• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
My bold.
WTC Dust said:
Implosions look different from explosions. You're not saying there was an implosion at the WTC, are you? Implosions go down and in. Explosions go up and out. There was very little debris in the "footprint" of the Twin Towers. Most of the dust spread out all over lower Manhattan, and the steel that was left was located outside the footprint.

The high school physicist in you must wonder what that horizontal force was.
Click to expand...

Make up your mind, explosions or dustification. Both fail.
The top sections crushed the light floors below, not the columns at a rate of about 7 floors per second. The noncrushed nonexploded nondustified unbraced outer columns toppled.

[qimg]http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/columns.jpg[/qimg]
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
The high school physicist in you must wonder what that horizontal force was.
Click to expand...

Triangle.gif

Drop a ball onto this ramp. Which way is it going to bounce?
 
WTC Dust said:
Implosions look different from explosions. You're not saying there was an implosion at the WTC, are you? Implosions go down and in. Explosions go up and out. There was very little debris in the "footprint" of the Twin Towers. Most of the dust spread out all over lower Manhattan, and the steel that was left was located outside the footprint.

The high school physicist in you must wonder what that horizontal force was.
Click to expand...

Here are three possibilities for exactly these horizontal forces.
 
Alferd_Packer said:
And just how does that happen? How does air get forced into a contiguous solid to form a foam?
Click to expand...

Mechanistically, Dr. Wood has the best idea, even though she doesn't really talk about foam per se or multiple types of dust.

She says the damage has the hallmarks of an energy weapon.
 
Alferd_Packer said:
You missed (or ignored) my question.


What would you consider a typical length of time for an underground fire to burn?
Click to expand...

I don't know. Have there ever been underground fires in NYC before? Or have there been underground fires in an equivalent metropolitan area?
 
BasqueArch said:
My bold.


Make up your mind, explosions or dustification. Both fail.
The top sections crushed the light floors below, not the columns at a rate of about 7 floors per second. The noncrushed nonexploded nondustified unbraced outer columns toppled.

[qimg]http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/columns.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

You don't see all that dust in those pics? I see it.

Why are you requesting that I make a choice? The buildings were exploded into dust.
 
WTC Dust said:
I don't know. Have there ever been underground fires in NYC before? Or have there been underground fires in an equivalent metropolitan area?
Click to expand...

So, you're basing your "It burned too long" on personal ignorance.

Wonderful.

Ever try fighting a fire with a ton of **** in the way?

Here is a simple experiment.

Take a candle. Put it behind a fan.

Turn fan on.

Piss through fan.

Observe results.
 
WTC Dust said:
Mechanistically, Dr. Wood has the best idea, even though she doesn't really talk about foam per se or multiple types of dust.

She says the damage has the hallmarks of an energy weapon.
Click to expand...
And that would be a weapon she can't even begin to describe. But it has all the "hallmarks" of it.


:rolleyes:
 
To paraphrase Arnold Rimmer 'Words haven't been invented to describe what it is. But it is one, and a total one at that!'
 
WTC Dust said:
You don't see all that dust in those pics? I see it.

Why are you requesting that I make a choice? The buildings were exploded into dust.
Click to expand...

Oh, so they weren't just turned into dust, now they were exploded into dust. One hell of a machine you have there.
 
I love how Dusty is claiming that it was not the US government that dustified the WTC but rather some unknown terrorists. As if some terrorists could possibly get their hands on such a device. A device, which if possible, would surely be the most powerful and valuable device ever invented.

And they apparently decided to only use it once. I dunno, if I were a terrorist that hates the USA and possessed a device which could turn skyscrapers to dust at will, I would hardly stop at just the WTC. I would continue dustifiying skyscrapers causing as much death, destruction, and chaos as possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom