• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
Anneliese,

How many of these bits of evidence are verifiable?

Stories are stories. Audios are audios. You want to take issue
with the authenticity of the dust that I found, so I hope you
cast as critical eye on the authenticity of the items you mentioned.

I've examined those bits of evidence. They amount to a story.

There's nothing to verify. You just sorta have to believe the
tapes are authentic. Where are the video tapes of the
hijackers for flight 77? That's the only bit I haven't seen
already, and I'd like to see it.

Tracy
Click to expand...
Like I said, much of the evidence I mentioned is out there for everyone to see.
The rest is evidence from those involved, so are you saying they're lying Tracy?

All the evidence adds up to conclude there were hijackings. Although I was an eyewitness, that alone means little. It's everything else that completes the big picture.

I touched upon particular witnesses for a reason, the controllers at Newark Tower. You said before that you believe witnesses were "mistaken" and somehow fooled by a hologram. Do you seriously think Air Traffic Controllers would be fooled? Not to mention that before they sighted flight 175 with their own eyes, the aircraft appeared on their primary radar. Please explain how a hologram projection would appear on primary radar.

ETA: I'm not completely sure where the Dulles image is, but it's around. I remember it because some truthers point out a mistake some sources made in identifying hani hanjour in a different picture which isn't the right one. I'll look for it but perhaps another member can find it quicker.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Warped edges.
Click to expand...
Is it just me or should I expect a more serious answer from a serious researcher who takes 911 research seriously?

That's a non-answer as warping of edges can easily be explained by the collapse of 110 stories of a one acre square building.

Oh btw, Occam called, he wants his razor back.
 
Last edited:
If the videos showed bounce-back or evidence of a plane's wake, I'd
change my mind.
Click to expand...

Bounce back? Seriously? Not sure why I expected better of you but I won't from here out.

Bounce back????

Geez.

{eta}

If anyone really wants, I'll do the math. I did it for the nope-lamers at Icke once, not really hard even for an arts and anthropology major turned carpenter.
 
Last edited:
ApolloGnomon said:
Bounce back? Seriously? Not sure why I expected better of you but I won't from here out.

Bounce back????

Geez.

{eta}

If anyone really wants, I'll do the math. I did it for the nope-lamers at Icke once, not really hard even for an arts and anthropology major turned carpenter.
Click to expand...
She may be refering to the motion her head made when she was dropped on the cement floor as a child...not sure.
 
ApolloGnomon said:
Bounce back? Seriously? Not sure why I expected better of you but I won't from here out.

Bounce back????

Geez.

{eta}

If anyone really wants, I'll do the math. I did it for the nope-lamers at Icke once, not really hard even for an arts and anthropology major turned carpenter.
Click to expand...

Bounce back? Scientist? Phd? Not in a million years.
 
This thread has run its course. In the last few pages it has devolved into name-calling and in-fighting. While you are free to start threads upon the 9-11 CT, do not try to reopen this discussion or take the fights elsewhere.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: kmortis
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom