Continuation The Electric Comet Theory Boogaloo (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sol88 said:
@Tusenfem & Jonesdave116

Jonesdave116 said

LINK @14:25

[qimg]http://i60.tinypic.com/vrsxtf.png[/qimg]

RPC principal investigator Karl-Heinz Glaßmeier, your Boss Tusenfem?

What is he saying? Or are you gagged?

Wondered why you've been so cagey :)

Your just bust'n to let rip but eh?
Click to expand...

if you had been paying attention, sweety, you would know that that is exactly what i have posted, and what is discussed in the annales paoer, and what i have discussed and discussed, the cross-field current creating an instability.

khg us my pi, not my boss, but a very good friend.

i am not gagged, you just have sjyt in your eyes reading answers and explanations.
 
Last edited:
Sol88 said:
So where are these currents around the comet? Have a look at the magnetic data preceding, during and following the jet observed on 29 July. <70nT down to ~2nT. No electric currents in that cavity. None in the cavity at Halley. No solar wind, and only cometary ions detected. Where are they coming from? Not the solar wind and nothing electrical. Sunlight still gets through, though.
Click to expand...

you're hopeless, come back after studying some basic physics

what magnetic signatures would you expect in tbe diamagnetic cavity, and from which currents?

and what do you mean "where are tbhey coming from"? who is tbey? the cometary ions? if the latter the answer seems clear and simole enough that even yiu could find it.

once again you are just purposely acting dumb, the game you are gettin off on, i guess this is all a wet dream for you.
 
Last edited:
tusenfem said:
you're hopeless, come back after studying some basic physics

what magnetic signatures would you expect in tbe diamagnetic cavity, and from which currents?

and what do you mean "where are tbhey coming from"? who is tbey? the cometary ions? if the latter the answer seems clear and simole enough that even yiu could find it.

once again you are just purposely acting dumb, the game you are gettin off on, i guess this is all a wet dream for you.
Click to expand...

Slight confusion there I think, Tus. The post you quoted was mine to Sol!
And yes, that is the point I was trying to make; where could the cometary ions within the cavity come from? Answer; the surface. How did they get there, given there are no solar wind impacts, and no electric woo? From sublimation. The point, not to mention the implication of the diamagnetic cavity, seems to have passed him by.
 
 
Sol88 said:
Let's start with the 100 Ampere current shall we? :D
...snipped delusions....
Click to expand...
Let us start, Sol88, without your delusion that a tethered wire is in orbit around 67P :eek:.
A 100 A current is caused by ions from neural atoms ionized by solar UV interacting with the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field.
 
Sol88 said:
or unexpected, non-observed currents from the Sun.
Click to expand...
Derailing into the electric sun idiocy does not help you look any smarter, Sol88.
The THEMIS mission debunked that delusion by not finding the currents it needs.

More delusions about science from you: Birkeland currents are currents around the Earth caused by the interaction of the Earth's magnetic field with the solar wind.

Non-deluded people do not expect Birkeland currents around the Sun.
 
Last edited:
Sol88 said:
Are you saying..
Click to expand...
Are you saying that you are even deluded about English and Earth science, Sol88?
Stefano Mottola PI for ROLIS is talking about ROLIS, not an imaginary magnetosphere around 67P :jaw-dropp!
W do not have to have a sample of the core of the Earth to determine its composition :jaw-dropp!
 
Last edited:
Sol88 said:
Not what was said in the perihelion hangout, energetic electrons are! ...
Click to expand...
No need to confirm that you have been totally ignorant about comets for 6 years now, Sol88.
Rational, knowledgeable people expect energetic electrons when neutral atoms are ionized by solar UV and interact with the solar wind and magnetic field.
Rational, knowledgeable people are not so deluded that they think that this is evidence that comets are rocks :eek:.
 
Reality Check said:
Are you saying that you are even deluded about English and Earth science, Sol88?
Stefano Mottola PI for ROLIS is talking about ROLIS, not an imaginary magnetosphere around 67P :jaw-dropp!
W do not have to have a sample of the core of the Earth to determine its composition :jaw-dropp!
Click to expand...

Ya gone and mixed up all your quotes ya goose!

Jonesdave116 STATED the Earth has a molten iron core, not me! :confused:

And Stefano Mottola said no fine dust, so where the fine dust come from?

It's been observed from ALL comets so far but none on the surface, only gravel/pebbles!

Go watch the live video from yesterday


So no dust (fine or otherwise) and no surface "ice"!
 
Last edited:
Sol88 said:
Ya gone a mixed up all your quotes ya goose!

Jonesdave116 STATED the Earth has a molten iron core, not me! :confused:

And Stefano Mottola said no fine dust, so where the fine dust come from?

It's been observed from ALL comets so far but none on the surface, only gravel/pebbles!


So no dust (fine or otherwise) and no surface "ice"!
Click to expand...

What you talking 'bout now Willis? They have spectrally identified surface ice on this comet, as well as at Tempel 1. How many sodding times do you need telling?
Dust? Read the bloody GIADA results from months back.
Seriously, you are now becoming tiresome. (and haven't got a clue about comets; other than what you've "learned" from equally scientifically illiterate eejits, such as Thornhill and his sidekick).

Give it a rest. You haven't got a clue.
 
Variable spin rate of the nucleus is gunna be fun from a sublimating comets theory!

Have a crack at that RC, before you can run and hide behind "people more knowledgeable than you" again.

Not convinced you can think for yourself any more :(

That's a shame.
 
jonesdave116 said:
What you talking 'bout now Willis? They have spectrally identified surface ice on this comet, as well as at Tempel 1. How many sodding times do you need telling?
Dust? Read the bloody GIADA results from months back.
Seriously, you are now becoming tiresome. (and haven't got a clue about comets; other than what you've "learned" from equally scientifically illiterate eejits, such as Thornhill and his sidekick).

Give it a rest. You haven't got a clue.
Click to expand...


Go watch the live cross, no one is denying the dust, which includes extremely high temperature flash formed minerals, just none observed on the surface.

Ask the principal investigator Stefano!

also the Tempel 1 findings don't pass the sniff test when they find trivial ice on the surface but just next door they have receding "icy" cliffs!
 
Sol88 said:
Variable spin rate of the nucleus is gunna be fun from a sublimating comets theory!

Have a crack at that RC, before you can run and hide behind "people more knowledgeable than you" again.

Not convinced you can think for yourself any more :(

That's a shame.
Click to expand...

That is seriously rich coming from someone who doesn't understand comets at even a basic level. And believes (without any evidence) that they were blasted off of planets in the last ~10 000 years. Believes that the Sun is electric (without any evidence). Believes that, somehow, a diamagnetic cavity means that electric woo can still be happening on a comet (unobserved; undetected; unpredicted, other than by eejits). Believes that, in the possible absence of said electric woo, there might be a gargantuan increase in the solar wind flux (probably by about 12 orders of magnitude, absolute minimum). Again, unobserved and undetected.
And probably still doesn't realise that observations at Halley, nearly 30 years ago, killed this garbage stone dead.
Like I keep saying, you have absolutely zero evidence for your idiotic beliefs. They died in 1986, at the latest. Deal with it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom