Mike Stephens
Student
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2007
- Messages
- 39
Wasting your breath Tabouere, the only thing they are skeptical about here are skeptics to the official lies.
Gravy's "Loose Change" Critique, part deux
- Thread starter Gravy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- gravy loose change
delphi_ote
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2005
- Messages
- 5,994
Ah, the typical Truther response when an argument is completely demolished: a smoke screen of nonsense to cover a hasty retreat.
It's the truth. Your simple world view is allergic to it! Flee, little man!
Hawk one
Emperor of the Internet
So, Mike Stephens, where -is- the evidence that metal debris and human remains were found 6 miles away in airline?
Slayhamlet
Master Poster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,423
So, Google Earth is an official lie as well? Damn, the NWO sure does get around!
Do you have anything more on your stuff about the concrete in the WTC towers. And you never came back to fix your Payne Stewart interception time. Just look at your old posts and see where you left off. It has been 2 or 3 weeks, have you found some facts?
Mike, you need to read the this paper so you can learn about 9/11 and how CTs tell lies and make up information.
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
Last edited:
gumboot
lorcutus.tolere
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,327
Oh wow,
Les Rapael joined us. I've missed arguing about the Naudets with whatshisname.
Tabouere, your articles doesn't say that debris was found nearly six miles away from the crash. It says two related statements:
1) Debris was found in Indian Lake
2) Indian Lake is nearly 6 miles from the crash site.
From this is built the conclusion:
3) The debris in Indian Lake was nearly 6 miles from the crash site.
The problem is, if either 1 or 2 is false, 3 must be false also. And 2, in this instance, is demonstratively false. Indian lake is nowhere near 6 miles from the crash site.
Have you evidence of any other debris being cited to have landed 6 miles from the crash site? Or will you withdraw your claim.
Finally, what does this prove?
When Pan Am Flight 103 broke up over Lockerbie, Scotland, it spread debris over a corridor over 80 miles long and covering over 800 square miles. Other aircraft that have broken up in mid flight routinely scatter light debris hundreds of kilometres away.
-Gumboot
Les Rapael joined us. I've missed arguing about the Naudets with whatshisname.
Tabouere, your articles doesn't say that debris was found nearly six miles away from the crash. It says two related statements:
1) Debris was found in Indian Lake
2) Indian Lake is nearly 6 miles from the crash site.
From this is built the conclusion:
3) The debris in Indian Lake was nearly 6 miles from the crash site.
The problem is, if either 1 or 2 is false, 3 must be false also. And 2, in this instance, is demonstratively false. Indian lake is nowhere near 6 miles from the crash site.
Have you evidence of any other debris being cited to have landed 6 miles from the crash site? Or will you withdraw your claim.
Finally, what does this prove?
When Pan Am Flight 103 broke up over Lockerbie, Scotland, it spread debris over a corridor over 80 miles long and covering over 800 square miles. Other aircraft that have broken up in mid flight routinely scatter light debris hundreds of kilometres away.
-Gumboot