Reading comprehension isn't your thing, is it?John Farmer still maintains that the csv file was altered to show a south approach as he mentioned in a thread here a few days ago.
You seem to have quite the obsession with Farmer, almost as if you have a history with him.I'd like to see if John Farmer agees that he was "manipulated" by PFT and CIT to come up with his analysis regarding the csv file being altered. According to his replies on the LCF thread linked and quoted by apathoid, it appears Farmer was pretty confident of his calculations.
So does Farmer now think his calculations regarding the csv file were "pseudoscience" as claimed by Anti-Sohist? Does Farmer think he was an "idjit" and "idiot" as claimed by Apathoid?
Seems a trend is developing here regarding Farmer.
Not at all. People change their minds.You arent concerned that Farmer was called an idiot by apathoid and Beachnut? you arent concerned that Anti=Sophist called his work "pseudoscience"?
Don't really care.So you think Farmer will admit his work on the csv file was "pseudoscience"?
Then feel free to comment here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=130689Math? Why do you keep wanting to derail the topic?
He may simply have been in a 9th grade science class -
Don't really care.
crock.
TAM![]()
My goal was to understand for myself which data in those files makes sense in the “real world” and which has been tampered with. When you have three representations of the “same” data set, and all three are different, then I don’t think that any reasonable person can claim that they have not been tampered with.
JRyan, you might want to take a look at Farmer's work in this thread, where he states that PfT's own decode of the CSV file is consistent with the official AA77 flightpath.
Farmer appears to be capable of learning from his mistakes. PfT, on the other hand, does not.
Isnt the "statistics" and "mathematician" referred to as the "idjit" by apathoid and "the latest idiot" by Beachnut and what Anti-Sophist claims...
"What's worse is this abject gibberish is dressed up in mildly sophisticated language. It's pseudoscience to the max, meant to mislead the stupid. It's worked. "
... arent they referring to the same John Farmer who is now "911Files" on the JREF who still maintains the csv file was altered to show a southern approach?
Yep, looks like the same guy. I wonder why no one really questions his "pseudo-science" anymore, consdering Farmer does maintain the csv file is altered.
Have a nice day...
(thread saved)
John Farmer still maintains that the csv file was altered to show a south approach as he mentioned in a thread here a few days ago. His analysis was not triggered by or due to the "manipulation" of PFT or CIT. He came up with it all on his own and contacted/alerted Rob regarding same. Didnt you read the email?