Top Down Demolition.

[Heiwa]

PROVE IT.

very simple.

provide a citation saying JUST that.

come on twoof.

Just check with French authorities. Before destruction the building was cleaned out, e.g. any asbetsos was removed not to damage health of workers later.

Advice: Be polite when you contact French authorities. Note; we do not speak English here, so brush up your French!

 

[stateofgrace]

Just check with French authorities. Before destruction the building was cleaned out, e.g. any asbetsos was removed not to damage health of workers later.

Advice: Be polite when you contact French authorities. Note; we do not speak English here, so brush up your French!

That is not what you said. You said

As they say - you remove structural elements (external walls of part below, etc) so that the remaining building is like a 'house of cards' and then it is very easy to destroy it with hydraulics, etc. as seen.

So what you see is a partially dismantled structure (a 'house of cards') given a little kick so it collapses.

We French are really clever.

Where is your source? ( third time of asking )

 

[Heiwa]

Where is your source? ( third time of asking )

It was in the post/link I commented upon. A person, in the video, explains, in French, why the building was destroyed so easily. The building had been prepared (!!), etc, etc, like a house of cards, and just needed a little kick. Pls, brush up your French!

 

[stateofgrace]

It was in the post/link I commented upon. A person, in the video, explains, in French, why the building was destroyed so easily. The building had been prepared (!!), etc, etc, like a house of cards, and just needed a little kick. Pls, brush up your French!

Really?

Since my French isn't that good, you won't mind pointing to the exact part where they say structural elements and external walls from below were removed.

 

[TruthersLie]

Just check with French authorities. Before destruction the building was cleaned out, e.g. any asbetsos was removed not to damage health of workers later.

Advice: Be polite when you contact French authorities. Note; we do not speak English here, so brush up your French!

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You have to be kidding me. That is a GREAT joke.

Yes, they do clean out the building. They remove the drywall, and pull out everythign they can.

how is CLEANING OUT THE BUILDING the same as making the building unable to take a "small lateral push?" ????

Oh poor Anders.

Provide a citation which shows they WEAKENED the lower sections.
Taking out the drywall and insulation isn't weakening the lower floors.

Or does drywall, insulation and piping support the building?

<facepalm>

 

[TruthersLie]

It was in the post/link I commented upon. A person, in the video, explains, in French, why the building was destroyed so easily. The building had been prepared (!!), etc, etc, like a house of cards, and just needed a little kick. Pls, brush up your French!

Provide a CITATION or a quote.

or admit that you are full of crap.

 

[Justin39640]

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You have to be kidding me. That is a GREAT joke.

Yes, they do clean out the building. They remove the drywall, and pull out everythign they can.

how is CLEANING OUT THE BUILDING the same as making the building unable to take a "small lateral push?" ????

Oh poor Anders.

Provide a citation which shows they WEAKENED the lower sections.
Taking out the drywall and insulation isn't weakening the lower floors.

Or does drywall, insulation and piping support the building?

<facepalm>

apparently anders here thinks asbestos is a structural element lol

 

[Heiwa]

apparently anders here thinks asbestos is a structural element lol

?? No, it is a health matter. You have to remove it, carefully, before you destroy a building. Not done at WTC on 911 causing a lot of health problems of clean up staff! Topic of another thread?

 

[Justin39640]

?? No, it is a health matter. You have to remove it, carefully, before you destroy a building.

yeah and what does that have to do with your ideas on "weakening the building"

Not done at WTC on 911 causing a lot of health problems of clean up staff! Topic of another thread?

not really
youre the one who brought it up in post 121 of this thread on this page

 

[TruthersLie]

come on anders.

either provide a citation showing the the verinage technique WEAKENS the lower floors, or STFU and admit that you are wrong

I love his new tack... the building is too old and that is why they collapsed the way they did. ROFLMAO.

so we have it didn't meet your requirement 4 (which it did), now they are too old and of course would collapse because they are unpredictible, and your claim here that they were preweakened (with NO citations to back it up)

PROVIDE THE QUOTE or the CITATION or admit that you don't know what you are talking about. (like RONIN POINT)

Again and again, can 49% crushdown 51%? Come on anders, don't wimp out now.

 

[Justin39640]

come on anders.

either provide a citation showing the the verinage technique WEAKENS the lower floors, or STFU and admit that you are wrong

I love his new tack... the building is too old and that is why they collapsed the way they did. ROFLMAO.

so we have it didn't meet your requirement 4 (which it did), now they are too old and of course would collapse because they are unpredictible, and your claim here that they were preweakened (with NO citations to back it up)

PROVIDE THE QUOTE or the CITATION or admit that you don't know what you are talking about. (like RONIN POINT)

Again and again, can 49% crushdown 51%? Come on anders, don't wimp out now.

ive been google translating a few french pages on the subject and none talk about "pre-weakening"
its all about the top part crushing down the lower part
translated page

 

[Lupie]

P.S. Do you list "debunker" on your resumes and applications?

Well,

Since I have been gainfully employed for many years now, I have not had the need to compose a resume or fill out a job application. However, I happen to own the company that I work for, and in my position I see the job applications and the resume of every person who comes to me for a job. Not long ago, a fellow who put in an application mentioned in his resume that he was involved in the "9/11 truth movement". He further confirmed this fact in person during his interview. At that point, the interview was stopped, and he was shown the door. Words, actions, and the people/organizations a person chooses to associate themselves with can have real world consequences.

L.

P.S. Do you list "truther" on YOUR resume and various applications?

 

[fourtoe]

Well,

Since I have been gainfully employed for many years now, I have not had the need to compose a resume or fill out a job application. However, I happen to own the company that I work for, and in my position I see the job applications and the resume of every person who comes to me for a job. Not long ago, a fellow who put in an application mentioned in his resume that he was involved in the "9/11 truth movement". He further confirmed this fact in person during his interview. At that point, the interview was stopped, and he was shown the door. Words, actions, and the people/organizations a person chooses to associate themselves with can have real world consequences.

L.

P.S. Do you list "truther" on YOUR resume and various applications?

Would you hire if I put I was in the NWO, a debunker and posted on JREF? Or to be even more concise, I could just put I was,still am a shill?

 

[leftysergeant]

It was in the post/link I commented upon. A person, in the video, explains, in French, why the building was destroyed so easily. The building had been prepared (!!), etc, etc, like a house of cards, and just needed a little kick. Pls, brush up your French!

They prepared one sction of the building, high up, that they knew would be heavy enough to crush the unprpared part, and gave that part a little kick.

Just as a house of cards is strrong enough to bear its own weight as a staticload, but falls apart when the top becomes a dynamic load, so did the French structures. You are committing a falacy of language.

 

[Lupie]

Would you hire if I put I was in the NWO, a debunker and posted on JREF? Or to be even more concise, I could just put I was,still am a shill?

Sure, why not. Do you have any flight experience? My handlers recently bestowed upon me a shiny new black helicopter, and I need an agent/shill to fly it while I lay down some chemtrails. Let me know, we'll do lunch.

 

[triforcharity]

I know how to fly helo's!!! Pick me pick me!!! I'll do it, but you gotta let me spray some chemtrails someday. I don't have alot of Shill experience, but I could learn.

BTW, does this job come with benefits?? I need a new pool table....

 

[Lupie]

I know how to fly helo's!!! Pick me pick me!!! I'll do it, but you gotta let me spray some chemtrails someday. I don't have alot of Shill experience, but I could learn.

BTW, does this job come with benefits?? I need a new pool table....

OK, you get the pilot seat, Colobus can be door gunner, and I'll handle the chemtrails. I love it when a plan comes together.

L.

 

[BigAl]

OK, you get the pilot seat, Colobus can be door gunner, and I'll handle the chemtrails. I love it when a plan comes together.

L.

I love the smell of chemtrails in the morning...

 

[Audible Click]

I know how to fly helo's!!! Pick me pick me!!! I'll do it, but you gotta let me spray some chemtrails someday. I don't have alot of Shill experience, but I could learn.

BTW, does this job come with benefits?? I need a new pool table....

Are you kidding? We're still being served peanut butter and crackers as a canape at the Super Secret Yearly NWO Meeting! Agents El Mondo Hummus and Wicked Lovely will confirm this....maybe.

 

[Horatius]

ive been google translating a few french pages on the subject and none talk about "pre-weakening"
its all about the top part crushing down the lower part
translated page

That article mentions this technique being patented. Guess what I've found!

From a machine translation of the description of European Patent 1 082 505:

The purpose of the present invention is to cure this lack by proposing a process and equipment of demolition which can be appropriate for any type of buildings without limitation height. It is of course about a process which does not have recourse to the explosive ones, involving a demolition which does not exceed the influence of the building on the ground, having a very low cost of putting in work to that of caving since it is not required to envisage the evacuation of a perimeter of safety, nor the interruption of the circulation, and whose completion date is relatively rapid. In addition, this process is also without danger to the operators since it is not required to weaken the structure of the building. Moreover, it can be supplemented by a safety device which makes it possible to restore the stability of the building on the assumption that a technical incident would intervene front the final phase of demolition.

one remote control rotation of the aforesaid winch arranged to draw on the cable from reeving, reflecting this tractive effort on the strands and pulleys of reeving so as to cut down the load-bearing walls in a defined direction causing the collapse the flagstones and the walls of the upper stages on those of the low stages which collapse on themselves under 1 ' effect of the weight of the upper stages.

In reference on figure 1, building 1 to demolish consists of a whole of load-bearing walls 2 refer currently the veils and of a whole of flagstones 3 defining the numbered stages of the ground floor in 17th. The load-bearing walls 2 and flagstones 3 form schematically a squaring of parts 4. The process of demolition according to 1 ' invention consists in demolishing this building by collapse of high to the bottom, while exerting with a selected stage for example in the last third one of the building and precisely in the example illustrated with the 13th stage, a traction between two parallel load-bearing walls directed in the diagonal one, resulting in ' cutting down these two load-bearing walls in the direction the arrow F, involving the collapse of the other load-bearing walls and the flagstones the upper stages which subside the ones on the other ones and, by their weight, cause the collapse of the low stages. This operation of slaughtering is enough to demolish the building in only one operation. The possible remaining parts are then demolished with the hydraulic shovel.

So the inventor of this technique explicitly contradicts Heiwa's two main points. The End.