Yes.
Memes are a way of describing how ideas move, and grow and gather support. They represent groups of like-minded Human Beings. But altogether they are the action of idea(s) made so by those who support them.
They can even branch out into sub systems and sometime such systems disconnect entirely from their parent Meme and join another or stand alone.
And quite frankly i don't care if there are people out there, billions of people even, who believe in this nonsense. Let them pray away cancer. Let them drive out demons out of their children and keep them from receiving medical care. Let them kill each-other over their faith. As long as I'm at a comfortable distance.
Quite frankly, this reinforces what I am saying in regard to the Power aspect, in terms of sheer numbers.
It might in fact be completely stupid to even think that anything could eradicate wooism and thus intelligence is better used for other purposes altogether.
You might have to arrange ahead of the event for to be safe and comfortable and non affected by any of those things you listed...as more sensible than simply praying, wishing or hoping you will be safe from it.
Quote:
I have been told that this science exists. And that people do take it seriously.
No kidding. Where do you think your computer and the software that is running on it comes from?
Wishful thinking? Prayer?
I was referring to the specific science which proves that prayer is illusion and delusional.
Quote:
I will look into this "Science proves that prayer is nothing but illusion and delusion' more closely to see how it actually helps the cause of eradicating wooism.
If you really want to "eradicate wooism" then educating people about how to avoid being tricked by others and by themselves is a pretty good starting point. But it's largely an impossible task since, while a lot of people believe in the power of prayer and god and magic and so on, there are more people who WANT to believe in that. They WANT the world to be like that, and nothing but continuous doubt could make them face this uncomfortable reality.
So ‘wooism’ is that which tricks the self and others. It is largely an impossible task because people want the world to be ‘like that’ and continuous doubt will get them accepting the reality they are in (comfortable or otherwise.)?
My recent observations regarding Magicians being perpetrators of wooism have much merit then.
The best thing I can do is be aware of the tricks I play on myself or allow others to play on me and from that awareness, find the way to change so I don’t trick myself, trick others or allow others to trick me.
This way, while I wouldn’t have much say in other people trying to trick me, I can point out to them I am on to their tricky ways, and when I see them trying their tricks on others, I can speak up about it.
I think though that you are very correct when you say:
“They WANT the world to be like that...”
I understand this is also true of the ‘Whop-de-doers’ who want the world to be nothing worth truly trying to preserve.
Perhaps the two extremes are no more or less than reflections of each other. Those who see the world as a magic place wrought from the hand of some invisible mind, but corrupted by those who couldn’t care less and don’t see the big deal (and so are interfering with the process) and those who don’t think much at all about the whole thing, and see those that do as being somehow delusional and in need of a good truckload of doubt dumped over them, and infused into them.
Somewhere in all this is a ‘middle path’.
1: There is no actual NEED to believe Consciousness or the universe as being the product of some invisible creator being. The fact that it and Consciousness exists is good enough reason to support it.
2: There is no sense in marginalising we or the universe as being nothing special – not worth preserving and there is no sense believing there is no reasonable need or requirement to personally do anything which will help that process
In regard to the survival and nurturing of human consciousness which came from a mindless process, I suspect the ‘woos’ are slightly more useful than the ‘whop-de-dos’ to that process...but only slightly...maybe not significantly.
I would consider then that both the woowoo and the whop-de-do are being tricky and neither are particularly good company to be in the presence of, let alone to be supporting either by being one or the other.