10 story hole in WTC 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department
The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" -


Richard Banaciski
"They told us to get out of there because they were worried about 7 World Trade Center, which is right behind it, coming down. We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone. We could look right out over to where the Trade Centers were because we were that high up. Looking over the smaller buildings. I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on........



All the heavy smoke from the SW corner???
db_Magnum1.jpg

wtc7fire1.jpg
 
You are assuming that this huge piece of debris penetrated WTC 7 nearly 100' as it would have to do in order to eject 2 elevator cars.

the entire building is only 140' deep from south to north face

You have a better explanation for the ejected cars? (I do hope you are not buying the craziness of magic air-to-air missiles)
 
the entire building is only 140' deep from south to north face

You have a better explanation for the ejected cars? (I do hope you are not buying the craziness of magic air-to-air missiles)

A missile hit would be a better explanation.

Also, why not download the NOAA aerial photo of Ground Zero and take a look at the black missile crater and the burnt vehicles in the open parking area northwest of the WTC complex. This is where the second missile hit–passing by the Woolworth building parallel to Barclay Street and hitting in the open parking area. This is what you call EVIDENCE.
 
This is what you call EVIDENCE.

And I can show you a neat trick with a folded $20 note.

Some people, and you're definately one of them, will see whatever it is they want to see, regardless of how stupid it is.
 
And I can show you a neat trick with a folded $20 note.

Some people, and you're definately one of them, will see whatever it is they want to see, regardless of how stupid it is.

Have you seen the NOAA photo?

Is there any other explanation for the black crater and burnt vehicles?
 
Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department

'It had very heavy fire on many floors."

There were no reports of fires in the proximity of the initiating event*, that led to the collapse of WTC 7, until about 2:00 p.m.

NIST Apx. L pg. 22 - 26

2:00 to 2:30
"fires on east face floors 11 and 12 at the SW corner........fires progressing north"
"Around 3:00 p.m., fires on floors 7 and 12 along north face"
"Around 4:45 p.m. ........Floor 12 was burned out by this time"

*pg 31


There were no other reports of fire near the initiating event.


jdh said:
Richard Banaciski:
"I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on."

jdh:
All the heavy smoke from the SW corner???
Are you trying to imply that those tremendous fires were in WTC 7 ?
 
No. I dont believe there was any such gouge, there is no evidence nor any way it could have occurred.

still hanging in there Chris? They still haven't answered the first question?

I got a reminder from Jref so I'm posting one post. Got no time for more.



Kader Toy Factory:
http://www.ilo.org/encyclopedia/?doc&nd=857100058&nh=0
The E-shaped building was a four-storey structure composed of concrete slabs supported by a structural steel frame.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCormick_Place
The gleaming white building burned down in 1967, a shocking event as it was largely steel and concrete and was thought to be fireproof. However, the exhibits at the time were highly flammable and there were inadequate sprinklers and hydrants, thus the fire spread quickly and destructively,

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hereford/worcs/6105942.stm
Major fire at toilet paper plant
"Intense heat buckled the steel girders holding the roof."
(Photo looks like a small, 4 storey concrete building, full of intense orange flames.)

All 3 are small buildings made of reinforced concrete with intense fire occupying the entire building interior. Not comparable at all to the WTC which were steel skyscrapers and fire only in a small part of the overall structure.
People survived in the Towers up to the moment of collapse – the insides of the buildings were largely at room temperature or thereabouts.

In the toilet paper plant fire it says steel girders buckled. OK, but in the WTC, steel girders were chopped up in short lengths and some of them were ejected upwards and outwards into the air. Buckling by itself would only lead to the building sagging, not being pulverized!

Some 9/11 Lyers have been saying there were no explosions because they are not heard by the videos broadcast by the corporate controlled media. Note that the media are owned by corporations (6 companies control 96% of the media – see http://www.mediachannel.org/ownership/front.shtml#chart ) and they are controlled by the super-rich – the same powerful few who control the CFR, CIA, and the war machine. Unfortunately, we have to come to grips with the fact that this is a big conspiracy coming from the top of our society, from the Owners, and the top is totally corrupt – the fish stinks from the head. In other words, the sounds of explosions could easily have been muffled out for TV viewers.

Distortion in the media for propaganda purposes is the rule, objectivity is the exception or exists only in theory.

However, there are videos of fireman describing the explosion (bam, bam, bam – a floor at a time, you know the one) and I recently was pointed to this short one, only 17 seconds, where you can clearly hear a big explosion. The camera goes off looking for the source of the sound, pointing upwards, apparently up into the towers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I#C40Hv04n8GU
you can very clearly hear a big explosion coming apparently from the towers and a policeman saying, "sounds like an explosion, I know" meaning it was not the first time he is hearing this.

The essence of it is that the collapses of WTC 1, 2 and 7 not only look like controlled demolitions, they look ONLY like CD’s. This is the only known phenomenon that even closely resembles what we saw on 9/11, and they fit all the characteristics, such as free fall speed, which clearly is only possible if the supporting columns are blown out.

This is why I say it is too obvious and I don’t have patience to discuss this with people who to all appearences are either totally brainwashed, or maybe even being paid to cover up the conspiracy this way – that is with case-hardened 9/11 Lyers.
 
No. I dont believe there was any such gouge, there is no evidence nor any way it could have occurred.

I got a reminder from Jref so I'm posting one post. Got no time for more.

The towers did not look anything like a CD. Debunked!

What speed did the fall out? Show your work please. You should have taken physics!

The only people telling lies are from the truth movement.

There is photo evidence there was damage from the towers falling and damaging WTC7. Wrong on your nor any way idea. Debunked!
 
A 3rd possibility, other than brainwashed or shill, is confusion or obfuscation. You bring up too many moot points and then you can't keep track of them.

Keep it simple. It fits all the characteristics of a CD, and no other known phenomenon has these characteristics.
 
A 3rd possibility, other than brainwashed or shill, is confusion or obfuscation. You bring up too many moot points and then you can't keep track of them.

Keep it simple. It fits all the characteristics of a CD, and no other known phenomenon has these characteristics.

No explosives were used. CD debunked! You have no proof.

If you could only use physics you could calculate some of this stuff. You do not know what speed the towers fell at do you?

All you have is what your truth movement spoon feeds you. Do you have any facts?

The only people brainwashed are those in the cult movement of truth. So how did they plant the explosives? Did they use thermite or thermate?
 
A 3rd possibility, other than brainwashed or shill, is confusion or obfuscation. You bring up too many moot points and then you can't keep track of them.

Keep it simple. It fits all the characteristics of a CD, and no other known phenomenon has these characteristics.

Are you sticking with you 110 seconds for the total time the WTC should have fallen; and can you show your numbers, your work, your calculations?
 
Last edited:
UH, ohkay now, let's take this real slow now, i know heavy brainwashing has deleterious effects on your brain function. So this is going to be reaaalll eeazy, now

1. video evidence
get a clock or a watch. have you seen one of those before? Ask you mommy, maybe she has. Then get a video. Find somebody who can read the clock. clock the collapse.

2. Ok, this is a little bit harder but you can do it. You need to know a little bit of arithmetic and measures.

We'll keep it reeaaal simple. Let's say each floor pancakes really fast - say in one second flat.
There are 110 floors.
How many seconds. Take your time now.
Ok, give up?
Ok i will tell you.
It's 110 seconds.
Almost two minutes. Those are marked by the long hand on the clock, see?

This is so wrong it has made the funniest post for a truther. Your lack of physics is showing on this post. You have no idea how momentum works and proved it above.

Do you want to update your time and show your calculations? (got physics?)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
The essence of it is that the collapses of WTC 1, 2 and 7 not only look like controlled demolitions, they look ONLY like CD’s. This is the only known phenomenon that even closely resembles what we saw on 9/11, and they fit all the characteristics, such as free fall speed, which clearly is only possible if the supporting columns are blown out.

This is why I say it is too obvious ...

Googling for a list of characteristics common to WTC and CD, I hit on this:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/index.html

It's about the twin towers which were not classic CD but it's a good list nevertheless.
:boggled:

Please, don't debunk your claims yourself.
Leave some fun for the other people on this forum ...
 
Here we go

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/demolition.html

Observing the collapse of 47-story WTC 7 shows it to have all of the features of an implosion engineered by controlled demolition.
  • The collapse of the main structure commences suddenly (several seconds after the penthouse falls).
  • The building sinks in a precisely vertical manner into its footprint.
  • Puffs of dust emerge from the building's facade early in the event.
  • The collapse is total, producing a rubble pile only about three stories high.
  • The main structure collapses totally in under 7 seconds, only about a second slower than it would take a brick dropped from the building's roof to reach the ground in a vacuum.
 
Does this picture not show the extend of the fires in WTC7?

(I have not followed the whole thread, so maybe this picture is well known. If so, sorry.)
 
Does this picture not show the extend of the fires in WTC7?

(I have not followed the whole thread, so maybe this picture is well known. If so, sorry.)

The truther will say it is smoke. But it looks like about 100,000 times more smoke than my back yard fire too hot to get close to.

Smoke = fire; lots of smoke = lots of fire

Good photo!
 
If you believe in the pancake theory, then it is up to you to come up with a calculation for how long it would take each floor to collapse according to that theory. But any number greater than .01 seconds will not fit the observed evidence of a CD.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom