Navigator
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2004
- Messages
- 7,324
That's why you need to be able to test any insights you gain this way against reality before putting any trust in them.
Well that answers the question I asked:
The Claim: Prayer assisted my hitchhiking for 3-4 months without luggage or money.
The Argument why this worked: 'we vastly underestimate the frequency of coincidence.' (ie prayer did not help feed and shelter me etc. - it was coincidence.)
The trust issue:
Lets say that you decide to test my claim regarding prayer and without luggage or money, set out on the road hitchhiking.
Your aim is to show that you can reproduce the same without any prayer involved.
After 3 days of sleeping under bridges and not having had enough to eat, you call a halt to the experiment.
Your aim is to show that you can reproduce the same without any prayer involved.
After 3 days of sleeping under bridges and not having had enough to eat, you call a halt to the experiment.
The question:
Q: What would that tell you about your belief regarding how we vastly underestimate the frequency with which coincidences occur?
Q: What would that tell you about your belief regarding how we vastly underestimate the frequency with which coincidences occur?
Last edited: