Split Thread WTC2 was struck by a 'flying pig'

[dafydd]

Actually, what he meant to say was "Top-hole. Bally Jerry, pranged his kite right in the how's-your-father;hairy blighter, dicky-birded, feathered back on his sammy, took a waspy, flipped over on his Betty Harpers and caught his can in the Bertie."

Perfectly clear now, eh what?

Spiffing,old bean.

 

[dafydd]

Sorry, I'm not really up on 9/11 conspiracy theories. Is there some explanation as to why the NWO/George Bush/Darth Vader/whoever wouldn't just use aeroplanes instead of using missiles and then faking the scene?

Using missiles and then faking the scene would seem like a good idea in the bizzaro world of Trutherland.They do things differently there.

 

[Howie Felterbush]

If I've learned one thing on the Bigfoot threads, it's that Bigfoot has been known to throw pigs. Perhaps this conspiracy goes deeper than we think...

 

[Sledge]

I just can't get my head around the... I was going to use the word "logic," but that really wouldn't be right. Even "thought process" seems like giving too much credit, but we'll go with that. Ok, I can't get my head around the thought process that would say "we want the world to think that aeroplanes were crashed into several buildings, but even though we're the most powerful organisation in the world and could easily use aeroplanes, we'll use missiles! Then we'll fake the wreckage to look like aeroplanes and remove all trace of the missiles." Without even getting into the details of how one would do that, WHY would one do that?

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

Ok, I can't get my head around the thought process that would say "we want the world to think that aeroplanes were crashed into several buildings, but even though we're the most powerful organisation in the world and could easily use aeroplanes, we'll use missiles! Then we'll fake the wreckage to look like aeroplanes and remove all trace of the missiles."

It would have been easier to design airplanes that look like missles...

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

You know..just give it a few years, there will be some Truthers who will question if the World Trade Center ever existed....

 

[Pantaz]

... Without even getting into the details of how one would do that, WHY would one do that?

Well, if you're going to try ascribing logical thinking with 9/11 CT, you'll just take all the fun out of it! (Plus, it will just make your brain hurt.)

 

[Horatius]

Sorry, I'm not really up on 9/11 conspiracy theories. Is there some explanation as to why the NWO/George Bush/Darth Vader/whoever wouldn't just use aeroplanes instead of using missiles and then faking the scene?

It's simple really. They're Just That Evil.

I just can't get my head around the... I was going to use the word "logic," but that really wouldn't be right. Even "thought process" seems like giving too much credit, but we'll go with that. Ok, I can't get my head around the thought process that would say "we want the world to think that aeroplanes were crashed into several buildings, but even though we're the most powerful organisation in the world and could easily use aeroplanes, we'll use missiles! Then we'll fake the wreckage to look like aeroplanes and remove all trace of the missiles." Without even getting into the details of how one would do that, WHY would one do that?

See, you're looking at it from the point of view of having a simple plan with minimum chance of failure and/or exposure; you're not looking at it from the perspective of trying to maximize the Evil in the Plan.

Why not use real planes? Because that way, you also have to dispose of all the passengers and crew on the real plane you swapped out for the missile. Picture it: dozens of folks, herded out of their plane at some remote location, confused, scared, apprehensive, and then, they see the men with the guns. It's just More Evil That Way. Then, you have to dispose of their bodies in a manner they can never be found. It will require an entire unit of sociopaths to do such a job. Evilness Abounds.

Then, you have to coerce people into shooting the missile into the building . You don't think that sort of persuasion comes naturally to Nice People, do you? No, it requires more Evil. You frame them, you threaten their families, or you just brainwash them. Just so long as It's Evil.

And then the clean up of the missile. Again, more crews, more cover-ups, more lies, More Evil. Hey, you see that nice old guy over there? Smash the **** out of his cab and threaten to kill him if he tells anyone. That's Evil!

And then, of course, you leave obvious but unconvincing evidence lying about. Some stupid do-gooder will always notice, but will never be believed. His desperate attempts to convince people of the truth will drive a wedge into all his relationships. Friends, families, co-workers, that guy at the bar - they'll all think he's nuts. The constant barrage of abuse will eventually make him nuts, adding an Ironic Twist of Evil to the mixture.

It makes perfect sense just so long as you understand what they were really trying to do.









Oh, and then murder 80% of the world. Evil!

