• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

applecorped

Banned
applecorped
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
20,145
Dictator Cheney:

You made a statement that WTC7 was a controlled Demolition. Please inform this forum as to how you arrived at your conclusion.
 
All the speculation about 7 will end when NIST produces a report. What's the hold up?
 
DC, none of the firefighters that were on scene believe that the collapse of WTC7 was due to controlled demolition. They unanimously agree that debris damage and fire was the cause, and in fact this is the official position of the FDNY.

Why do you suppose this is?
 
theauthor said:
All the speculation about 7 will end when NIST produces a report. What's the hold up?
Click to expand...


Yes, because the NIST report on 1 and 2 ended the speculation about them... :rolleyes:

Face it, if the NIST report concludes that there was no CD, then the truth movement will complain it is wrong, just like they are still doing for the first report.
 
[X] said:
Yes, because the NIST report on 1 and 2 ended the speculation about them... :rolleyes:

Face it, if the NIST report concludes that there was no CD, then the truth movement will complain it is wrong, just like they are still doing for the first report.
Click to expand...
They already have said there is no evidence for explosives. Yet these guys still carry on. So why he said this is beyond me. I assume he hasn't read word one of the reports.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
by thinking and reading :)
Click to expand...

This indicates that your claim of WTC7 being a CD is not a fact, it's merely an opinion or belief you hold. Thanks for clearing that up.

To avoid future confusion, you may want to preface statements like "wtc7 was a cd" with "I believe that...".
 
No one died when wtc7 collapsed.
There is no believable motive for deliberate demolition of wtc7
There is no believable method for deliberate demolition of wtc7
The insurers appear to be satisfied that the collapse of wtc7 wasn't due to deliberate controlled demolition

What's the hurry?
 
johnny karate said:
DC, none of the firefighters that were on scene believe that the collapse of WTC7 was due to controlled demolition. They unanimously agree that debris damage and fire was the cause, and in fact this is the official position of the FDNY.

Why do you suppose this is?
Click to expand...

how they know when they got pulled ?
 
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
 
Tweeter said:
What are the qualifications to become a fireman? Most of the ones from my town are barely literate, firebugs and followers. I wouldnt trust their version of events if you paid me.
Click to expand...

That's actually a good point. Fireman are without doubt brave and committed but they are not in any sense experts on building collapse, especially in a situation that had never been encountered before.
 
even chemists can be "experts" in tall building collapses aslong they folow the "official theory"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom