ZEITGEIST, The Movie

poor research is the sign of most truther

Well actually I don't do this as a full-time hobby, unlike some of the people on this thread, who spend more time than seems plausibly healthy attacking 'dissenters'! Any idea when the Purdue foundation will be getting around to doing these simulations for the Twin Towers as well, then?
Why are 9/11 truth movement people unable to think and research?

Too, late. You are not even able to do simple research?
 
This is why it seems like people are getting so short with you. You came in making accusations(1) and passing judgments(2), and then say "well let me ask you a serious question" and to provide a link.(3)
1,2. Nope! Don't remember doing that.
3 So? In every other thread I've read , you're throwing them about like confetti!
We have a search feature here, and if you were really interested in finding answers to your questions you could have utilized it before ever making a post.
So if I went to a big city library looking for a particular book, you'd recommend me to browse the aisles, rather than go to the desk and ask a librarian? Makes sense! Need I go on?
 
1,2.

So if I went to a big city library looking for a particular book, you'd recommend me to browse the aisles, rather than go to the desk and ask a librarian? Makes sense! Need I go on?

Well if you had been to a library sometime in the last 10 years you would know that most libraries have computers from which you can search for books, and not have to bother the libriarian.

Also, fellow posters are not "librarians".
 
Last edited:
Why are 9/11 truth movement people unable to think and research?

Too, late. You are not even able to do simple research?
Not quite Beachnut! Just a tad lazy, and prefer letting people more qualified do the work for me. Cheers.
 
Well if you had been to a library sometime in the last 10 years you would know that most libraries have computers from which you can search for books, and not have to bother the libriarian.
Spell it right or I'll start to doubt your literacy skills.
Also, fellow posters are not "librarians".
And what have you got against librarians, or is it libriarians?
 
So if I went to a big city library looking for a particular book, you'd recommend me to browse the aisles, rather than go to the desk and ask a librarian? Makes sense! Need I go on?
I wouldn't recommend going up to a librarian and saying "you librarians think you know everything about books but that's because you're close-minded. Now, what aisle is 'The Joy of Crack' on?"
 
I suggest that we stop spoon feeding anyone who says "point me to the link" or "point me to the proof"

just direct them to the SEarch button on the forum.
 
Well, I must say I'm quite proud of myself. 24 posts and I am being labeled as a "troll". All I can say is think what you want ( Just as long as it does not contradict the "official theory" that is!:cool: ) , but calling me names isn't going to make me go away.
 
You have yet to make a point on anything really, so why 24 posts in, have you been simply berating other people here, making no arguments.

Are you just here for coffee and some chat?

If so, there is a general area known as the "Forum Community".

But all that said, who said I was posting that pic in reference to you;)
 
So you aren't a troll, but you're proud of being called one.:boggled:
Well it took me 50+ posts to get a similar response from the kind folks at Straightdope.com, so either you are shrewder than that lot over there, or you are even quicker to make assumptions. I tend to favour the latter!
 
...and yet with every post you keep proving you are one. Hmmmmmm.
 
Well it took me 50+ posts to get a similar response from the kind folks at Straightdope.com, so either you are shrewder than that lot over there, or you are even quicker to make assumptions. I tend to favour the latter!
Of course you do. After all, you come from a world where it's not true if you don't want to believe it. :p
 
Well it took me 50+ posts to get a similar response from the kind folks at Straightdope.com, so either you are shrewder than that lot over there, or you are even quicker to make assumptions. I tend to favour the latter!
The Straight Dope has specific rules against troll-calling, so both choices are entirely invalid.

Who were you over there? Just curious.
 
I suggest that we stop spoon feeding anyone who says "point me to the link" or "point me to the proof"

just direct them to the SEarch button on the forum.

And why would you be averse to just making the information readily available, as opposed to sending me on a JREF wild goosechase? As I've mentioned, you don't seem to have been shy with your links in the past. And you lot do seem to have far more time on your hands than I have!
 

Back
Top Bottom