Warning: Jackchit threatens Gravy!

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL, indeed not!

LCF admins are going to have a busy night if they're going to remove EVERY thread where Dylan makes an arse of himself, though.
 
chipmunk stew said:
@tonicblue:

"Gravy is now flying the british flag in his avatar as a clear piss take."


Can you think of any other reason--say, oh I don't know, a major news item involving British citizens--why he might wish to fly the British flag? A display of solidarity, perhaps?
Click to expand...



Nope! Their first idea is their only idea! That's their strength!
 
so now how are Tarpley and the rest of the idiots going to justify their "USA is gonna invade Iran on Good Friday" crapalooza...

lol...oh the morons, the morons.

TAM:)
 
LashL said:
I have to disagree with you, boloboffin. It wasn't a matter of "busybodies", nor a matter of "unintended consequences", nor a matter of Rawkarma engaging in "self-serving conscience salv[ing]." It appears from your posts in this thread that you have presumed facts not in evidence, that you have accepted unsubstantiated assumptions as facts, and that you have leapt to conclusions without any basis in fact, even while you have purported to chastise others for committing the same (or lesser) errors. I suspect that you'll recognize that when you think about it.
Click to expand...

Yes, I am taking Jackchit's word for it that he was visited by Social Services. I am also taking Jack's word for it that he has an ex-wife who died and that her death removed a barrier to raising his children as he saw fit, for which he was grateful. I am taking his word on it that he was grateful, as well.

I'm also taking people at their word that they were going to call Social Services when they said they were going to. I'm also taking Jack's word for it that he means to inflict serious harm on a poster here who hasn't the remotest connection to the entire spectacle.

Taking people's word for what they are doing is the only thing we can do on the Internet. I have zero reason to doubt anybody's word in this affair, even the crackpot conspiracy theorist.

So I retract nothing.
 
boloboffin said:
Yes, I am taking Jackchit's word for it that he was visited by Social Services. I am also taking Jack's word for it that he has an ex-wife who died and that her death removed a barrier to raising his children as he saw fit, for which he was grateful. I am taking his word on it that he was grateful, as well.

I'm also taking people at their word that they were going to call Social Services when they said they were going to. I'm also taking Jack's word for it that he means to inflict serious harm on a poster here who hasn't the remotest connection to the entire spectacle.

Taking people's word for what they are doing is the only thing we can do on the Internet. I have zero reason to doubt anybody's word in this affair, even the crackpot conspiracy theorist.

So I retract nothing.
Click to expand...

I did not ask you to "retract" anything, bolo. That said, your response to my post seems to be a convoluted way of saying, "Yes" you did indeed presume facts not in evidence, that you have accepted unsubstantiated assumptions as facts, and that you have leapt to conclusions without any basis in fact, even while you have purported to chastise others for committing the same (or lesser) errors.

It is good of you to acknowledge that.

You are, of course, perfectly entitled to your opinion that those who were concerned in the other thread are "busybodies" just as I am perfectly entitled to my opinion to the contrary.

And while we're on the topic of opinions: in my opinion, your allegation that Rawkarma was engaging in "self-serving conscience salv[ing]" was uncalled for and unsubstantiated as well.

I noticed that you did not address these latter two points from my prior post/ I recognize that the first is of little import and arguing over it would be useless and would serve no purpose. The second, however, I have to say that I am surprised that you did not address it, being the accusation that it is against another member here.

ETA: I just saw and responded to your post as I was about to log out and go to bed so I will be unable to discuss this further tonight (this morning) should you choose to respond. Just a head's up.
 
Last edited:
I've only read the first page or so of this thread, and am wondering something.

Making a threat to kill is a serious offence in Australia, and I assume it would be in England too. Has anyone notified the police yet?
 
T.A.M. said:
so now how are Tarpley and the rest of the idiots going to justify their "USA is gonna invade Iran on Good Friday" crapalooza...

lol...oh the morons, the morons.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

If it happens on Saturday or Sunday, are they still the morons, the morons? How about next week?
 
Back to the topic; if murder has been threatened, why hasn't action Bin Taken? Come on! This is serious!

The threatened isn't too busy or lazy to take legal action, I hope!
 
skepticalcriticalguy said:
Back to the topic; if murder has been threatened, why hasn't action Bin Taken? Come on! This is serious!

The threatened isn't too busy or lazy to take legal action, I hope!
Click to expand...


Well, I know this will cost my life but since "Mr. Dylan Irresponsibly"
didn't care about probable legal consequences of his administration
and for his firm, I wrote a letter to InvisionFree.

Watch out, Jackchit: InvisionFree is comming for ya!!!11!!OMG!1!!! :D

...I wrote to God Molech himself and he will send out his NWO
Troops to hunt and sacrifice them in Boo!-hemian Grove...
rolleyes.gif
 
Last edited:
skepticalcriticalguy said:
Back to the topic; if murder has been threatened, why hasn't action Bin Taken? Come on! This is serious!

The threatened isn't too busy or lazy to take legal action, I hope!
Click to expand...

Present your evidence that action hasn't been taken, fool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom