• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

General Holocaust denial discussion Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saggy said:
Hey, it's not easy presenting evidence for the hoax. Perhaps you should give it a try :)

On the other hand, there are lot more photos on Yad Vashem worthy of consideration.
Click to expand...
I have presented a great deal of evidence for the Holocaust - you generally ignore it and whine - you're the one who won't provide evidence for the supposed hoax. Get busy.

Here you go, just as a reminder, tons of evidence for gassing at Treblinka in 1942 - with a discussion of two credible witnesses, Krzepicki and Rabinowicz - and as a bonus a dumb revisionist myth is rubbished in the process: http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.de/2016/05/the-revisionist-fabrication-of-myth-of_22.html. Remember? The witnesses and evidence you have been pretending I didn't post?
 
Last edited:
Saggy said:
The point is the women worked in and out of the camp. Totally inconsistent with the holohoax narrative where the gassings were a big secret.

So, Yad Vashem scratched that little bit of info.
Click to expand...

Olympic level demonstration of jumping to a conclusion.
 
Saggy said:
The point is the women worked in and out of the camp. Totally inconsistent with the holohoax narrative where the gassings were a big secret.

So, Yad Vashem scratched that little bit of info.
Click to expand...

Quote a history that uses that alleged narrative. You cannot, instead all you do is make up lies and refuse to answer questions.
 
LemmyCaution said:
I have presented a great deal of evidence for the Holocaust -
Click to expand...

I must have missed it. But, I'm going to help you out .....

COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR THE 'HOLOCAUST'

Courtesy of the Jewish Virtual Library ....

The unaware last walk to the gas chamber at Birkenau

gSmAD9w.jpg


Who would not be moved by such an image?
 
Saggy said:
I must have missed it. But, I'm going to help you out .....

COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR THE 'HOLOCAUST'

Courtesy of the Jewish Virtual Library ....

The unaware last walk to the gas chamber at Birkenau

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/gSmAD9w.jpg[/qimg]

Who would not be moved by such an image?
Click to expand...
So, without any evidence for your claims, what you are left with is anti-Semitic taunts ("100% kosher sources") and juvenile mockery of the victims of the Nazis?

noted: you continue to refuse to answer questions about resettlement and you again ignore evidence presented about credible witnesses
 
More

COMPELLING EVIDENCE OF THE 'HOLOCAUST'

Courtesy of the movie 'Shoah' and the USHMM..

The tearful testimony of A. Bomba, featured in the movie 'Shoah' and on the USHMM web site, who gave haircuts to naked women in the very gas chamber where they were to be immediately gassed. Bomba tears up telling of how the barbers had to give haircuts to their soon-to-be deceased wives and mothers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXweT1BgQMk

gJcxLFz.jpg


Oy gevalt, if you won't believe this, what will you believe?

Is this one step better, or one step worse, than Morris Venezia and his brother Schlomo, who gave haircuts to corpses, of naked women of course?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
What he is trying to prove and what he's proving are way different things.

I cannot believe he's back to Zisblatt. Jesus wept.
 
Saggy is afraid to discuss Krzepicki and Rabinowicz. Perhaps deep, down inside he realizes how big a problem are the twin issues of Treblnka and Warsaw in 1942 for his belief system. He'd rather pretend Jews were sent off to Unicornville than respond to the testimonies of two credible witnesses.
 
Last edited:
Ah, Saggy is trying the denier tried and true method (made famous by the flying Rizoli brothers) of barreling ahead without bothering to answer any questions.

Kudos, Saggy. I always enjoy the classics.
 
Huh, first I couldn't post, now I've got two duplicates. Hopefully this is the last one.
 
Last edited:
Argumemnon said:
I'm sorry, what are you trying to prove by posting stuff that contradicts your view?
Click to expand...

For one thing, I'm making explicit the fact that I am the only person on the board who is willing to post evidence that the 'holocaust' happened.

Then, after at some point, I will switch to the evidence of the hoax.

And, we can compare.

Capiche?

And, of course, I invite all the hoaxers to post evidence that the 'holocaust' happened. But, so far, ........ crickets ...... from the hoaxers.
 
Saggy said:
For one thing, I'm making explicit the fact that I am the only person on the board who is willing to post evidence that the 'holocaust' happened.

Then, after at some point, I will switch to the evidence of the hoax.

And, we can compare.

Capiche?

And, of course, I invite all the hoaxers to post evidence that the 'holocaust' happened. But, so far, ........ crickets ...... from the hoaxers.
Click to expand...

THE holocaust happened. Deep down I think most people who deny it know it happened, you've got nothing. Nothing but silly cherry picking and ignorance.
 
Saggy said:
. . . I invite all the hoaxers to post evidence that the 'holocaust' happened. But, so far, ........ crickets ...... from the hoaxers.
Click to expand...
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed to comply with Rule 12
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saggy said:
For one thing, I'm making explicit the fact that I am the only person on the board who is willing to post evidence that the 'holocaust' happened.

Then, after at some point, I will switch to the evidence of the hoax.

And, we can compare.

Capiche?

And, of course, I invite all the hoaxers to post evidence that the 'holocaust' happened. But, so far, ........ crickets ...... from the hoaxers.
Click to expand...

That's because you basically ignore anything we post. It is funny to watch you, though.

So, do you want me to put in a good word for you with Pyrro? No guarantees but I'm happy to make the attempt. Your accounts locked, not banned.

Also, do you know any deniers you can send in our direction? We'd love some new ones since the old ones couldn't hack it and bolted.
 
Jeffk 1970 said:
That's because you basically ignore anything we post. It is funny to watch you, though.
Click to expand...
More like weird.

The guy asks us what we think happened and why. We tell him. We give him explanations and supporting evidence.

Which spooks him. So he ignores what we post.

Then he pretends we haven't ever posted support or evidence for our conclusions.

Then he tells us that only evidence he "likes" counts - and spams various YouTube links, misrepresents some sources, and witters on.

Mind you: he wants to refute arguments we haven't made and evidence we haven't cited, and ignores what we have posted! LOL

Jeffk 1970 said:
So, do you want me to put in a good word for you with Pyrro? No guarantees but I'm happy to make the attempt. Your accounts locked, not banned.
Click to expand...
IIRC a locked account means a serious violation of basic rules . . . shocking, I know . . .
 
Last edited:
LemmyCaution said:
More like weird.



IIRC a locked account means a serious violation of basic rules . . . shocking, I know . . .
Click to expand...

Ah, well, I'm still willing to put in a good word. Up to Pyrro, though.

It would be nice to have some new deniers, we've basically turned into the gripe about Trump Forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom