• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread WTC2 was struck by a 'flying pig'

Macgyver1968 said:
Just when I thought it couldn't get any sillier....

Here is an image of a 767 with a couple a guys standing next to it...for scale.

http://www.freefoto.com/images/2051/16/2051_16_5---Boeing-767_web.jpg

Here is an image of the missle you are referring to..also with a couple of guys standing next to it, for scaling purposes.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/calcm-990330-F-3588H-002.jpg

and lastly....an image of your "flying pig" right before impact.

http://blog.ericharmatz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/911s.jpg

Since we know the width of the WTC....is easy to extrapolate the size of the object in the image...and sure enough...it's the size of a 767. So your "model" was full sized.

Now I'm wondering...how does a single engine with 600 pounds of thrust push a model that size at 500+ mph? (A single 767 engine has 50k-63K pounds of thrust.)

Wouldn't be a lot easier to just to put explosives in a real 767? It could hold a whole lot more than the 2500 pound warhead of the missile.

Pure silliness.
Click to expand...
The JSF (F-35) generates 25000 lb thrust without the A/B.
Running on the ground, it will make even Tim Allen yell for "less power"!
With earplugs and muffs, you cannot stand to be within 1000 feet of it, and you can hear it for a long way...
 
Okay, serious question time: Does anyone know what this "flying pig" thing is he's talking about? As you might expect, googling that term is less than useful.
 
Horatius said:
Okay, serious question time: Does anyone know what this "flying pig" thing is he's talking about? As you might expect, googling that term is less than useful.
Click to expand...
flyingpig3451479.jpg


Very dangerous to those below its flight path.
 
Horatius said:
Okay, serious question time: Does anyone know what this "flying pig" thing is he's talking about? As you might expect, googling that term is less than useful.
Click to expand...

Here's what I think he's talking about:

Truther: A cruise missile hit the tower...not a 767!

Debunker: Dude...all of the video show what looks very much like a 767.

Truther: Well....they made the missile look like a 767...just smaller.

Mac: Then why is the object in all of the videos the scale of 767?

Truther: ......................
 
Fonebone said:
Fonebone < Dastardly ? Diabolical ?
A CALCM Cruise missile is powered by a turbo-fan jet engine.
A Jumbo jet is propelled by a turbo fan jet engine.

How different are the sounds between a turbo-fan jet engine CALCM
cruise missile and a turbo-fan jet engine of a jumbo-jet Travis ?

True , the powerplant of a jumbo jet is about four times larger than a CALCM missile turbo fan but the CALCM engine is only fractionally smaller than a jet fighter's power plant.
Tell me Travis , How loud is a fighter jet engine ?
Does the fighter jet engine high pitched scream like a jumbo jet turbo fan ?
Does the fighter jet engine create a deafening roar of great magnitude like
a jumbo jet turbo fan engine ?

In fact Travis , A CALCM cruise missile is a high speed airplane similar to a Japanese Kamikaze or the jet powered German Selbstopfer V1 -- or the American FLYING PIG .Some flying pigs were manned and others were remote controlled but all had only one important passenger -- The PAYLOAD of
munitions.
Click to expand...

Hmm let's see,the Williams F107 low bypass ratio turbofan is 1.262m long with a diameter of 304mm (output 3.1kN)and a GE CF6high bypas ratio turbofan is 4.65m long and 2.67m in diameter (output 240kN) times 2 for a 767.

Yep people wouldn't be able to tell the difference there :boggled:
 
So not only must this "flying pig" fly at over 500 mph into the towers. but it also must have enough thrust to propel a 767 cloak / fuselage / drone along with it, Anyone see a problem with that?
 
Sam.I.Am said:
OK, serious answer. I think he's talking about one of these.
Click to expand...

I would have guessed one of these.

Seriously, this individual is (a) pulling your legs, (b) experiencing a severe flashback, or (c) insane. There is no way this will lead to a productive discussion. Stop teasing him.
 
Macgyver1968 said:
Just when I thought it couldn't get any sillier....

Here is an image of a 767 with a couple a guys standing next to it...for scale.

2051_16_5---Boeing-767_web.jpg


Here is an image of the missle you are referring to..also with a couple of guys standing next to it, for scaling purposes.

calcm-990330-F-3588H-002.jpg


and lastly....an image of your "flying pig" right before impact.

911s.jpg


Since we know the width of the WTC (208 feet)...and we know the wingspan of the aircraft (150 feet) it's easy to extrapolate the size of the object in the image...and sure enough...it's the size of a 767. So your "model" was full sized.

Now I'm wondering...how does a single engine with 600 pounds of thrust push a model that size at 500+ mph? (A single 767 engine has 50k-63K pounds of thrust.)

Wouldn't be a lot easier to just to put explosives in a real 767? It could hold a whole lot more than the 2500 pound warhead of the missile.

Pure silliness.
Click to expand...
This post makes complete sense and even a 5 year old could understand it. The logic is irrefutable.

Therefore, Fonebone will ignore it.
 
Sam.I.Am said:
OK, serious answer. I think he's talking about one of these.
Click to expand...



Okay, I figured out the cruise missile part, it was the term "flying pig" I was wondering about. He made it sound like it was the nickname of some actual type of aircraft or missile, like the F-14 Tomcat.
 
@fonebone. You don't need to post your username in every post, the forum has a magic NWO tracking feature which Automatically does it for you.
 
Yeah to all debunks, plus: There is a helluwa difference between the explosion of a HE warhead and the fuel fireball of a crashing plane, both visually and audibly. And what we observed on that day had all the characteristics of a fuel fireball.

Of course, if your only experience of explosions is from Hollywood footage, you wouldn't know since those are all fuel fireballs. .. You see, large HE explosions tend to tear people apart, blast windows and eardrums for miles, send supersonic scrapnel flying about, and a number of other antisocial things that could quite ruin your day on a movie set. .... And any of which were also NOT observed on Sept. 11th 2001.

Hans
 
I expect we'll see some flying pig comics soon.
 
Travis said:
I expect we'll see some flying pig comics soon.
Click to expand...



That's what I was thinking, but not knowing what he thinks a "Flying Pig" is, really limits the potential.


Maybe I'll just have Molech issue a vague order.....
 
Horatius said:
That's what I was thinking, but not knowing what he thinks a "Flying Pig" is, really limits the potential.


Maybe I'll just have Molech issue a vague order.....
Click to expand...


March's Thesaurus & Dictionary - 1933
Flying pig n. Aerial torpedo

This is a German "state of the Art " flying pig circa 1945 at the
end of WWII that was powered by a jet engine.
The flying pigs could be either remotely steered or steered by a man
making the ultimate sacrifice.
I do have a rendering of an American " remote controlled " flying pig but
the file is to large to load.

Fieseler Fi 103R
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom