So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

I have spelled out as comprehensively as humanly possible why nobody thinks Nigro is lying about anything and this hopeless so-and-so is asking for the hundredth time if I'm saying that Nigro is lying. Can he read what I post? Evidently not. Why am I bothering?

So you would have to agree then that that the firemen were out of the building before the call, since you agree that Nigro is not lying.
 
What time was the call Roger?

Why accept your challenge, when you have no evidence to back your theory at all?

A challenge.

If anyone can show me facts and evidence that the firemen were in the building at the time of the call i will leave the forum forever.

Otherwise you will have to admit the firemen were NOT in the buidling at the time of the call and that the fire commadner had to be talking about the buidling when he stated PULL IT.
 
A challenge.

If anyone can show me facts and evidence that the firemen were in the building at the time of the call i will leave the forum forever.

Otherwise you will have to admit the firemen were NOT in the buidling at the time of the call and that the fire commadner had to be talking about the buidling when he stated PULL IT.

A challenge: Demonstrate that you are sane.

Acknowledge that YOU DO NOT KNOW WHEN, OR IF, A CALL WAS PLACED TO LARRY SILVERSTEIN.

Acknowledge that demolition professionals DO NOT talk about "pulling" large buildings. It can't be done. Firefighters talk about "pulling" a contingent of men.

Acknowledge that IF someone called Larry Silverstein, and IF the call was made after the last man had been pulled from the collapse zone, IT DOESN'T MAKE A DAMN BIT OF DIFFERENCE!!!!!!
 
A challenge.

If anyone can show me facts and evidence that the firemen were in the building at the time of the call i will leave the forum forever.

Otherwise you will have to admit the firemen were NOT in the buidling at the time of the call and that the fire commadner had to be talking about the buidling when he stated PULL IT.


But you cannot prove a 40+ story burning building has ever been pulled before...ever.

So, once again you lose.

- end of story -
 
So you would have to agree then that that the firemen were out of the building before the call, since you agree that Nigro is not lying.


Remember the box experiment? What did you write in the box marked "time when the last man left the collapse zone"? Now, you know what you wrote in the box marked, "time when a fire chief supposedly called Larry Silverstein"?
YOU WROTE NOTHING! You wrote nothing because you DON'T KNOW when or if such a call was made. Maybe the men were all out during the call, assuming there was a call, and maybe they weren't.

WE JUST DON'T KNOW, and IT DOESN'T MATTER!!
 
I agree that you have no evidence to9 back up your ridiculous claim. You have no proof a 40+ story burning building has ever been "pulled".

Heck, you cant even prove you are who you say you are :big:
 
So again either you believe the fire chiefs or they are lying which is it?


I believe that Nigro and Hayden have absolutely nothing to hide. They said absolutely nothing that even hints at support for your idiotic nonsense. If I tell you that they are not lying another thousand times, how many times will you ask your brain-dead question?

Tell us what time the call to Silverstein was placed.

Oh, really? You say that YOU DON'T KNOW?!?!
 
You already lied to a fellow forum member (Unsecured Coins) when you said you would post your evidence of a 40+ story burning building being pulled before or after 9/11.....and then you didnt.

I think you are challenged, in more ways than one.
 
A challenge.

If anyone can show me facts and evidence that the firemen were in the building at the time of the call i will leave the forum forever.

Otherwise you will have to admit the firemen were NOT in the buidling at the time of the call and that the fire commadner had to be talking about the buidling when he stated PULL IT.
Wow, a challange that you already know we cannot meet. Real adult of you. Now for your challange.
Prove that the call was made after the firemen were out of the building. That would include atatements of the exact time and provide phone records to back it up. Ready, go.
 
Its not my fault you cannot figure out the information posted.

It's not my fault that you cant prove your theory.

It's not my fault you have no evidence of a 40+ story burning building ever being "pulled".

It would help if you did more research before posting these baseless claims.
 
A challenge.

If anyone can show me facts and evidence that the firemen were in the building at the time of the call i will leave the forum forever.

Otherwise you will have to admit the firemen were NOT in the buidling at the time of the call and that the fire commadner had to be talking about the buidling when he stated PULL IT.
Your Logic = Show evidence JFK was not shot by an evil space alien imbeded into Lee Harvey Oswalds brain. If you can't that means this argument is true.

See: Argument from ignorance

The argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam ("appeal to ignorance"), argument by lack of imagination, or negative evidence, is a logical fallacy in which it is claimed that a premise is true only because it has not been proven false, or is false only because it has not been proven true.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
 
Prove that the call was made after the firemen were out of the building. .

Well the call had to be made after the firemen were out due to the facts and for several basic, common sense reasons.

1. Chief Nigro stated he pulled the firemen out early in the day without talking to anyone.

2. Chief Hayden supports the fact of the firemen pulled out early in the day.

3. What fire commander is going to make a call while the firemen are in a unstable building.
 
Last edited:
It's not my fault that you cant prove your theory.

It's not my fault you have no evidence of a 40+ story burning building ever being "pulled".

It would help if you did more research before posting these baseless claims.


The quotes in your signature suggest that perhaps we are the real fools here.
 

Back
Top Bottom