That is a very good idea, DrCron. If Gravy approves, I'm sure it will be much appreciated.I'm in the process of turning the doc into a nice PDF (perhaps a PS later, if people want one). I hope thats ok with gravy, and will await approval before releasing a link. I should have it up in a little while.
Thanks to Gravy, I took a peek on steel/temp curves. "Drawing a picture," will try to find a better one. Figure 3 is what shows why the argument against thermal loading as a likely cause for failure ignores simple material science.More just emphasising clarifying - many of the newspaper articles (especially the stuff the Truthers like to cling to) make the waters a bit murky by trying to pin him to a terrorism exercise.
The ultimate presentation being this recent exercise at the Pentagon was ALSO one of these terrorism exercises (thus replicate the 9/11 attack).
Just wanted to emphasise to everyone that the exercise in question didn't involve terrorism, thus blowing all CT claims out of the water.
-Andrew
P.S. I believe the main reason most people report the aircraft speed in MPH is because it's familiar. Most people don't know what knots are. Likewise, here in New Zealand you'll usually see stuff like this described in km/h.
Thanks for offering to do a PDF. I wasn't able to create one with Acrobat that would preserve both the formatting and the hyperlinks: it would only do one or the other.Has anyone actually used a PC with microsoft office to open this? All the images are broken (endian diffrences it seems). It seems the easiest way to fix is to use office on a mac to reformat the images ala http://www.thrrrust.com/~pclark/blog/2004/12/quicktime-and-tiff-lzw-decompressor.html if someone could do this I can have the pdf a half an hour later.
I'd be more interested to hear what you have to say about NIST's findings, since they're specifically about conditions in the towers.Thanks to Gravy, I took a peek on steel/temp curves. "Drawing a picture," will try to find a better one. Figure 3 is what shows why the argument against thermal loading as a likely cause for failure ignores simple material science.
http://www.wtia.com.au/pdf/TGN-PE-04 Weld Repair of Creep Damaged Steel.pdf
See also this article
http://www.key-to-steel.com/articles/art88.htm
but note that temps are in def F, not deg C, so do a little C = 1.8*f - 32 to match up the temps of jet fuel, and everything else that was burning, to see where some standard steel alloys would be expected to fail.
DR
Thanks, Gravy, it may take a week or two to read their entire report, and if my brain can soak it up and spit out something lucid, I'll be happy to do so.I'd be more interested to hear what you have to say about NIST's findings, since they're specifically about conditions in the towers.
Just read it. Thanks for all the info. I obviously didn't do enough homework on the subject!Thanks, Gravy, it may take a week or two to read their entire report, and if my brain can soak it up and spit out something lucid, I'll be happy to do so.
Were you interested in what I provided to you about Captain Burlingame and the MASCAL issue, or was I wasting my breath with that?
DR
I would not expect a single man to do it all. I took your request of offering insights (from your guide) to heart and provided what I could based on where I had specific knowledge.Just read it. Thanks for all the info. I obviously didn't do enough homework on the subject!
deleted
Loose Change is saying that Chick worked on these excercises at the Pentagon, then heads to American Airlines, the implication being that he left the military, then went over to AA to finish the job. I don't see a problem with saying "That's wrong." It omits the fact that he was in the reserves, but you don't need that fact to simply show that LC is wrong.October 24th, 2000. The Pentagon conducts the first of two training exercises called MASCAL, which simulate a Boeing 757 crashing into the building. Charles Burlingame, an ex-Navy F4 pilot who worked in the Pentagon, Participates in this exercise before retiring to take a job at American Airlines, where, less than a year later, his Boeing 757 allegedly crashes into the building.
That's wrong. Burlingame had been a pilot with American since 1979. Source (Thanks CurtC)
Please spell out the chronology, as your criticism is incomplete. Don't make your readers look around for the facts, your "source" link has much detail, and but also contains errors.
I disagree with you Curt.Loose Change is saying that Chick worked on these excercises at the Pentagon, then heads to American Airlines, the implication being that he left the military, then went over to AA to finish the job. I don't see a problem with saying "That's wrong." It omits the fact that he was in the reserves, but you don't need that fact to simply show that LC is wrong.
So far this month (it's the 18th), my server has delivered over 100 GB of data total.
Wish I could make it, but I'm in Orlando.SKEPTICS, WE NEED YOU AT THIS EVENT!!!
thanks
RU Sirius
And finally expose the truth for all to see? Are you mad? Do you know what would happen if Dylan told all?I'd love to have him tell us exactly what things you brought up that aren't true, and why