• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Split Thread WTC2 was struck by a 'flying pig'

Fonebone said:
I stated clearly the cruise missile was secreted underneath the Boeing 767
miniature cloak.
Fonebone >


Below is a profile of the WTC 2 murder weapon without any cloaking
No possibility of this flying pig being hidden in the underbelly of a phony
jumbo jet eh ? Pay special attention to the linear strip of horizontal light
reflection created by the sharp transition between the missile side and bottom walls where the four warning stickers are placed.
This cruise missile is the BIG brother of the baby missile seen here
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/s...-3588H-002.jpg

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_363814b4cfbded00f5.jpg[/qimg]

Now study the underside of the WTC 2 " jumbo jet profile.

See any horizontal linear line of light reflection on the underside of this "plane " as it banks left ?
http://blog.ericharmatz.com/wp-conte...09/04/911s.jpg


Truth,like the sun, allows itself to be obscured;
but ,like the sun, only for a time __Bove
Click to expand...
Kthanx.

Now..... why???
 
This is even more dumb than the the pod theory. I hope this one sticks around a little longer than the pod theory because it is even more amusing. Keep up the good work fonbone!
 
Fonebone said:
I stated clearly the cruise missile was secreted underneath the Boeing 767
miniature cloak.
Click to expand...

The only thing I don't understand is why they used a cruise missile but didn't detonate it. I mean, if there was an explosion that large, wouldn't we have seen it?

Sure, we saw a slowly billowing ball of fire from the jet fuel, but the warhead from a cruise missile would create a REAL explosion. The shock wave would have blown out windows a mile away.
 
aggle-rithm said:
The only thing I don't understand is why they used a cruise missile but didn't detonate it. I mean, if there was an explosion that large, wouldn't we have seen it?

Sure, we saw a slowly billowing ball of fire from the jet fuel, but the warhead from a cruise missile would create a REAL explosion. The shock wave would have blown out windows a mile away.
Click to expand...



Well, they didn't want to give away the whole plot, you know!
 
I'd really like someone (I'm lookin at you, fonebone) to explain why this plan would make more sense than just, you know, actually using a 767.
 
While we're waiting on Fonebone to return and elaborate on his missile theory...can someone help me with some math?

3200 pound missile traveling at 500mph...hits the building with X amount of kinetic energy...then the 1500 lb warhead goes off. How would you calculate the amount of energy released in the explosive?...and can you just add the two together to get the total amount of energy the missile and warhead delivered to the towers?

Hey..who says you can learn something in a silly thread!
 
Last edited:
Horatius said:
Look, we're discussing flying pigs, not flying cows. Please try to stay on topic!
Click to expand...

OK - as long as nobody is porking flying cows, it should be ok. And speaking of that, isn't one of the founders of this feast missing?:confused::confused::D
 
Macgyver1968 said:
3200 pound missile traveling at 500mph...hits the building with X amount of kinetic energy...then the 1500 lb warhead goes off. How would you calculate the amount of energy released in the explosive?...and can you just add the two together to get the total amount of energy the missile and warhead delivered to the towers?
Click to expand...
I know! I know!

Despite several of my job titles, I am not anything like an engineer. However, near as I can guess, the Kinetic Energy is Quite a Bit, while the energy from the warhead is Something Else But Not Enough to Drop a Building, as was shown by the lag between the strikes and the collapses. All told, the sum of the two was MERELY ENOUGH to make a mess, START SOME FIRES, and kill a bunch of innocent people. The rest of the damage, including heat that softened steel and allowed a really heavy group of floors to collapse straight down, 'cuz that's where things go on a planet with gravity, was because the fires started earlier continued to grow, as can be seen on any number of videos.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what happened. Much of it is simple common sense, but as Twain said, "there's nothing less common than common sense."


Note: In Dale Carnegie class the teacher claimed that it was insipid public speaking to start off with a Mark Twain quote. I countered with an extemporaneous speech that used several Twain quotes. "Extemporaneous" in that I fit them into an off-the-cuff speech with no preparation. I won a pen.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom