8 out of 8 at Citgo station

[ozeco41]

That's it.

I think the argument was the wording of "actual air-frame" .

Couldn't spell "fuselage"???

 

[Reactor drone]

He lost sight of the fuselage so that only part of the empennage was visible.

 

[jaydeehess]

Couldn't spell "fuselage"???

It was an interview with Morin, not a prepared statement. The later allows one to edit and revise for best clarity.

There was much navel gazing iirc about 'air frame', does or doesn't it include the tail section. It makes do difference of course, Terry Morin saw a large , low, fast , aircraft approach the Pentagon, go down the hill towards the building and then he saw a large fireball BUT NEVER saw the aircraft again.

Well since we are reviving this beaten horse of a thread, there is also the treatment the CiT gave Sean Boger, who was in the Heliport control tower. He watched as the plane approached and says he watched it "hit" the building. Ahhh but the insipid intrepid CiT note that he says it approached "over" the Citgo station which corressponds to their fantasy. What of his witnessing the impact? Well, he lied about that of course.

 

[ozeco41]

He lost sight of the fuselage so that only part of the empennage was visible.

Curses - beat me by ONE letter.

"elevator" - nope

"aileron" - nix

"rudder" - worse

"leading-edge-slats" - maybe but....