Round and round and round we go (no number, just exasperation)
The references in Kings and Chronicles are for ordinary years, not leap years.
Nisan or Aviv is the first month of the year in the Jewish calendar; the name changed to Nisan with the Babylonian exile but a name change is not probative of anything in particular. The bible isn't giving instructions on the calendar, it's giving you some history. For the workings of the calendar, the resources include the Bible, Josephus, Jewish history and tradition.
I know when Hillel II's mathematical rule states to insert the intercalary months. However, we are not discussing post 4th century CE years.
I don't understand your question. What is wrong with saying "the first month" without naming it?20120816.0155
@Agatha, #3499
It is true that Passover is held on the first month of the year. But why did the Israelites not use Abib for the first month? During the time of Solomon, there was Ziv (second month), Ethanim (seventh month), and Bul (eighth month). Why was Aviv not used in the following: Exodus 40;2, 17; Ezekiel 45:18; 2 Chronicle 29:3, 17; Ezra 10:17; Joshua 4:19; Daniel 10:4; etc.? Why is there no thirteenth month provision in 1 Kings 4:7-19 and 1 Chronicle 27:1-15 if a lunisolar calendar had been in used?
The references in Kings and Chronicles are for ordinary years, not leap years.
Nisan or Aviv is the first month of the year in the Jewish calendar; the name changed to Nisan with the Babylonian exile but a name change is not probative of anything in particular. The bible isn't giving instructions on the calendar, it's giving you some history. For the workings of the calendar, the resources include the Bible, Josephus, Jewish history and tradition.
Wiki said:The Bible does not directly mention the addition of "embolismic" or intercalary months. However, without the insertion of embolismic months, Jewish festivals would gradually shift outside of the seasons required by the Torah. This has been ruled as implying a requirement for the insertion of embolismic months to reconcile the lunar cycles to the seasons, which are integral to solar yearly cycles.
When the observational form of the calendar was in use, whether or not an embolismic month was announced after the "last month" (Adar) depended on 'aviv [i.e.the ripeness of barley], fruits of trees, and the equinox. On two of these grounds it should be intercalated, but not on one of them alone. It may be noted that in the Bible the name of the first month, Aviv, literally means "spring". Thus, if Adar was over and Spring had not yet arrived, an additional month was observed.
Taqsh in late spring/early summer, figs later in the summer/early autumn. Why?Tell me, when is the fruiting season of the fig tree?
I know when Hillel II's mathematical rule states to insert the intercalary months. However, we are not discussing post 4th century CE years.