Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

[twinstead]

Anders how do you know any "experts" you have listened to that believe there were no planes aren't actors testing their skills by convincing gullible people to believe wild fantasies as reality?

 

[Bell]

I knew someone on Flight 93. Am I an actor?

To add, both JREF members Thunder and Dtugg saw United 175 fly into the South Tower.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

To add, both JREF members Thunder and Dtugg saw United 175 fly into the South Tower.

So did FoolMeWunz.

 

[twinstead]

Well, it could be worse; I'd rather talk to a polite crazy person than an arrogant one. We DO have both here ya know.

 

[PS13]

I'll say it a third time. There is no way I believe for a second that this Anders guy is 'for real'. He's putting everyone on. This is a joke to him... he's just trolling.

I can't believe this thread is 36 pages now, in only 9 days at that. He's here just to get a reaction. He's not interested in actually learning anything. He just wants to argue and probably gets off on the attention.


Pathetic Anders, really pathetic.

 

[daws59]

I'll say it a third time. There is no way I believe for a second that this Anders guy is 'for real'. He's putting everyone on. This is a joke to him... he's just trolling.

I can't believe this thread is 36 pages now, in only 9 days at that. He's here just to get a reaction. He's not interested in actually learning anything. He just wants to argue and probably gets off on the attention.


Pathetic Anders, really pathetic.

I've seen this before on other sites...BUMP!

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Well, it could be worse; I'd rather talk to a polite crazy person than an arrogant one. We DO have both here ya know.

This is true. That's the entire reason I'm not about to go off on the guy; he's been completely polite this entire time. Whacky, true, but quite polite. I don't want that to change. We've got enough jerks here (myself included on occasion ).

 

[Anders Lindman]

No expert has claimed that................only truthers.

But surely some truthers are experts, or?

 

[Anders Lindman]

What if an expert told you just the opposite, that the maneuvers were NOT improbable? Would you take that into consideration, or do you just listen to people whom you agree with?

Then I would like to see some debates with experts from both sides to get an idea about it.

 

[daws59]

But surely some truthers are experts, or?

Experts in denial of empirical evidence, most certainly!
Or just as they appear...incapable of analytical thought or reason.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Experts in denial of empirical evidence, most certainly!
Or just as they appear...incapable of analytical thought or reason.

Like all black boxes evaporating into thin air? And all jet engines except one of the wrong type just vanishing too? That sounds pretty suspicious to me.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Like all black boxes evaporating into thin air? And all jet engines except one of the wrong type just vanishing too? That sounds pretty suspicious to me.

Got evidence for your suspicion? What kind of engine is it and how do you know?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Got evidence for your suspicion? What kind of engine is it and how do you know?

I'm no expert on jet engines. A person who claims to be an expert said: "I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67."

From: http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm

 

[BigAl]

I'm no expert on jet engines. A person who claims to be an expert said: "I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67."

From: http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm

You are being lied to by people that use the word, "truth" much too much.

 

[Anders Lindman]

You ae being lied to by people that use the word, "truth" much too much.

So you have any official source confirming the type of the jet engine found?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I'm no expert on jet engines. A person who claims to be an expert said: "I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67."

From: http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm

I suspect the person who claimed to be an expert is quite correct about that. However I see nothing to persuade me that the engine in question is that particular model.

Any good reason not to believe it was, say, a GE CF6? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CF6-6_engine_cutaway.jpg

 

[twinstead]

I'm no expert on jet engines. A person who claims to be an expert said: "I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67."

From: http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm

How do you know he's not lying to you? How do you know he's an expert? How do you know he's not some actor trying to fool you? How do you know he really exists?

See? This is what you say when confronted with evidence that contradicts your theory, too. It's frustrating, no?

 

[Regnad Kcin]

As for Flight 11 not existing, yes, a massive, massive cover-up.

...involving just a few dudes, right?

 

[Regnad Kcin]

All that is a part of the immense cover-up. The cover-up HAD to be done in order for mainstream media and politics to remain functioning.

A cover-up involving just a few dudes, right?

 

[Regnad Kcin]

I admit that it would require a HUGE cover-up, involving thousands and thousands of people. Yet, that's what I believe was done, and is still being done.

I thought you said it was a very small group.

Oh, I see. Thousands and thousands is small compared with the billions of people alive.