP says this ...
Click to expand...
And asks for your evidence instead of a person we now know is deluded crank (Ben Davidson).

Lying about Ben Davidson does not stop him from so stupid that he cannot understand high school level science: 9 June 2015 Haig: Why Ben Davidson's Sun -> earthquake videos are evidence of his delusions (not science!)

I was hoping that you would be smarter or more knowledgeable than Ben Davidson, Haig, but that does not seem the case.
You cannot even understand the simple science and English in 9 June 2015 Haig: Why Ben Davidson's Sun -> earthquake videos are evidence of his delusions (not science!) :jaw-dropp!

Then you answer Belz with gibberish :jaw-dropp!
Electric universe delusions have never driven the LHC.
The idiocy of thinking that scientists just "invent stuff" will never be obvious to you Haig because you cite a bunch of liars (The ignorance, delusions and lies in the Thunderbolts web site, videos etc.) and think that they are not lying to you!
 
Haig said:
Care to say what you think is "junk" about it ...
Click to expand...
That is easy Haig for any one who has had looked rationally at the videos: 9 June 2015 Haig: Why Ben Davidson's Sun -> earthquake videos are evidence of his delusions (not science!)

Not so easy for anyone mindlessly parroting Ben Davidson's delusions without trying to understand why they are wrong.
Or even worse - Ben Davidson is an electric universe crank. Haig is an electric universe crank. Could Haig be spamming this thread with these videos without even viewing them or trying to understand their contents? The evidence is mounting toward a yes since high school children could understand why they are wrong. Thus thread started on 4th March 2015 and Haig has yet to state an actual mechanism from Ben Davidson by which the Sun could trigger earthquakes. Haig denies the science that the Sun does not trigger earthquakes in favor of crank videos.
 
Last edited:
Reality Check said:
That is easy Haig for any one who has had looked rationally at the videos: 9 June 2015 Haig: Why Ben Davidson's Sun -> earthquake videos are evidence of his delusions (not science!)

Not so easy for anyone mindlessly parroting Ben Davidson's delusions without trying to understand why they are wrong.
Or even worse - Ben Davidson is an electric universe crank. Haig is an electric universe crank. Could Haig be spamming this thread with these videos without even viewing them or trying to understand their contents? The evidence is mounting toward a yes since high school children could understand why they are wrong. Thus thread started on 4th March 2015 and Haig has yet to state an actual mechanism from Ben Davidson by which the Sun could trigger earthquakes. Haig denies the science that the Sun does not trigger earthquakes in favor of crank videos.
Click to expand...


All you have is ad homs RC !

You say it's not science but these papers took the hypothesis seriously !

Tavares, M. and Azevedo, A. (2011) Influences of solar cycles on earthquakes. Natural Science, 3, 436-443. doi:10.4236/ns.2011.36060

While this second paper Does the sun trigger earthquakes? doubts the results of Tavares, M. and Azevedo, A. (2011) It makes this suggestion in the comments :- (my bold)

future studies could come to more significant conclusions, by, for example, correlating directly CME events with earthquakes.

That is what Ben Davidson has been doing for the last couple of years
Think again RC ;)

You could learn from this !

Sun Eruptions Begin, Earthquake Watch | S0 News June 10, 2015
 
Belz... said:
No, I don't. Perhaps you can explain it to me. Why would you expect them to accelerate those with gravity ?
Click to expand...

Oh the irony :D

Belz... said:
Have you shown any data that shows that earthquake activity increases and decreases with solar activity ?
Click to expand...

Sure, haven't you been paying attention ? my hilite

Published on 6 Jan 2014
1) Magnetic Polarity Data: http://wso.stanford.edu/Polar.html -- it has stopped updating since 11/23/2013.
2) Jupiter opposes the sun now, and Venus conjoins Mercury on January 8th. Anyone see that coronal hole coming in now?
3) There are some things you cannot un-see. If indeed the IMF and coronal holes are quake factors as I suggested for 2 years, then the underlying magnetics of the sun MUST be relevant to seismicity. I THOUGHT I was going to find an answer to the baffling quake droughts! ...I'm still in shock at how perfectly this matches.4) Today's news will appear on the website only, in a few hrs, going back to sleep. Be safe everyone.
Click to expand...
 
Haig said:
Oh the irony
Click to expand...

Is that an admission that you have no idea why anyone would expect them to use gravity ?

Of COURSE they use electromagnetism. Those are CHARGED particles. It's also important to note that we don't have gravity generators yet, and that gravity is attractive only.

So I ask you again: can you explain why you think it's funny ? Stop dodging and snarking.

Sure, haven't you been paying attention ? my hilite
Click to expand...

I'll take that as a "no".
 
Belz... said:
Is that an admission that you have no idea why anyone would expect them to use gravity ?

Of COURSE they use electromagnetism. Those are CHARGED particles. It's also important to note that we don't have gravity generators yet, and that gravity is attractive only.

So I ask you again: can you explain why you think it's funny ? Stop dodging and snarking.
Click to expand...


It's NOT funny if I have to keep explaining it :rolleyes:

It's electric potential that drives the Electric Universe. At Cern they have to plug the LHC into the Electricity Power grid, NOT the "Magnetic" Power grid, NOT the "Gravity" Power grid, NOT the Electromagnetic Power grid.

:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p

I'll take that as a "no".
Click to expand...

Nope, you can't. You'll need to play catch up, I'm not doing the work for you. Start looking HERE :p
 
Haig said:
It's electric potential that drives the Electric Universe. At Cern they have to plug the LHC into the Electricity Power grid, NOT the "Magnetic" Power grid, NOT the "Gravity" Power grid, NOT the Electromagnetic Power grid.
Click to expand...

That doesn't answer my question: why would you expect them to use gravity in the LHC, even without EU ?

:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p
Click to expand...

What are you, twelve ?

Nope, you can't.
Click to expand...

Yeah I can, so long as you don't present solid evidence for your nonsense claims.

Start looking HERE :p
Click to expand...

Youtube videos exist that claim a lot of crazy ****. I asked for evidence, not rhetoric.
 
Haig said:
It's electric potential that drives the Electric Universe. At Cern they have to plug the LHC into the Electricity Power grid, NOT the "Magnetic" Power grid, NOT the "Gravity" Power grid, NOT the Electromagnetic Power grid.
Click to expand...

Uh, actually, they just use the electricity to power magnets. The particles are accelerated by magnetic fields, not electric potential.
 
phunk said:
Uh, actually, they just use the electricity to power magnets. The particles are accelerated by magnetic fields, not electric potential.
Click to expand...


Try missing out the electricity bit :D

As mainstream are wont to do. They happily cite magnetic fields being detected ALL across the Universe but forget to mention that magnetism and electricity are intrinsically linked in electromagnetism.

Electromagnetic Forces on Charged Particles PDF (my bold)
We therefore reach the important conclusion that
– Magnetic fields cannot be used to change the kinetic
energy of a particle
• We must rely on electric fields for particle
acceleration
Click to expand...


You really have to laugh :p
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom