8 out of 8 at Citgo station

[sheeplesnshills]

You failed to explain why the CITGO is the north/south divide in this argument, 16.5. What kind of evidence is Pickering able to provide?

It isn't. Its the dividing point in CITs argument. Since there was no argument prior to their money making scam, their frame of reference is the one used in discussions on the subject.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Come on, Reheat, Apathoid, Clinger, BCR, Mackey and the liar beachnut, whoever, if you have something to say: Put up or shut up.

Glad we've settled this.

Time for the first image i've ever uploaded to the forum. No, it's the second one because i'll post the annotated version. Green and red are duhbunkie observations, yellow is my final hint. July 2006:

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

CE's arguments remind me of Brian Good. Nothing "Good" can come from CE's arguements.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Glad we've settled this.

Time for the first image i've ever uploaded to the forum. No, it's the second one because i'll post the annotated version. Green and red are duhbunkie observations, yellow is my final hint. July 2006:

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/990744cae12212dd4.jpg[/qimg]

Is this lieu of answering ANY of the questions we've?. So far all you have is arguments from incredulity.

Your Incredulous that eye witness evidence can be mistaken 7 years after an event
Your incredulous that the crash site doesn't "look like it should" yet cannot tell us what it should look like

and strangely you believe without question CITs assertion that everyone would have missed a flyover and that hundreds of people at the Pentagon alone are willing to be complicit in mass murder and remain silent, without exception, for 9 years.



OK assuming we do have some lurkers.....does anyone else think this is a reasonable story?

 

[I Ratant]

It's not even "cognitive dissonance", it's "invincible ignorance".
The duckling is imprinted with "no plane, and it was NoC", and cannot think it's past the imprinting.

 

[Myriad]

Yeah, for sure. People who don't believe it when other people make up crazy **** that contradicts all the available evidence are the cause of all the problems in the world.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[A W Smith]

The empress has no clothes.

Is this lieu of answering ANY of the questions we've?. So far all you have is arguments from incredulity.

Your Incredulous that eye witness evidence can be mistaken 7 years after an event
Your incredulous that the crash site doesn't "look like it should" yet cannot tell us what it should look like

and strangely you believe without question CITs assertion that everyone would have missed a flyover and that hundreds of people at the Pentagon alone are willing to be complicit in mass murder and remain silent, without exception, for 9 years.



OK assuming we do have some lurkers.....does anyone else think this is a reasonable story?

When all the physical evidence contradicts conspiracy and her incredulous world view, She falls back on blaming the elite, omnipotent, imaginary shape shifting lizard demons in her head. Even if she has no proof whatsoever of their existence. Oh and be sure to embed the text of your revelations within an image so the lizard people cannot see it and come after you in your sleep.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Yeah, for sure. People who don't believe it when other people make up crazy **** that contradicts all the available evidence are the cause of all the problems in the world.

Respectfully,
Myriad

Especially when those crazy people have a gun & shoot Gov. officials & innocent people. Tucson, Arizona for example!

 

[tsig]

beachnut, yes, we understood it already. You hoped that i would stop posting here and expose your lies when you've read the linked post of mine, but yet i was talking about the subforum, not the JREF forum as a whole. I never planned to stop coming and observing here.

Sorry. So sorry, liar.

CE, your link does not show any lie Beechnut told. You should spell it out or quit saying that.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

CE, your link does not show any lie Beechnut told. You should spell it out or quit saying that.

I've already asked her that. She did not do so.

 

[tsig]

Well Smith, it was obvious to me while you waved your flag and yearned for revenge. To those evil muslims who are your enemy in the war on terra. Right? Wake up, man. No friggin' plane at the friggin' Pentagon. Never was. With your knowledge it's your duty to help stopping the madness based on the false flag event that was 9/11. Save the republic from the empire ten years after the coup. That's the litmus test for you, Mr. Smith. That's what at least I am judging you by. You don't fare well.

Nothing like a post filled with math, facts and evidence.

 

[tsig]

Yeah, but that's where the evidence leads to. You can't account for the event at the pentagon which left no evidence of a 757 crash and you can't account for what the witnesses have to say.

There is no left-right spectrum in this debate, Smith. There is just us versus a tiny psychopath minority and their lackeys. Building their illusions on our fears.

Serious pronoun confusion here.

Am I on your side or one of the lackeys?

 

[tsig]

Wow. Dude I feel your pain arguing with CE, but still; frankly, and with all due respect, you are a member of a different sect of the same cult.

Kinda like the LDS* arguing with the RLDS**.

latter day saints*

reformed lds**

 

[tsig]

CE, your link does not show any lie Beechnut told. You should spell it out or quit saying that.

I believe CE is a 'he'.

 

[Childlike Empress]

CE, your link does not show any lie Beechnut told. You should spell it out or quit saying that.

I've already asked her that. She did not do so.

Stop pretending.

The post contains everything you need to know. No context needed. beachnut spread the rumor that CIT were lying about Paik's testimony and I exposed that it was him who was doing so, including re-naming the image of Paik. He is pointing east, on the north side of Columbia Pike. "North" in the argument. Yet beachnut renamed it from "edwardpointsnorth.gif" to "edwardpointsouth.gif" and pretended that Paik was pointing to the "real/official" flight path.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Stop pretending.

The post contains everything you need to know. No context needed. beachnut spread the rumor that CIT were lying about Paik's testimony and I exposed that it was him who was doing so, including re-naming the image of Paik. He is pointing east, on the north side of Columbia Pike. "North" in the argument. Yet beachnut renamed it from "edwardpointsnorth.gif" to "edwardpointsouth.gif" and pretended that Paik was pointing to the "real/official" flight path.

And this proves what exactly?

I highly doubt that Beachnut is capable of doing what you're already doing in this thread CE.

 

[DGM]

CE:
You never answered. How does CIT (you) decide what parts of the witnesses statements to keep and which to ignore. You do acknowledge the fact some of their statements are in fact ignored, don't you?

 

[BCR]

Stop pretending.

The post contains everything you need to know. No context needed. beachnut spread the rumor that CIT were lying about Paik's testimony and I exposed that it was him who was doing so, including re-naming the image of Paik. He is pointing east, on the north side of Columbia Pike. "North" in the argument. Yet beachnut renamed it from "edwardpointsnorth.gif" to "edwardpointsouth.gif" and pretended that Paik was pointing to the "real/official" flight path.

Now who is lying. Paik was INSIDE his shop and points SOUTH. Later on, in an effort to distort Paik's testimony, CIT had Paik stand where he is standing in their video and point in the direction of travel he saw the plane go in. The fact is he DID NOT see and COULD NOT see beyond the front lot of his shop. CIT knew that but never once mentioned it. So either Paik and his brother are lying about where Paik was standing or CIT is. Guess who my money is on?

 

[Childlike Empress]

Now who is lying. Paik was INSIDE his shop and points SOUTH. Later on, in an effort to distort Paik's testimony, CIT had Paik stand where he is standing in their video and point in the direction of travel he saw the plane go in. The fact is he DID NOT see and COULD NOT see beyond the front lot of his shop. CIT knew that but never once mentioned it. So either Paik and his brother are lying about where Paik was standing or CIT is. Guess who my money is on?

As if he couldn't tell if the plane is flying directly over his shop or on the other side of the street behind the VDOT. Your buddy Larson also established that Paik witnessed the plane over his shop. This is desperate nonsense.

 

[Childlike Empress]

CE:
You never answered. How does CIT (you) decide what parts of the witnesses statements to keep and which to ignore. You do acknowledge the fact some of their statements are in fact ignored, don't you?

Still nobody presented a single SoC witness. Will you be the first? No.