I actually meant some group that was recognisably independant!There were numerous simulations and tests done by NIST in their investigation.
I actually meant some group that was recognisably independant!There were numerous simulations and tests done by NIST in their investigation.
Like THIS?I actually meant some group that was recognisably independant!
Why are 9/11 truth movement people unable to think and research?Well actually I don't do this as a full-time hobby, unlike some of the people on this thread, who spend more time than seems plausibly healthy attacking 'dissenters'! Any idea when the Purdue foundation will be getting around to doing these simulations for the Twin Towers as well, then?
I actually meant some group that was recognisably independant!
1,2. Nope! Don't remember doing that.This is why it seems like people are getting so short with you. You came in making accusations(1) and passing judgments(2), and then say "well let me ask you a serious question" and to provide a link.(3)
So if I went to a big city library looking for a particular book, you'd recommend me to browse the aisles, rather than go to the desk and ask a librarian? Makes sense! Need I go on?We have a search feature here, and if you were really interested in finding answers to your questions you could have utilized it before ever making a post.
1,2.
So if I went to a big city library looking for a particular book, you'd recommend me to browse the aisles, rather than go to the desk and ask a librarian? Makes sense! Need I go on?
Not quite Beachnut! Just a tad lazy, and prefer letting people more qualified do the work for me. Cheers.Why are 9/11 truth movement people unable to think and research?
Too, late. You are not even able to do simple research?
Spell it right or I'll start to doubt your literacy skills.Well if you had been to a library sometime in the last 10 years you would know that most libraries have computers from which you can search for books, and not have to bother the libriarian.
And what have you got against librarians, or is it libriarians?Also, fellow posters are not "librarians".
Not quite Beachnut! Just a tad lazy, and prefer letting people more qualified do the work for me. Cheers.
I wouldn't recommend going up to a librarian and saying "you librarians think you know everything about books but that's because you're close-minded. Now, what aisle is 'The Joy of Crack' on?"So if I went to a big city library looking for a particular book, you'd recommend me to browse the aisles, rather than go to the desk and ask a librarian? Makes sense! Need I go on?
So you aren't a troll, but you're proud of being called one.Well, I must say I'm quite proud of myself. 24 posts and I am being labeled as a "troll".

Well it took me 50+ posts to get a similar response from the kind folks at Straightdope.com, so either you are shrewder than that lot over there, or you are even quicker to make assumptions. I tend to favour the latter!So you aren't a troll, but you're proud of being called one.![]()
Of course you do. After all, you come from a world where it's not true if you don't want to believe it.Well it took me 50+ posts to get a similar response from the kind folks at Straightdope.com, so either you are shrewder than that lot over there, or you are even quicker to make assumptions. I tend to favour the latter!
The Straight Dope has specific rules against troll-calling, so both choices are entirely invalid.Well it took me 50+ posts to get a similar response from the kind folks at Straightdope.com, so either you are shrewder than that lot over there, or you are even quicker to make assumptions. I tend to favour the latter!
I suggest that we stop spoon feeding anyone who says "point me to the link" or "point me to the proof"
just direct them to the SEarch button on the forum.