 

[Sledge]

Ah, I see. The NWO is run by Dick Dastardly. Now it all makes sense.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Sorry, I'm not really up on 9/11 conspiracy theories. Is there some explanation as to why the NWO/George Bush/Darth Vader/whoever wouldn't just use aeroplanes instead of using missiles and then faking the scene?

It would make for poor political conspiracy drama. At least that's what We™ were told by the C-list Hollywood screenwriters We™ hired to draw up the plan.

 

[eromitlab]

This reminds me of something I saw posted to reddit yesterday, except it was a pink elephant instead of a flying pig. That was said, however, in the sense that since the "official story" hasn't been independently verified, no one knows what really happened, anything and everything can be true and that's why we need a New Independent Investigation™. Which is an argument that makes about as much sense as this flying pig/missile mocked up as a miniature of a jumbo jet one.

 

[Fonebone]

sorry, but no missile in the world can be made to look like a 757. try again.

I stated clearly the cruise missile was secreted underneath the Boeing 767
miniature cloak.
Fonebone >

The screaming jet engine powered flying object that penetrated the WTC 2
south wall was a 21 st. century " flying pig " cleverly concealed inside of
the gut of a hollowed out miniature scale model of a Boeing 767 jumbo jet
utilized to cloak the missile.

Below is a profile of the WTC 2 murder weapon without any cloaking
No possibility of this flying pig being hidden in the underbelly of a phony
jumbo jet eh ? Pay special attention to the linear strip of horizontal light
reflection created by the sharp transition between the missile side and bottom walls where the four warning stickers are placed.
This cruise missile is the BIG brother of the baby missile seen here
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/s...-3588H-002.jpg



Now study the underside of the WTC 2 " jumbo jet profile.

See any horizontal linear line of light reflection on the underside of this "plane " as it banks left ?
http://blog.ericharmatz.com/wp-conte...09/04/911s.jpg


Truth,like the sun, allows itself to be obscured;
but ,like the sun, only for a time __Bove

 

[BigAl]

I stated clearly the cruise missile was secreted underneath the Boeing 767
miniature cloak.
Fonebone >


Below is a profile of the WTC 2 murder weapon without any cloaking
No possibility of this flying pig being hidden in the underbelly of a phony
jumbo jet eh ? Pay special attention to the linear strip of horizontal light
reflection created by the sharp transition between the missile side and bottom walls where the four warning stickers are placed.
This cruise missile is the BIG brother of the baby missile seen here
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/s...-3588H-002.jpg

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_363814b4cfbded00f5.jpg[/qimg]

Now study the underside of the WTC 2 " jumbo jet profile.

See any horizontal linear line of light reflection on the underside of this "plane " as it banks left ?
http://blog.ericharmatz.com/wp-conte...09/04/911s.jpg


Truth,like the sun, allows itself to be obscured;
but ,like the sun, only for a time __Bove

What a loon.

 

[Fonebone]

sorry, but no missile in the world can be made to look like a 757. try again.

Sorry, Fonebone, not wickety wack enough.

Newest Conspiracist Hypothesis Claims Cleverly Concealed Cruise "Turducken" Missile
Stuffed Inside Shrewdly Concealed "Flying Pig" Drone Cunningly Concealed Inside Miniature Jumbo Jet Struck WTC2.
​

Just when I thought it couldn't get any sillier....

Here is an image of a 767 with a couple a guys standing next to it...for scale.

[qimg]http://www.freefoto.com/images/2051/16/2051_16_5---Boeing-767_web.jpg[/qimg]

Here is an image of the missle you are referring to..also with a couple of guys standing next to it, for scaling purposes.

[qimg]http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/calcm-990330-F-3588H-002.jpg[/qimg]

and lastly....an image of your "flying pig" right before impact.

[qimg]http://blog.ericharmatz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/911s.jpg[/qimg]

Since we know the width of the WTC (208 feet)...and we know the wingspan of the aircraft (150 feet) it's easy to extrapolate the size of the object in the image...and sure enough...it's the size of a 767. So your "model" was full sized.

Now I'm wondering...how does a single engine with 600 pounds of thrust push a model that size at 500+ mph? (A single 767 engine has 50k-63K pounds of thrust.)

Wouldn't be a lot easier to just to put explosives in a real 767? It could hold a whole lot more than the 2500 pound warhead of the missile.

Pure silliness.

Sorry , I'm trying to get up to speed internetwise- for some reason the links are corrupted so I'm trying this back door approach. Please bear with me.
Thanks

I stated clearly the cruise missile was secreted underneath the Boeing 767
miniature cloak.
Fonebone >

Quote:
The screaming jet engine powered flying object that penetrated the WTC 2
south wall was a 21 st. century " flying pig " cleverly concealed inside of
the gut of a hollowed out miniature scale model of a Boeing 767 jumbo jet
utilized to cloak the missile.
Below is a profile of the WTC 2 murder weapon without any cloaking
No possibility of this flying pig being hidden in the underbelly of a phony
jumbo jet eh ? Pay special attention to the linear strip of horizontal light
reflection created by the sharp transition between the missile side and bottom walls where the four warning stickers are placed.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=18677
This cruise missile is the BIG brother of the baby missile seen here
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/s...-3588H-002.jpg
(second graphic this post )



Now study the underside of the WTC 2 " jumbo jet profile.

See any horizontal linear line of light reflection on the underside of this "plane " as it banks left ?
http://blog.ericharmatz.com/wp-conte...09/04/911s.jpg
(third graphic this post)


Truth,like the sun, allows itself to be obscured;
but ,like the sun, only for a time __Bove

 

[MIKILLINI]

I just can't get my head around the... I was going to use the word "logic," but that really wouldn't be right. Even "thought process" seems like giving too much credit, but we'll go with that. Ok, I can't get my head around the thought process that would say "we want the world to think that aeroplanes were crashed into several buildings, but even though we're the most powerful organisation in the world and could easily use aeroplanes, we'll use missiles! Then we'll fake the wreckage to look like aeroplanes and remove all trace of the missiles." Without even getting into the details of how one would do that, WHY would one do that?

Don't forget, they also claim demolition of the towers. Such an elaborate plan these conspiracists weave. The definition of logic doesn't register with them.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Sorry , I'm trying to get up to speed internetwise- for some reason the links are corrupted so I'm trying this back door approach. Please bear with me.
Thanks

I stated clearly the cruise missile was secreted underneath the Boeing 767
miniature cloak.
Fonebone >

Quote:
The screaming jet engine powered flying object that penetrated the WTC 2
south wall was a 21 st. century " flying pig " cleverly concealed inside of
the gut of a hollowed out miniature scale model of a Boeing 767 jumbo jet
utilized to cloak the missile.
Below is a profile of the WTC 2 murder weapon without any cloaking
No possibility of this flying pig being hidden in the underbelly of a phony
jumbo jet eh ? Pay special attention to the linear strip of horizontal light
reflection created by the sharp transition between the missile side and bottom walls where the four warning stickers are placed.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=18677
This cruise missile is the BIG brother of the baby missile seen here
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/s...-3588H-002.jpg
(second graphic this post )



Now study the underside of the WTC 2 " jumbo jet profile.

See any horizontal linear line of light reflection on the underside of this "plane " as it banks left ?
http://blog.ericharmatz.com/wp-conte...09/04/911s.jpg
(third graphic this post)


Truth,like the sun, allows itself to be obscured;
but ,like the sun, only for a time __Bove

So nobody working for AA, while doing their pre-flight checks, noticed anything out of the ordinary??
A phony jet? Them wasn't phony passengers who boarded a phony jet. What happened to those passengers Fonebone? They ended up in the Pentagon, so how did they get there?

 

[Horatius]

The screaming jet engine powered flying object that penetrated the WTC 2 south wall was a 21 st. century " flying pig " cleverly concealed inside of the gut of a hollowed out miniature scale model of a Boeing 767 jumbo jet utilized to cloak the missile.

Ah. I see. I misunderstood.


It wasn't hit by a "flying pig".


It was hit by a "flying pig wearing a hat".


Now it makes perfect sense!

 

[MIKILLINI]

Ah. I see. I misunderstood.


It wasn't hit by a "flying pig".


It was hit by a "flying pig wearing a hat".


Now it makes perfect sense!

Perfect truther idiocy. Gee, how could we have missed that?

 

[Justin39640]

Ah. I see. I misunderstood.


It wasn't hit by a "flying pig".


It was hit by a "flying pig wearing a hat".


Now it makes perfect sense!

A magic hat!
Miniature in size and made a full size hole.

 

[WildCat]

How does this prove that 9/11 was an inside job?

Connect the dots man...