DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

[beachnut]

Third one was not level, better paste and cut that again. What superior resolution you have! lol


It boils down to, DC thinks the WTC7 was a CD because he thinks it was. Simple.

mm agrees with the no fact DC, with less evidence, or more? funny stuff, 6 years, no clue

 

[MarkyX]

Spliced image. This is not valid evidence.

 

[GlennB]

...

The videos reveal a high speed collapse which maintains an amazingly level roofline ....

My bolding.

MM gets it wrong for the 83rd time in a row.

The E Penthouse dropped into the building several seconds before global collapse, as you well know by now.

How can you be so bad at this "truth" stuff without actually being a disinfo artist? C'mon .. you being paid to show up 9/11 "truth" in a bad light?

 

[Miragememories]

Spliced image. This is not valid evidence.

Do you see the roofline dipping towards the east side collapse?

Clearly the building is collapsing.

Clearly the west side roofline is quite level.

This is valid evidence.

MM

 

[beachnut]

not level, you messed this up

Oops, not even close to level, it even changes as the building fails. Oops, you made a mistake.

You should check your work first before you make big errors like this? How did you miss the fact the roof line was not level. Eye checkup? Measure it next time, get your eyes checked.

better copy and paste again, the third roof line is tilted, oops, truth is wrong again

 

[Miragememories]

My bolding.

MM gets it wrong for the 83rd time in a row.

The E Penthouse dropped into the building several seconds before global collapse, as you well know by now.

How can you be so bad at this "truth" stuff without actually being a disinfo artist? C'mon .. you being paid to show up 9/11 "truth" in a bad light?

Your point?

I don't dispute the east penthouse collapse.

I use the NIST diagram that shows the kink there.

Pay attention if it's not too much trouble Glenn.

The fact that the east penthouse collapsed first, does not negate the fact that the whole roofline of the main building descended level.

MM

 

[beachnut]

he needs to enlarge his photo to see the roof line is not LEVEL, NOT level... this is funny

 

[DC]

ok the wood thing is good lol

while the tests are strange, why did they in the first test load the steel with 100% and wood only with 69%? and in the second test it was the wood on 100% and the steel on 69% :/
and as i understand it, it was a flame breaktrue test and not a collapse test, and simulated the burnout conditions.
but they talk about future long time tests, you got links to that?

 

[DC]

who did photoshop that pic pls? and why?

 

[scissorhands]

ok the wood thing is good lol

while the tests are strange, why did they in the first test load the steel with 100% and wood only with 69%? and in the second test it was the wood on 100% and the steel on 69% :/

Its quotes like these that make me wonder whether you have any clue at all about engineering and the slightest idea at all of how to interpret test data.
Go and look again at the table you are referring to.

 

[DC]

http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire80/art009.html

page 27

% of max allowable stress.

test 1 wood 69%
test 2 steel 100%

why was this exactly? i have some problems with fully understand the complete paper.

 

[scissorhands]

why did they in the first test load the steel with 100% and wood only with 69%? and in the second test it was the wood on 100% and the steel on 69% :/

Why do you think they would do that DC?
Are they testing against anything that might be a constant, maybe?

 

[DC]

Why do you think they would do that DC?
Are they testing against anything that might be a constant, maybe?

you tell me.

 

[fkwebinash]

Who cares about the NIST report? No member of the truth movement considers the NIST report as valid because it was made by the gubmint.

 

[scissorhands]

Im doing my best to give you a clue about how scientific tests are carried out.
It doesnt seem to be working.
You arent really an engineer are you DC?

 

[DC]

Im doing my best to give you a clue about how scientific tests are carried out.
It doesnt seem to be working.
You arent really an engineer are you DC?

just tell me

for you it must be easy, the report is in your language.

 

[scissorhands]

just tell me

for you it must be easy, the report is in your language.

You are perfectly capable of understanding the language involved, its very minimal.
You are an engineer (allegedly), you should be able to understand basic concepts of test methods, but strangely you have become unable to understand the english language at a most opportune moment.

 

[DC]

You are perfectly capable of understanding the language involved, its very minimal.
You are an engineer (allegedly), you should be able to understand basic concepts of test methods, but strangely you have become unable to understand the english language at a most opportune moment.

well they not use laymann terms. and my technical english is even worser than my normal english.

just tell me why, what is your problem? you linked to the tests.

 

[stateofgrace]

A SIMPLE REQUEST.

Dictator Cheney:

You made a statement that WTC7 was a controlled Demolition. Please inform this forum as to how you arrived at your conclusion.

LAME AND BORING TWOOFER EXCUSES IN ORDER TO AVOID ANSWERING.

by thinking and reading

even chemists can be "experts" in tall building collapses aslong they folow the "official theory"

you think it was not a CD?

you all waiting for me to explain to you why i think the obvious controlled demolition of WTC7 was a CD?
are you all bored?

well maybe i will present evidence when i am done with reading the NIST report on WTC7.

your arrogance is unbelivable.

well before i would consider the CD of WTC 7 a fact, i would like to read the official theory to it first.

i have no evidence, it is what i think is the reason for collapse, i dont want to convince you that it was indeed a CD, im not sure enough myself.

ok back to topic.
here my hard evidence






















thanks

the motive for WTC7 CD? i dunno.

other buidling was alot more damaged that WTC7 till WTC7 was CDed then oc it was indeed damaged to its max.

düpflischiesser.

i cant say how much it would need to wire it. im not a CD expert

but i really dont know.
.

wouldnt that damage surounding buildings alot more than it did now?
i dont even know theyr motive to CD it. so i for sure dont know why they choosed that kind of CD.

you think they let it look like a CD?

for me it still looks like a CD, sorry

I got bored after three pages.

DC, you are a bore.

Your posts and lame excuses are boring.

Answer the OP, stop being boring or clear off.

 

[DC]

i answered the OP already several times
when your bored by my posts, dont read them.