Is he also involved in sex trafficking?Oh dear: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c70kjr9wjw0t?post=asset:18286569-d078-4c73-a20c-4336cfb423f9#post
Hopefully won’t be too long until his elder brother is also arrested.
Is he also involved in sex trafficking?Oh dear: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c70kjr9wjw0t?post=asset:18286569-d078-4c73-a20c-4336cfb423f9#post
Hopefully won’t be too long until his elder brother is also arrested.
From the information given so far this is about suspicion of misconduct in public office.Is he also involved in sex trafficking?
Perhaps he has sold information for girls?From the information given so far this is about suspicion of misconduct in public office.
Which is the other sibling?Andrew could end up being the second one of his siblings to have a criminal record. 4 kids, 2 with criminal records, I blame the parents.
His sister Anne.Which is the other sibling?
That's a very vague charge. I'll give it 48 hours for details to come out.From the information given so far this is about suspicion of misconduct in public office.
Which is the other sibling?
Consequently, at the time of the alleged misconduct the individual must be acting as, not simply whilst, a public official… No authority was shown to us suggesting that the offence can be or has been equated to bringing an office into disrepute or misusing a platform outside the scope of the office.
Timing seems very convenient for Keir Starmer; certainly pushed him off front pages. The case is going to go nowhere, the information he was given was to 'drum up' business for the UK. So long as he claims he used the information in the belief it might result in new business for Britain, he did nothing wrong. It will be very important exactly what terms and briefing he received about his role.
Misconduct in Public Office has four elements
- a public officer acting as such
- wilfully neglects to perform their duty and/or wilfully misconducts themselves
- to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder
- without reasonable excuse or justification
Misconduct in Public Office | The Crown Prosecution Service
www.cps.gov.uk
The way that they could convict is if they could show that AMW received sexual favours in return for disclosure of information.
Cash, to both him and Fergie would be easier to prove
Sarah Fergusson is irrelevant, she is an ex-wife. It can only be his conduct that is relevant to the crime. Cash would be very hard to trace. More formal financial relationships such as loans or gifts would need to be shown to be related to the misconduct, this might be hard to do. Epstein won't testify in an English court.Cash, to both him and Fergie would be easier to prove
It would be surprising to see him testifying in any court.Epstein won't testify in an English court.
Sarah Fergusson is irrelevant, she is an ex-wife. It can only be his conduct that is relevant to the crime. Cash would be very hard to trace. More formal financial relationships such as loans or gifts would need to be shown to be related to the misconduct, this might be hard to do. Epstein won't testify in an English court.
They keep calling this a witch hunt. Spectral evidence was admissible in the witch trials, so yeah.It would be surprising to see him testifying in any court.
They keep calling this a witch hunt. Spectral evidence was admissible in the witch trials, so yeah.
A witch trial? Come on, the man's not gonna float now.