What had happened in that WW III?
The Olympics
What had happened in that WW III?
20120823.2315
This may be why there is a whistling sound at the entry and exit of spirits when Ka Apaz is lying down and covered with bedsheet.
... I check whether it is logical or not, or proven by fact, like King Legum and Queen Agleloma and their daughter, Princess Reneliniyindi, of Egypt. Until I have proven it, I say that Ama revealed such and such. I pick up what I think will be good for my soul and discard what is evil. ...I will answer your posts in a while.
Reminds me of Dan'l and his San Francisco obsession.Yeah but PC keeps adding more and more incoherent nonsense. It's fun to see whatin the worldhe'll come up with next. For example, suppose there was a WWIII and everything was destroyed EXCEPT the Spratly Islands. Where would the goalposts end up?
20120824.1945
Five Conflicts That Could Roil Global Markets
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443855804577601583819562456.html
I will answer your posts in a while.
Thank you for all your help in my seeking out the truth. I do not accept everything that Ama says “hook, line, and sinker”. I check whether it is logical or not, or proven by fact, like King Legum and Queen Agleloma and their daughter, Princess Reneliniyindi, of Egypt. Until I have proven it, I say that Ama revealed such and such. I pick up what I think will be good for my soul and discard what is evil.
If I do not know the answer, I say I do not know. I am already old so I would like to share what I know. I like the way you scrutinize what I say. If I do not answer your question immediately, just repeat it because usually, I acknowledge those posted on the last page and/or on the previous page. In other words, the most recent ones.
The 2012 Olympic Games in London ended on 08-12. The prophecies failed. But Ama said that the war will happen from Spratly Islands, the Philippines being one of the claimants. And the threat of a war erupting there is still real.
I have here for your delectation an illustration of how absurd it is to assign significance to random numbers. Please note carefully the two characters at the bottom of the picture: They are both making an elementary mistake in reasoning which any skeptic here could have corrected for them (to wit, they should have ordered the veal).
[qimg]http://s3.amazonaws.com/stripgenerator/strip/45/14/76/00/00/full.png[/qimg]
Now, after you have considered my comments, please could you share with us why you consider coincidences to be convincing evidence?
20120825.0025
This is what I sent to the calendar list that I participate in.
I think the Spanish era’s usage ceased in the Iberian peninsula during the 14th century because the Spanish era and the Christian are almost the same.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_era , it was in 1383 AD when the Spanish era ceased in Castile. It was in fact, December 25, 1384 in the Spanish era, when it ceased its usage.
This is the entry at Wikipedia:
“The use of the Hispanic era probably began in Iberia in the 3rd century. The reason for its particular popularity is unknown. Usage died out in different parts of the Iberian peninsula at different times:
• In Catalonia, usage ceased after the Council of Tarragona in 1180 (Era MCCXVIII).
• In Aragon, Valencia, and Majorca, it was abandoned during the reign (between about 1217 and 1276) of James I.
In Castile, use was suppressed by John I in accord with the cortes of Segovia in 1383 (in fact, on December 25, 1384).”
In Castile, the Spanish year 1384 is divided by 33 equals 41.9. 41.9 x 32 = 1340.8. 1384 – 1340.8 = 43.2. Therefore, the Spanish era started in 43 BC. This is assuming that there are 32 solar years in 33 lunar years. Karl would be able to calculate the exact year.
It was not in 1180 AD when Catalonia ceased using the Spanish era. How 1180 was gotten, 38 was subtracted from 1218 (MCCXVIII). It was assuming that the Spanish era started in 38 BC and that it was using a solar calendar or a lunisolar calendar.
Ama revealed that Jesus was born on May 23. I found the year to be 33 BC. The start of the Spanish era in 43 BC and my calculated year when Jesus was born, 33 BC, are not that far away but far away from the assumed year of 1 BC.
I thought WW III will still come, but you say that it is over. What had happened in that WW III?
I am already old so I would like to share what I know.
...This is what I sent to the calendar list that I participate in. ...In Castile, the Spanish year 1384 is divided by 33 equals 41.9. 41.9 x 32 = 1340.8. 1384 – 1340.8 = 43.2. Therefore, the Spanish era started in 43 BC. This is assuming that there are 32 solar years in 33 lunar years. ...
Seconded.Maybe your best poster yet. Love "Le Lapin Rouge".
20120824.1945
I like the way you scrutinize what I say.
1911, the year China adopted the Gregorian calendar
PC, are you quite sure that the Roman Empire used a lunar calendar?
ETA
None of this changes the fact that KA's prediction about the 2012 Olympics was a false one, does it?
Seconded.
Is this evidence of the power of beignets to inspire artistic endeavours?
Did you know that there are only three people in this world who while still alive were being eaten by maggots? They were King Herod the Great (who killed innocent children), Adolf Hitler (for starting World War II), and Mariano(?) Chico of Baliwag, Bulacan, Philippines. This happened to Chico because he charged exorbitant interest rate.
Quatrain XII
A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,
A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread--and Thou
Beside me singing in the Wilderness--
Ignoring for the nonce your ghoulish hopes for global war, no doubt paralleled by your prayers for my eternal chastisement by Teh Wholly SpookTM, I turn instead to the question of how you go about verifying the lies told by that ignoble mountebank Ka Apaz.
Not the specific claims themselves--which are more ably dealt with by my knowledgeable colleagues--but your methods.
For instance, when you heard that a woman claimed to be keeping incorruptible corpses in a homemade crypt, did you bother to check out literature on "incorruptibility" other than that composed by rabid believers in supernatural phenomena? No, I thought not; you confined yourself to Wikipedia lists of pickled saints and such. Here is a book that I heartily recommend for your bedside table. It behooves you to give the skeptics equal time.
Let us turn to coincidences. I know from your ever-so-interesting website that you put great stock in synchronicity, especially with regards to numbers.
We see and hear hundreds if not thousands of numbers everyday: car license plates, phone numbers on caller ID, dates on e-mail, weather reports, cable tv channel listings, menu prices, store shelves and receipts, figures on bills, street addresses, bank statements, receipts, ticket stubs. Because we are inundated with numbers, it is inevitable that certain figures (even those of three digits or more) will bob up in the resultant puddles more than once. If you are looking for a specific number, you surely will notice it multiple times--but you are forgetting about the thousands of figures you also saw or heard yet did not consider significant and thus ignored. That is why most such coincidences are meaningless: You remember the hits but forget the misses.
I have here for your delectation an illustration of how absurd it is to assign significance to random numbers. Please note carefully the two characters at the bottom of the picture: They are both making an elementary mistake in reasoning which any skeptic here could have corrected for them (to wit, they should have ordered the veal).
[qimg]http://s3.amazonaws.com/stripgenerator/strip/45/14/76/00/00/full.png[/qimg]
Now, after you have considered my comments, please could you share with us why you consider coincidences to be convincing evidence?
Regarding the coincidences in my life, I only learn about them after the incident.