So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

Its odd that you ask for evidence and proof - then refute all you claim by posting this. Classic stuff Roger. Yet you wont have read it all and wont understand what it means anyway. The simple explanation Roger - you post stuff that 'debunks' yourself. Classic.

The post supports my points. Not my fault if you are not adult enough to admit it.
 
You have no evidence of a steel skyscraper in the US. collapsing from fire before or after 9/11.

You are the one claiming it was "pulled".

Show us evidence of a comparable building being "pulled"....

unless you cannot honestly tell the difference between a 2 story building an WTC7 :big:
 
NO, i have proven my point that the fire commader or fire chief can bring a building down.

Thanks again for showing you cannot be adult enough to accept facts.


You compared, insanely, a two-story structure with a massive skyscraper. You made a fool of yourself again. Nobody thinks that the FDNY can bring down a skyscraper in an emergency, or at any other time, because it takes too long.

I don't care how ill you are, or are pretending to be: reality is what it is.
 
Last edited:
You are the one claiming it was "pulled".

I am not claiming i am going by the facts shown. You do know what facts are?

If you beleive Chief Nigro and CHief Hayden then you have to believe that the firemen were out of the building BEFORE the phone call. So the fire commader could have only been talking about the building when he stated PULL IT becasue the firemen were already out of the building.
 
The post supports my points. Not my fault if you are not adult enough to admit it.

Like i said. You didnt read it or understand what it says but posted it anyway. It 'debunks' everything you have said in this thread Roger. You just cant read or comprehend what is written. That is why you go round and round and achieve nothing. You cant read Roger. You have a limited attention span.
 
Then what does the following mean?

and we will be taking the building down under emergency orders,” said Lincoln Fire Chief Kent Hulett.


It means they will contract out the demolition of the building to an excavation company. which they did. and i linked to. they simply made the determination that the structure was unsafe. which fire departments do daily.
 
You compared, insanely, a two-story structure with a massive skyscraper. .

I was not comparing anything.

Please read the post. I was making a point that the fire commander or fire chief can bring down a buidling in an emergency.
 
Question for those demanding serial numbers...

I have, politely, asked you a question in the above thread, would you be so kind as to answer it.
 
Last edited:
I am not claiming i am going by the facts shown. You do know what facts are?

If you beleive Chief Nigro and CHief Hayden then you have to believe that the firemen were out of the building BEFORE the phone call. So the fire commader could have only been talking about the building when he stated PULL IT becasue the firemen were already out of the building.

...even though you have no evidence of a 40+ story building ever being "pulled" before?
 
...even though you have no evidence of a 40+ story building ever being "pulled" before?


But i do have evidence that fire commanders and fire chiefs can bring a building down.

And you have no evidence of a steel skyscraper in the US collapsing from fire before.
 
well the call had to be made after the firemen were out due to the facts and for several basic, common sense reasons.

1. Chief nigro stated he pulled the firemen out early in the day without talking to anyone.

2. Chief hayden supports the fact of the firemen pulled out early in the day.

3. What fire commander is going to make a call while the firemen are in a unstable building.
FAIL. I said that you have to provide evidence. Your twisted sense does not fulfill the challenge. Provide phone records that back up your "common sense."
 
again

http://www.lincolncourier.com/archive/x1277295535/Fire-focus-shifts-to-helping-victims


Quote:
Emergency operations involved the assistance of the following public agencies and organizations:
Mutual aid fire departments: Lincoln Rural, Atlanta, Mount Pulaski, Beason, Elkhart, Latham, New Holland, Sherman, Williamsville, Warrensburg, Bloomington, Decatur, MABAS Division 46 and 51.
Other agencies and organizations: Logan County Paramedic Association, Logan County E-911 Dispatch Center, Logan County Emergency Management Agency, Lincoln Police Department, Logan County Sheriff’s Department, Illinois State Police, Lincoln Public Works Department, Salvation Army of Macon County, American Red Cross, Goodman’s Excavating of Lincoln, AmerenCILCO utility company and American Water Company.
The Lincoln Fire Department expresses thanks for all the assistance from these agencies and organizations and the numerous individuals and businesses that helped or offered to help.
The cause of the fire is still under investigation.


After the fire burned out late Friday night, emergency workers determined the building had to come down. They brought in a large backhoe, which went to work as firefighters continued spraying down the still-smoking rubble.
They worked for some time in the only pool of light in downtown Lincoln. AmerenCILCO workers had cut power to a grid serving about 1,200 people to prevent complications with the fire earlier that night, so lights were brought in to guide the demolition process.
 
Last edited:
But i do have evidence that fire commanders and fire chiefs can bring a building down.

And you have no evidence of a steel skyscraper in the US collapsing from fire before.

other than 7
theres no evidence of a steel skyscraper getting hit by another steel skyscraper that was more than twice as tall that was hit by an airliner on purpose

so there is no comparable event in history
but steel buildings will collapse in a fire if the fire is left to burn
 
Then what does the following mean?

and we will be taking the building down under emergency orders,” said Lincoln Fire Chief Kent Hulett.

Nothing. Squat. It's a 100 year old Victorian wood house.

All they had to do was call in a bulldozer after the fire was out and the city or the owner's insurance company paid for it. This has no relevance to the demolition of a 47 floor steel building.

http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2009/04/23/news/doc49efa35aca9f7691735642.txt

NYC uses contractors to clean up after a building collapse.

(Google makes you dumber, if that is possible.)
 
You have no evidence of a steel skyscraper in the US. collapsing from fire before or after 9/11.

Therefore no evidnece to support the official story.
Lol an anomalous event is NOT evidence. And you also fail to mention those other sky scrapers hadn't been hit by planes. And on the same token every steel sky scraper that has been hit by a plane, experienced unabaited fires, had steel stripped of fire proofing and had a steel core collumn has collapsed.
 
so there is no comparable event in history
but steel buildings will collapse in a fire if the fire is left to burn

WRONG.

Other steel skyscrapers have had longer lasting fires and as much or more damage then 7 and still did not collapse.
 
WRONG.

Other steel skyscrapers have had longer lasting fires and as much or more damage then 7 and still did not collapse.

No other fire had no firefighting and no buiding, anywhere was all-steel design and had no masonry for fireproofing.
 
No other fire had no firefighting and no buiding, anywhere was all-steel design and had no masonry for fireproofing.

Other steel skyscrapers have had longer lasting fires and as much or more damage then 7 and still did not collapse.
 

Back
Top Bottom