8 out of 8 at Citgo station

Well Smith, it was obvious to me while you waved your flag and yearned for revenge. To those evil muslims who are your enemy in the war on terra. Right? Wake up, man. No friggin' plane at the friggin' Pentagon. Never was. With your knowledge it's your duty to help stopping the madness based on the false flag event that was 9/11. Save the republic from the empire ten years after the coup. That's the litmus test for you, Mr. Smith. That's what at least I am judging you by. You don't fare well.
 
Well Smith, it was obvious to me while you waved your flag and yearned for revenge. To those evil muslims who are your enemy in the war on terra. Right? Wake up, man. No friggin' plane at the friggin' Pentagon. Never was. With your knowledge it's your duty to help stopping the madness based on the false flag event that was 9/11. Save the republic from the empire ten years after the coup. That's the litmus test for you, Mr. Smith. That's what at least I am judging you by. You don't fare well.

What? Are you off your meds? Now you rant just like Dumbenick Dimmagio, You aren't sharing your account now are you? what time is it there in Germany anyhow? shouldnt you be asleep? (or waking up really early)
 
The evidence shows that no 757 hit the Pentagon...
And to come to that conclusion requires you to assert that the lamp poles were planted, the DNA was faked, the FDR was altered, and the structural damage to the building was artificially created using a different mechanism. All assertions without any supporting proof to give credence to them.

If your evidence for all of that being faked or invalid is in the 8 "NOC witnesses" reporting a deviation in the flight pat, then you have another major problem which I've made clear to you multiple times; namely that neither you nor CIT took a representative sample of witness testimony, and the CIT group poisoned the well by asserting all others outside of the statistical outliers are government shills.

If you are not going to acknowledge it because of the activity in this thread against you then the only suggestion I can offer is that you consult the matter with a professional lawyer in person as to whether your case would make it into court as is. Clearly you have no intention of listening to me or anyone else on this site, and need to hear it from someone well versed in civil cases. This is something that CIT should have done long ago if they intend to ever advance beyond an "independent investigation." It'd be beneficial to you to do something that they'd been holding off on for reasons apparantly unknown given they contend to have a slam dunk case.
 
Last edited:
You understood me very well, Smith. Doing nothing is being complicit, duhbunkies.

Yeah you been up all night and its showing, So your gonna waste a Saturday sleeping in, Even though the suns come up you just draw the shade and wish the world would share your world view. Yes i understand you very well. But your not from around these parts, Ive never been very patriotic, Im more centrist so I have problems with the government and corp influence no matter who's in office, If you grew up here you would know just how incompetent government is and realize they couldn't possibly pull off such a conspiracy. You brush off all physical evidence, I however, depend on physical evidence for my judgments.
 
Last edited:
And to come to that conclusion requires you to assert that the lamp poles were planted, the DNA was faked, the FDR was altered, and the structural damage to the building was artificially created using a different mechanism. All assertions without any supporting proof to give credence to them.


Yeah, but that's where the evidence leads to. You can't account for the event at the pentagon which left no evidence of a 757 crash and you can't account for what the witnesses have to say.

There is no left-right spectrum in this debate, Smith. There is just us versus a tiny psychopath minority and their lackeys. Building their illusions on our fears.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but that's where the evidence leads to. You can't account for the event at the pentagon which left no evidence of a 757 crash and you can't account for what the witnesses have to say.

There is no left-right spectrum in this debate, Smith. There is just us versus a tiny psychopath minority and their lackeys. Building their illusions on our fears.
no matter how many times you repeat that lie, It is still a lie, And wont make it true.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6792975&postcount=1482
 
You failed to explain why the CITGO is the north/south divide in this argument, 16.5. What kind of evidence is Pickering able to provide?

lol wut

Hee hee. Scene: a cheap couch, upon it sits a young.... er middle aged man on it, with his shirt inexplicably opened for some reason, trembling uncontrollably, and next to him a mute cross between a troll and a slightly smaller, heavier troll, wearing a jaunty beret scavenged from the nearest highway underpass. The trembling man begins to speak:

Ranke: "we have numerous witnesses who all saw the plane north of Citgo" who also say that the plane hit the Pentagon, and this proves that a plane did not hit the Pentagon!

Fin.

hee hee!

You might want to watch: National Type Security Alert, parts of our website always under construction part two: The Humiliating, electric boogaloo
 
April Gallop again:


noticeofmotion.jpg
 
Craig.. a cyclops with the lego man hair?

lol wut

Hee hee. Scene: a cheap couch, upon it sits a young.... er middle aged man on it, with his shirt inexplicably opened for some reason, trembling uncontrollably, and next to him a mute cross between a troll and a slightly smaller, heavier troll, wearing a jaunty beret scavenged from the nearest highway underpass. The trembling man begins to speak:

Ranke: "we have numerous witnesses who all saw the plane north of Citgo" who also say that the plane hit the Pentagon, and this proves that a plane did not hit the Pentagon!

Fin.

hee hee!

You might want to watch: National Type Security Alert, parts of our website always under construction part two: The Humiliating, electric boogaloo


Know what creeps me out? the way he doesn't face the camera but turns his head like hes got a dead right eye. LOL
 
There is just us versus a tiny psychopath minority and their lackeys. Building their illusions on our fears.
WTF is "us"? The majority of a tiny psychopath minority and their lackeys full of fears? Strange perception + strange self-perception = psychopathic illusion

What a waste of time here.
 
WTF is "us"? The majority of a tiny psychopath minority and their lackeys full of fears? Strange perception + strange self-perception = psychopathic illusion

What a waste of time here.

Wow. Dude I feel your pain arguing with CE, but still; frankly, and with all due respect, you are a member of a different sect of the same cult.
 
Nothing like the amazing pentalawn, Achim. Scenery would look a world different from this.


Again, what would you expect the lawn to look like? It wasn't hit by a plane.:confused:

Please tell us what the crash site should have looked like...........link to similar accidents that look very different.:confused:
 
I'm ready to carry on with this thread - somebody wants to explain "north" and "south" re: the CITGO witnesses?

We already have. Which part did you not understand.

Mr Morin SoC
Mr Middleton Impossible story if Morin is Correct
Mr Turcious Lying
Mr LaGasse Not wher he said he was
Chad (the other cop) Mistaken as to where he oark his Cruiser that morning
The Cemetery crowd No frame of reference so cannot possiblt tell where lane was.
Lloyde Lied to and confused by CIT But his original story is SoC
Zakhem SoC but called shill by CIT
Vignola and Timmerman No flyover
vignolasightlines.jpg

Steve Anderson No Flyover
Deb AnLauf SoC and no fly over
debanlauf.jpg


Oh thats more than eight.....wonder why CIT neglected to mention all the other witnesses that didn't fit their lies?????

Do you want more??
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but that's where the evidence leads to. You can't account for the event at the pentagon which left no evidence of a 757 crash and you can't account for what the witnesses have to say.
Like I said, you need to take your evidence to a lawyer or prosecutor and get their professional judgment and legal advice in person. I've explained to you more than enough that the selection bias you & CIT are supporting will cost you any suit you might try to bring to court, and I will guarantee that the issues you've been explained here will be explained to you by a competent legal professional. You need to hear it for yourself, since you obviously aren't getting an answer to your satisfaction here. I'd be interested in whatever response you get, but I don't think the answer will be all that difficult to predict.

I wonder if you'll even try asking one...
 
Last edited:
What does it tell you? Either these guys left school at the age of 10 or they are staged to be as ridiculous as possible in the name of "truthers".
Divide and Conquer. ;)

You nailed it Achim, but I would disagree with you on one point - I think for them to divide and conquer there plan was to be believable to some truthers - I think ideally what they wanted was a situation where the truth movement was split right down the middle.

(Also, we know they didn't leave school at 10, Aldo managed to make it all the way through High School;)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom