10 story hole in WTC 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you believe in the pancake theory, then it is up to you to come up with a calculation for how long it would take each floor to collapse according to that theory. But any number greater than .01 seconds will not fit the observed evidence of a CD.

This is not a linear event. You continue in this fallacy born of your inability to grasp one of the first lessons in high school physics, that an acelleration means that travelling a set distance will take less time for each interval.

At an acelleration of 8.8 m/s2 ( 90% the acelleration due to gravity ) an object falling an initial 3 meters will do so in 0.826 seconds.
It will fall the next 3 meters in 0.342 seconds and the next 3 meters after that in 0.262 seconds, the next 3 meters in 0.221 seconds (that's 4 floors worth so far and it has taken 1.65 seconds)

5 floors, 15 meters takes 1.846 seconds, it would take 5.661 seconds to fall 141 meters, and 418 meters takes 9.75 seconds total.


That is at 10% LESS acelleration than free fall!

Even with the most parsimonious estimates of time of collapse all three buildings fell at less than 90% the rate a free falling (dense) object would.

If WTC 7 took 6.6 seconds to fall and it was 141 meters tall then it fell at an average acelleration of 6.47 m/s2 or 2/3rds the rate of free fall!!! Like I said this ignores the fact of the previous 10 or so seconds during which the center of the building was collapsing.
 
jaydeehess:

I forgot to put in 'until about 2 p.m.' My bad

I also said 'see post #807' which has the quotes from the NIST report and includes the 'until about 2 p.m.'

I get a 'Forbidden' msg. when i click on the link you posted but it's probably the fires on the 11th and 12th floors on the east side at the south corner, that first appeared about 2:00 to 2:30.

There are no reports or signs of fire on the 5th or 6th floor in the eastern part of WTC 7.
A diesel fire, hot enough to weaken the built up core columns, would need maximum air flow and would produce lots of smoke.

There were no reports of debris damage to the eastern part of WTC 7 so how did this fire get started ? How did the double wall pipe get severed in the area near columns 79, 80, or 81 ?

********************************************************
BTW
NIST did reassess it's damage assessment on the '10 storey gouge' but not in Oct. of '06 like Gravy said.

NIST Final 4-5-05 pg 15

South face Damage
middle 1/4 - 1/3 width south face, 10th floor to ground

Notice that the gouged out is gone ?

NIST gave up the gouge nearly 2 years ago!

Why do you guys and gals still believe it existed ?


********************************************************

According to the NIST report:

There were no reports of fires in the proximity of the initiating event, that led to the collapse of WTC 7,

until about 2:00 p.m.


NIST Apx. L pg. 22 - 26

From 11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

Looking from the southeast corner of the south face:

Fire seen on floor 14* on the south face
Fire on floor 14 moved toward the east

* NIST Final 4-4-05 pg 21
Fire on floor 12; area above covered with smoke
Fire on floors 11-12 moved to the east face and progressed to the north

2:00 to 2:30
"fires on east face floors 11 and 12 at the SW corner........fires progressing north"
"Around 3:00 p.m., fires on floors 7 and 12 along north face"
"Around 4:45 p.m. ........Floor 12 was burned out by this time"

There were no other reports of fire near the initiating event.

********************************************************

You didn't answer this question yet.
Are you trying to imply that those tremendous fires were in WTC 7 ?
 
jaydeehess:

I forgot to put in 'until about 2 p.m.' My bad

I also said 'see post #807' which has the quotes from the NIST report and includes the 'until about 2 p.m.'

I get a 'Forbidden' msg. when i click on the link you posted but it's probably the fires on the 11th and 12th floors on the east side at the south corner, that first appeared about 2:00 to 2:30.

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_fire.html third photo down the page.



There are no reports or signs of fire on the 5th or 6th floor in the eastern part of WTC 7.
A diesel fire, hot enough to weaken the built up core columns, would need maximum air flow and would produce lots of smoke.

There were no reports of debris damage to the eastern part of WTC 7 so how did this fire get started ? How did the double wall pipe get severed in the area near columns 79, 80, or 81 ?

The fire likely started further west and spread east. It could have started several floors below and spread upward through debris damage punctures in the floor pan. Are you suggesting now that the fires were deliberatly set? Do you have any evidence of this other than you can't envision how they got started?

If there was a peircing of the floor pan above the deisel room the smoke may well be exiting out that hole while air is coming into the room via the normal path by which the room in ventilated and the deisel supplied with air. That would put the smoke exiting the building on floors above that at which the fire is.

Given that the elevator cars were ejected it is also possible that large debris came through the south wall at the 14th floor , entered the elevator shaft jamming at the 6th or 7th floor, severing the elevator cables and any safety devices and causing the cars to plummet until they hit the top of that piece of debris which forces them out at the 8th floor. The impact first of the debris and then the elevator cars hitting it bends a column or columns near the elevator shaft and punctures(but not neccessarily severs) a deisel line, the deisel is running since the power to the building went out and the pooling fuel eventually ignites and continues to be fed by the supply system.(the smoke exiting the closed deisel room via the elevator shaft and through any floor above) The ensuing fire continues to weaken the columns that have already been bent out of shape by impact. The load on them is already higher than normal due to the severing of south wall perimeter columns which places more load (catenary action) on the core columns. The columns being heated compress under the load and thus load is shifted to nearby columns but this is in an area where loads are distributed in a way unique to WTC 7. This shifting of loads also causes other stresses on the columns and transfer beams that were never designed for. At some point the loads and no longer be distributed and one column fails completely initiating a dominoe effect first vertically and then with falling debris from above , also horizontally through the south columns responsible for carrying the building bulk over the original Co-Ed building ( a cantilever system with support columns on the north and south sides of the original Con-Ed) to fail on their south end pulling the mass obove the Con-Ed building to the south into the core area.



YES, I know I just made this up. i did so with a basic knowledge of how the building was constructed and what the situation in WTC 7 was following the collapse of #1.
You, on the other hand are making your story up based soley on the fact that the building collapsed and made a big noise as it did so. period, end stop

********************************************************


There were no other reports of fire near the initiating event.

Where the smoke exits is not neccessarily where the fire is. (similar to where your ceiling is leaking is not neccessarily where the leak in the roof is.)

********************************************************

You didn't answer this question yet.
Are you trying to imply that those tremendous fires were in WTC 7 ?


Perhaps that one witness was referring to the general area of the WTC complex. It really makes no difference. There were major fires in WTC 7!!
 
Last edited:
Anyone seen the Craig Bartmer video?

Any explanation?

I hate to quote myself...but anyone?

It was recently in an article on prison planet.

It's pretty much like the EMT email...except it's a real guy speaking to dylan avery.
 
I hate to quote myself...but anyone?

It was recently in an article on prison planet.

It's pretty much like the EMT email...except it's a real guy speaking to dylan avery.

just a thought but more people will respond if you post a link rather than require them to look for it. I know I would be more inclined to.
 
Thats the one thanx.

The fire likely started further west and spread east. It could have started several floors below and spread upward through debris damage punctures in the floor pan. Are you suggesting now that the fires were deliberatly set? Do you have any evidence of this other than you can't envision how they got started?
I don't know how the fires got started and i don't consider it an issue.
However, i would put 'electrical short' at or near the top of the list.

If there was a peircing of the floor pan above the deisel room the smoke may well be exiting out that hole while air is coming into the room via the normal path by which the room in ventilated and the deisel supplied with air. That would put the smoke exiting the building on floors above that at which the fire is.
[By 'diesel room', do you mean the east mechanical room? pg 11 ]

Smoke would also be exiting thru the diesel room vents.

The 2 story mechanical room it in the center of the east side.
There are no reports of damage or fire in this area.
To damage the mechanical room, debris would have to bust thru floors 7 & 8. The smoke would be coming back up thru the debris hole.

NIST pg 18

At 12:10 to 12:15 p.m.

No heavy dust or smoke on floor 8

Cubicle fire on west wall of floor 7

Given that the elevator cars were ejected it is also possible that large debris came through the south wall at the 14th floor , entered the elevator shaft jamming at the 6th or 7th floor, severing the elevator cables and any safety devices and causing the cars to plummet until they hit the top of that piece of debris which forces them out at the 8th floor.
That's good. Put it in the 'anything's possible' file.
It is still west of the mechanical area.
In any case, it's speculation, not evidence; but i like your thinking.

The impact first of the debris and then the elevator cars hitting it bends a column or columns near the elevator shaft and punctures(but not neccessarily severs) a deisel line, the deisel is running since the power to the building went out and the pooling fuel eventually ignites and continues to be fed by the supply system.
so far, so good.
(the smoke exiting the closed deisel room via the elevator shaft and through any floor above)
If the diesel engines are running, the louvers are open.

The ensuing fire continues to weaken the columns that have already been bent out of shape by impact. The load on them is already higher than normal due to the severing of south wall perimeter columns which places more load (catenary action) on the core columns. The columns being heated compress under the load and thus load is shifted to nearby columns but this is in an area where loads are distributed in a way unique to WTC 7. This shifting of loads also causes other stresses on the columns and transfer beams that were never designed for. At some point the loads and no longer be distributed and one column fails completely initiating a dominoe effect first vertically and then with falling debris from above , also horizontally
It's about this horizontal thing.

Every floor must have shear strength in both directions.
[bracing to keep the columns from bending to the side]
The lower floors of a 47 story building must have a great deal of shear strength to handle the stresses of holding up 47 floor building in a hurricane.
Floors falling down will tear away, they will not make 15 massive support columns buckle to the side.
I'm just a carpenter, but this is an easy one.

YES, I know I just made this up. i did so with a basic knowledge of how the building was constructed and what the situation in WTC 7 was following the collapse of #1.
You, on the other hand are making your story up based soley on the fact that the building collapsed and made a big noise as it did so. period, end stop
I am basing my belief on what i see in the videos of WTC 7

First, the east penthouse falls. This takes about 5 - 7 seconds.

During this time, there is a hole being created so the east and west walls will fall inward.

Next, the rest of the center falls just before the outer walls, drawing them in.

The building falls very fast, some say at or near freefall, ......whatever.

The building falls mostly straight down and lands in a pile, mostly within its original footprint.

The surrounding buildings were of no concern. [imho]


wtc7debris3bw2.jpg


Daryl was describing what he had just seen and heard.

What he described is consistent with a building implosion.
[no two implosions are exactly the same]

"....a clap of thunder.........about a second later the bottom floor caved out...."

The sound of the core of WTC 7 falling would be a rumbling, like distant thunder.
An explosion [or many explosions in rapid succession] sounds like thunder near by [ 2 - 4 sec. delay], that goes Ka-boom, rumble. [imho]
 
I don't know how the fires got started and i don't consider it an issue.
However, i would put 'electrical short' at or near the top of the list.

Hrrmm. What did start the fires? I'm not too sure myself. I thought it was the debris that hit it caused the fires; indirectly or otherwise. Anyone else want to add some input on this?

Daryl was describing what he had just seen and heard.

Oh, Daryl again. The NYU med student with no experience in any relevant fields. I refuted this in the other thread ("C7 and C4"). Strangely, you never replied to my latest post.

What he described is consistent with a building implosion.
[no two implosions are exactly the same]

"....a clap of thunder.........about a second later the bottom floor caved out...."

A clap of thunder. That's it. Are you saying that only demolition charges (or other explosive device) could create this noise? Bear in mind that the building was collapsing.

The sound of the core of WTC 7 falling would be a rumbling, like distant thunder.

What makes you say this? From memory, steel failing actually makes a very loud bang. There's certainly a few videos hanging around on youtube or something that show this.

An explosion [or many explosions in rapid succession] sounds like thunder near by [ 2 - 4 sec. delay], that goes Ka-boom, rumble. [imho]

An explosion? Where does he say anything about an explosion? He said a clap of thunder. Even if it was an explosion, it does not mean that it was caused by a bomb.

Again, are you saying that only demolition charges (or other explosive device) could create these noises (or explosions)? Bear in mind that the building was collapsing.
 
I'm just a carpenter, but this is an easy one.
Then why is it so difficult for you to understand how wrong you are about this:

Chris Sarns AKA Christopher 7 said:
The ones who said the building was fully involved were wrong.

I can better assess the damage, sitting here at my computer 5 years later, because i can see the other 2 [perhaps 3] sides of wtc 7 that the firefighter could not see.

I am basing my belief on what i see in the videos of WTC 7
How about talking to the people who were there?

Daryl was describing what he had just seen and heard.

What he described is consistent with a building implosion.
[no two implosions are exactly the same]

"....a clap of thunder.........about a second later the bottom floor caved out...."

The sound of the core of WTC 7 falling would be a rumbling, like distant thunder.

An explosion [or many explosions in rapid succession] sounds like thunder near by [ 2 - 4 sec. delay], that goes Ka-boom, rumble. [imho]
More arguments from ignorance. Do you ever run out?

When structural steel fails suddenly, it makes an explosive sound. http://craneaccidents.com/bigblue.mpg

And there you have it. Please stop to think. You are making a fool of yourself.
 
Then why is it so difficult for you to understand how wrong you are about this:
What makes you so sure i'm wrong ?

How about talking to the people who were there?
Do you think we should all track these people down and ask them ?

More arguments from ignorance. Do you ever run out?
When structural steel fails suddenly, it makes an explosive sound. http://craneaccidents.com/bigblue.mpg
You are comparing a crane outside with the collapse of the core of a building but you have demonstrated that there are two possible explanations.

You did not dispute the following:
 
The 2 story mechanical room it in the center of the east side.

There are no reports of damage or fire in this area.

To damage the mechanical room, debris would have to bust thru floors 7 & 8.
The smoke would be coming back up thru the debris hole.

NIST pg 18

At 12:10 to 12:15 p.m.

No heavy dust or smoke on floor 8

Cubicle fire on west wall of floor 7



If the diesel engines are running, the louvers are open.

Smoke would be pouring out of the louver vents
 
Last edited:
Hrrmm. What did start the fires? I'm not too sure myself. I thought it was the debris that hit it caused the fires; indirectly or otherwise. Anyone else want to add some input on this?
Anything other than responding to the lack of damage and fire to the mechanical room.

Oh, Daryl again. The NYU med student with no experience in any relevant fields. I refuted this in the other thread ("C7 and C4").
One does not have to be an expert at anything to describe what they heard and saw.

A clap of thunder. That's it. Are you saying that only demolition charges (or other explosive device) could create this noise? Bear in mind that the building was collapsing.
No.
It could have been steel breaking, as Gravy pointed out.
or
It could be a large explosion, or many small explosions in rapid succession.
 
You still haven't explained how an air-to-air missile would create such a large hole in a building.

It is now unclear to me what caused the gouge in the building or if it ever existed. Some here are saying the gouge is from the 10th floor to the bottom on the south side. There is reported damage on the 14th floor with black smoking emanating from the area.

The missile impact I saw taken by FOX cameraman Jack Taliercio shows debris flying out at a high rate of speed. I am now unsure such a massive hole could have been made by an air-to-air missile.
 
Does this picture not show the extend of the fires in WTC7?

(I have not followed the whole thread, so maybe this picture is well known. If so, sorry.)

A lot of this smoke in the photo is from building WTC 6 which was severely on fire after the collapse of WTC 1 on top of it.
 
Forgive me if this is an unnecessary contribution.
But I've been reading this thread for the first time. I got through the first page of posts and I noticed by that point no one had provided either...
1. The "Steve Spak photo". Which is the photo of the south face of 7 WTC which first began circulating last year and which clearly shows the "gouge" (or "hole") in the south face of the building which several firefighters reported witnessing up close while standing at the base of the building.
and 2. the Firehouse Magazine interviews with those firefighters in which the hole in the face of the building is described.

I just didn't want to have to read through all 22 pages of the thread to confirm whether or not this information has been provided.
But in the off chance that it is has not been, I will be glad to provide it.
 
Last edited:
The 20,000 gallons of fuel were recovered in the cleanup
[FEMA pg 15]

How do we know if this is true. The entire 20,000 gallons that supposedly soaked into the ground was retrieved? Where is the evidence there were environmental hazzard crews on the ground to retrieve the oil?

It seems to me if a decision was made to pull WTC7 then it would be necessary to first burn off the oil.
 
Forgive me if this is an unnecessary contribution.
But I've been reading this thread for the first time. I got through the first page of posts and I noticed by that point no one had provided either...
1. The "Steve Spak photo". Which is the photo of the south face of 7 WTC which first began circulating last year and which clearly shows the "gouge" (or "hole") in the south face of the building which several firefighters reported witnessing up close while standing at the base of the building.
and 2. the Firehouse Magazine interviews with those firefighters in which the hole in the face of the building is described.

I just didn't want to have to read through all 22 pages of the thread to confirm whether or not this information has been provided.
But in the off chance that it is has not been, I will be glad to provide it.

I am not entirely familiar with the "gouge debate" so please provide the photo.
 
I don't know how you can have such a strong opinion when it's such a trivial matter to prove this contention wrong :

30 W Broadway -
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l131/Ignatz_CT/wtc7localdamage1.jpg

The Verizon building -

http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l131/Ignatz_CT/verizondamagedetail-2.jpg

Why is this damage to 30 West Broadway only to the top of the building and not at the bottom? Where exactly is this damaged building in relation to WTC 7?

The floors on 30 West Broadway look burnt.

Damage to only the top of a building.....I wonder.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom