• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread Virginia Guiffre v Duke of York

Vixen said:
'The Crown has instructed the Lord Chancellor of the warrant'.

Doesn't clarify if this is another instance of, 'Still has the titles, just not using them'.
Click to expand...
Not sure what you're quoting this time, that's not in the official statement, which you shared earlier.

1761911863997.png
 
Vixen said:
Doesn't have the legal power. Power resides with Parliament not the monarchy. Know your history.
Click to expand...
Seems like this would be exactly the sort of power that the monarchy (and monarch) still retains.
But I'm not an expert on British law.
 
Vixen said:
You pointed out that Edward's children were still prince and princess but 'just didn't use their titles'.

Fact is, there was an RF trimming, which is the reason why. Except Andrew. Who INSISTED his kids use the titles. Clear now?
Click to expand...
Nope - clear as mud. Edward's kids can use the title princess and prince i.e. are a princess and a prince. Andrews's kids can use the title princess, i.e. they are princesses. Anne's kids can't use the title prince or princess because Anne is not a son of a monarch. BUT you now must remember a particularly important thing here - it is all make believe - there are no actual binding rules, they can do whatever they want.

So again what on earth did you mean by "Face saving for Anne's and Edward's children, whilst Andrew's gets to use the titles."
 
Was reading some articles about this and I've noted quite a lot of emphasis was put on the claim from Virginia Guiffre that it seemed to her that he thought he was entitled to have sex with her. I'm unsure why this is seemingly damning to him, of course he expected it and thought it was his right, that was what his life had led him to believe and in fact how his life was. He was the (claimed) favourite son of his mother and father, goodness me when he was younger the tabloids created the appellation of "Randy Andy", he was apparently as much a "womaniser" as his father, or if he had been a woman - a slut.
 
When the mood takes them, they don't hang about.

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor should go to the US to answer questions on Jeffrey Epstein if asked to do so, a UK government minister has said, as it emerged that the former prince’s name has already been struck from the official roll of the peerage.

Hours after the dramatic statement that King Charles had formally stripped his brother of all titles, including Duke of York, his HRH style and honours, Buckingham Palace said Andrew’s name had been removed from the roll, a move that in effect ends his public life.
www.theguardian.com

Ex-prince Andrew should answer US questions on Epstein if asked, UK minister says

Chris Bryant says government welcomes king’s decision on his brother, who is now ‘ordinary member of the public’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
I just saw a headline on ABC News saying Buckingham Palace has announced Andrew will still remain 8th in line to the throne.

How contradictory to their statement earlier sympathising with his victims!
 
zooterkin said:
The King is now removing all of Andrew's titles, and he will have to move out of his house. Still no admission that Andrew has done anything wrong, of course.

www.theguardian.com

Prince Andrew to be stripped of titles and forced to leave Windsor home

King’s brother will become known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, Buckingham Palace says, in latest fallout from Epstein scandal
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
King Charles has initiated a “formal process to remove the style, titles and honours of Prince Andrew”, who will now be known as AndrewMountbatten Windsor, the palace said.
Click to expand...
Ouch! What a way to rub it in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom