True skeptics are 'conspiracy theorists'

Davidjayjordan said:
Jim, that was my line, as the vast majority of you have not pieced together anything or any truths, and so have no back up for anything you say.

Your posts are linked to nothingness and hence mean the same... nothing.

You have no websites because you have made no connections in the real world or real science.

Get busy or go get a heavyweight that has thought through a few areas of life.

There must be a least one intelligent person among you.
Click to expand...
You're right that I have no web sites. What is this indicative of? That I don't want to spread false prophecies like a certain moron who likes to spout nonsense here. Has the initials DJJ. Think you might know him.
I also agree my posts are linked to nothingness, since I haven't linked to anything. Again, totally pointless.
As far as connections to the real world, I've been 2/3's of the way around this globe, been in all but 5 states in the US, married twice, have three daughters, have more friends than you have people you've met, so if anyone can claim connection to the real world between the two of us, well, you lose! Sorry, come again! I don't lay in bed whining about things, run away when things get hard, or leave children in danger. That's you, remember?
You're still a liar, a coward, and an intellectual flyweight. You have posted nothing of any substance since you've been here. This is the last communication there will be between us. Sorry, dude, you're just not worth my time and effort.
Ignore, meet DJJ. DJJ, meet ignore.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Miles.... If you have the ability to read, you will note, that the vast majority of false skeptics HERE believe that their giovernment has not lied to them about 9/11, the Kennedy assaination or anything of importance. They are the systemites of systemites, that will defend their government no matter what because they are grounded only in what they are told and they see in print.

They don;t want to see beneath the surface as it will rock their boat and they will have to go COURAGEOUSLY beyond what the majority think and do. Therefore they complain and whine and oppose anyone or any revelation of any conspiracy against them. They wanting to eblieve that they are in control rather than to eblieve the rich and powerful control them. Its false machismo, but that's the main underlying motivation of false skeptics. They are comforatble in their sheltered world and want to keep it that way, and their false skepticism gives them an excuse for being gutless and complient and submissive to the higher powers.

They are the church people of all church people.

Pew dwellers.
Click to expand...
And what meaning do you expect your delusionally self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?
 
I was under the Air Force’s “Human reliability program” and one of the things well learned is that a secret is hard to keep. One person is almost impossible and any more after that is impossible. So with the hundreds needed for 9/11, there would be no possible way to keep it a secret for long. And also, if they had that much power, why is anyone that is talking about it still alive.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
JimBenArm said:
You're right that I have no web sites. What is this indicative of? That I don't want to spread false prophecies like a certain moron who likes to spout nonsense here. Has the initials DJJ. Think you might know him.
I also agree my posts are linked to nothingness, since I haven't linked to anything. Again, totally pointless.
As far as connections to the real world, I've been 2/3's of the way around this globe, been in all but 5 states in the US, married twice, have three daughters, have more friends than you have people you've met, so if anyone can claim connection to the real world between the two of us, well, you lose! Sorry, come again! I don't lay in bed whining about things, run away when things get hard, or leave children in danger. That's you, remember?
You're still a liar, a coward, and an intellectual flyweight. You have posted nothing of any substance since you've been here. This is the last communication there will be between us. Sorry, dude, you're just not worth my time and effort.
Ignore, meet DJJ. DJJ, meet ignore.
Click to expand...

Yes as the Good Lord said in so many ways.... Avoid the devoid.

Do put me on IGNORE as I hope also to do the same to you.

.
 
Paulhoff said:
I was under the Air Force’s “Human reliability program” and one of the things well learned is that a secret is hard to keep. One person is almost impossible and any more after that is impossible. So with the hundreds needed for 9/11, there would be no possible way to keep it a secret for long. And also, if they had that much power, why is anyone that is talking about it still alive.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...

Ahhh ... the proverbial excuse why not to believe in conspiracies, as tooo many people would be involved.... and they would have to intimidate too many people as with Kennedy's assasination, and kill tooo many witnesses as in the Kennedy conspiracy, and lock away too much inofrmation as with the Kennedy conspiracy, and by the time the majority find out it will be too late.

Nevertheless the true skeptics figured out that magic bullets don't do their magic pathways from one shooter alone... and we know absolutely that it was a conspiracy, and so with killing a president, it is easy to go beyond, and make up names, and kill all witnesses and terrorists, and then torture someone years later to confess ... to being tortured over and over and over again.

But the false skeptics go on believeing their government wouldn't intimidate anyone or kill any witnesses ... especially the false skeptics that go with the flow and the status quo and ACCEPT all Warren Commissions, commissioned to cover up their conspiracies.
 
What did Hitler prove... tell a BIG enough LIE, and you can get away with it and so the governments of this world have yielded to his advice. For the rich and powerful do want to keep their riches and power to the END.... and they will til the Lord intervenes.... and then the false skeptics will howl.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Ahhh ... the proverbial excuse why not to believe in conspiracies, as tooo many people would be involved.... and they would have to intimidate too many people as with Kennedy's assasination, and kill tooo many witnesses as in the Kennedy conspiracy.
Click to expand...
Then why are you still alive, why..................

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Davidjayjordan said:
What did Hitler prove... tell a BIG enough LIE, and you can get away with it and so the governments of this world have yielded to his advice. For the rich and powerful do want to keep their riches and power to the END.... and they will til the Lord intervenes.... and then the false skeptics will howl.
Click to expand...
So why did the Watergate scandal happen?
 
DJJ....

Your ramblings and your website are complete rubbish bins of egotism, and your 100% wrong on all things.

Cheers
 
WildCat said:
So you quickly recognized that the troof movement is nothing but lies, right?

If it's the other way around (as if I don't know...), can you point out one single error in the NIST reports or the 9/11 Commission report? No troofer has been able to do so to date, perhaps you'll be the first?
Click to expand...
You don't understant. The 9/11 commission report did not fail because of lies it included.

Rather, it just didn't answer many important questions:

- what about the july 11 metting between Rice and Tenet?
- What about N. Mineta's accout?
- What about WTC7?
- What about the links between some of the terrorists and the ISI?
- etc....

The Commission did not take the risk to tell big lies. Rather, they were very careful which intel to insert and which intel not to insert.

Moreover, some asumptions made by the Commission can't be checked because we can't check most of the sources. For instance, we are told to believe that the "60 miles ou" descrepancy regrading F93 that was never closer than 130 miles is due to a projected path thx to the Tigerwall system (though the system is not mentionned, another thing they forgot.) We are told to believe that it "may" explain the flaw, because a guy "Tim Grovack" said so"... (we don't know anything about this guy)

And so on...

When do we gain access to the commission sources?

B
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Asking questions, ignoring answers since 2001.
Click to expand...
My friend, altough some questions have been answered through these fruitful debates, many of your answers have so far failed to answer serious questions that would require subpoena.

How do you find out if Gonzales etc... have indeed fired the attorneys? Subpoena, obviously, otherwise, you'll have the Gonzie fans screaming:

"where is your evidence, huh!!"

And we would keep saying: they fired them in purpose, ask Rove etc...

But still you would say: bah, they have nothing these truthers, no evidence, nada.

If the dems used their subpoena powers for 9/11, asking some real questions about who knew what in the months before the attacks, and we could finally find out wether or not they LIHOP.
 
busherie said:
My friend, altough some questions have been answered through these fruitful debates, many of your answers have so far failed to answer serious questions that would require subpoena.

How do you find out if Gonzales etc... have indeed fired the attorneys? Subpoena, obviously, otherwise, you'll have the Gonzie fans screaming:

"where is your evidence, huh!!"

And we would keep saying: they fired them in purpose, ask Rove etc...

But still you would say: bah, they have nothing these truthers, no evidence, nada.

If the dems used their subpoena powers for 9/11, asking some real questions about who knew what in the months before the attacks, and we could finally find out wether or not they LIHOP.
Click to expand...
And again, no answer.... When it gets tough, you flee, so classic.
 
busherie said:
You don't understant. The 9/11 commission report did not fail because of lies it included.

Rather, it just didn't answer many important questions:

- what about the july 11 metting between Rice and Tenet?
- What about N. Mineta's accout?
- What about WTC7?
- What about the links between some of the terrorists and the ISI?
- etc....

The Commission did not take the risk to tell big lies. Rather, they were very careful which intel to insert and which intel not to insert.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you and like-minded people should get together and look into this. You know, do some research, discuss your findings online. Maybe you could make a movie detailing your findings...better yet, two movies. No, hundreds of them! Maybe you should do that, since you don't trust either the government or experts to investigate these questions, then we can put this whole thing to rest. Otherwise it's just mental masturbation on an epic scale.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom