Top Down Demolition.

Astute Perspicuous

Banned
A
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
139
Well, I have heard a bunch of so-called, self proclaimed "debunkers" bring up that they have never seen a top down implosion.

Well, here is your chance. Wow, how close it does resemble something we saw 8 years and 15 days ago.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=syzKBBB_THE

Have an excellent day.

P.S. Do you list "debunker" on your resumes and applications?
 
Didn't we have all these people claiming that crush down was impossible? Heiwa? bill smith? You? I love the delicious irony of this... It's so delicious oh very so...


Astute Perspicuous said:
P.S. Do you list "debunker" on your resumes and applications?
Click to expand...
Yes, because it completely messes with your wanker. We are out to get yoooooou!!!!!! :tinfoil
 
Last edited:
Astute Perspicuous said:
Well, I have heard a bunch of so-called, self proclaimed "debunkers" bring up that they have never seen a top down implosion.

Well, here is your chance. Wow, how close it does resemble something we saw 8 years and 15 days ago.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=syzKBBB_THE

Have an excellent day.

P.S. Do you list "debunker" on your resumes and applications?
Click to expand...

Yes, we have seen this so called Top Down Controlled Demolition video several times. Actually, the bottom part of the structure (a stripped out concrete HLM) is completely destroyed first and the top part evidently drops down into the rubble. No implosion of any kind. Just clever, French controlled demolition - it looks like WTC 7!

I have described it at http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm .
 
Hey dude...it's NOT crush down...it's 6 floors coming down on 5 and you can see in the aftermath that the pile is still basically 4 stories tall so wrong again.
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Hey dude...it's NOT crush down...it's 6 floors coming down on 5 and you can see in the aftermath that the pile is still basically 4 stories tall so wrong again.
Click to expand...
I thought crush down to you people was the same... except the top portion had to be <50% to do it. What changed?
 
Last edited:
Astute Perspicuous said:
Hey dude...it's NOT crush down...it's 6 floors coming down on 5 and you can see in the aftermath that the pile is still basically 4 stories tall so wrong again.
Click to expand...

Can't you see that they destroy the lower part of the structure first? And that the intact top drops down into the rubble? This is classic controlled demolition from bottom up! And it actually looks like WTC 7!
 
Heiwa said:
Can't you see that they destroy the lower part of the structure first? And that the intact top drops down into the rubble? This is classic controlled demolition from bottom up! And it actually looks like WTC 7!
Click to expand...

Evidence? Lemons?
 
Heiwa said:
Can't you see that they destroy the lower part of the structure first? And that the intact top drops down into the rubble? This is classic controlled demolition from bottom up! And it actually looks like WTC 7!
Click to expand...

Are you blind?
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Have an excellent day.

P.S. Do you list "debunker" on your resumes and applications?
Click to expand...

Now I will!

And you too, have a kick ass day!

NiceGorillaSharkHighFive.png
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Trying to be a smart ass you made yourself look like a fool? You still think we are in July do you?
Click to expand...

I'm well aware of the date. It seems as though you are unable to do simple math. 8 years and 15 days means that 8 years plus 15 days, which would be 8/11/01. If you were referring to 9/11, that happened 8 years minus 15 days ago.
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Well, I have heard a bunch of so-called, self proclaimed "debunkers" bring up that they have never seen a top down implosion.

Well, here is your chance. Wow, how close it does resemble something we saw 8 years and 15 days ago.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=syzKBBB_THE

Have an excellent day.

P.S. Do you list "debunker" on your resumes and applications?
Click to expand...

Ummm wow you are sooooo behind the times.

You do realize that
1. This is a gravity collapse. They did not destroy the lower floors. They pulled (doh) out the support on 2 floors in the middle of the structure and let the top crush the bottom.

Pay attention twoof.

2. Watch it again, it isn't a top down controlled demoltions.
this is

do you see the difference? I know that I do.

3. The Balaz demolition is NOT a top down implosion (note the word implosion, that means with EXPLOSIVES... no explosives were used in Balaz.

4. Now that we have looked at both (actually all three if you consider the towers), examine them. What do you hear in the top down CD? What? Oh massive explosions. What do you hear in the Balaz video? Nothing. Why not? Oh they didn't use explosives, the used hydraulics and let it CRUSH DOWN (doh). What don't you hear in the towers collapses? (hint... explosives)

There is a MASSIVE difference.

ETA: Do you list "villiage idiot" on yours?
 
Last edited:
Heiwa said:
Yes, we have seen this so called Top Down Controlled Demolition video several times. Actually, the bottom part of the structure (a stripped out concrete HLM) is completely destroyed first and the top part evidently drops down into the rubble. No implosion of any kind. Just clever, French controlled demolition - it looks like WTC 7!

I have described it at http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm .
Click to expand...

why didnt the lower part arrest the collapse?
 
DC said:
why didnt the lower part arrest the collapse?
Click to expand...

The lower part is already partly destroyed (to initiate the controlled destruction) and what is left intact below is much smaller than the (bigger) upper, intact part dropping down. Clever French controlled demolition starting at the bottom. Looks like WTC 7!

The Turks tried to do something similarly (starting at bottom) recently but failed! Top part rolled away.
 
Heiwa said:
The lower part is already partly destroyed (to initiate the controlled destruction) and what is left intact below is much smaller than the (bigger) upper, intact part dropping down. Clever French controlled demolition starting at the bottom. Looks like WTC 7!

The Turks tried to do something similarly (starting at bottom) recently but failed! Top part rolled away.
Click to expand...

No! Evidently Part C is smaller than Part A and Part C one-way crushed down part A. Not possible!
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Well, I have heard a bunch of so-called, self proclaimed "debunkers" bring up that they have never seen a top down implosion.

Well, here is your chance. Wow, how close it does resemble something we saw 8 years and 15 days ago.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=syzKBBB_THE

Have an excellent day.

P.S. Do you list "debunker" on your resumes and applications?
Click to expand...

You aren't very good at this, are you.

Hint: Hiewa coming to your rescue isn't helping.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom