Why do these idiots even bother arguing with us GLs? Don't they have better things to do, like say for example, showing the entire world their "evidence"?
Does anyone recall whether or not I have asked that question in the past and perhaps suggested to TF et al that they might want to change their tactics in getting their message out to the general public?
I seem to recall that I and others have suggested that, rather than argue incessantly on the internet with persons they consider incapable of sufficiently understanding the concepts involved to render any informed comment, they instead compile a consise and purely technical paper showing their work and how they have concluded that;
- The FDR data illustrates a grossly differing flight path than the one delineated by the downed lamp posts.
- That an aircraft crash alone cannot cause an FDR to lose or have corrupted, some of the data that was written to it.
I could be wrong, maybe none of us has ever made comments to that effect.
ETA: << smacks one's own forehead>> of course, now I remember. I was banned from PfT for suggesting that PfT compile a technical paper devoid of threats and accusations and submit it to "Aviation Week" and "Scientific American" and other similar publications.
Now how could I forget such a thing?
IIRC, (and I do) Cappy Bob then called me down for not responding to a post of his in the thread in which I made those suggestions despite the fact that he, himself, had banned me between the time of his creating that post and my next attempt to log on to the forum.
IIRC, (and I do) Cappy Bob also then responded to my e-mails, in which I asked why I was banned, that I was banned because he had tired of me, a gov't loyalist, posting on his forum.
