Top Down Demolition.

Gentlemen (and gentleladies)

Lets stick on topic.

Heiwa, do you have any proof or citations which state that in verinage demolitions technique that they PRE WEAKEN the lower floors?

Come on Heiwa and other twoofs don't be such intellectual cowards.

Heiwa, do you want to revise your statement about no one way crush down being possible EVER?

It is nice to know that the Verinage demolitions all meet the Heiwa challenge and show that it is possible though.

(p.s. heiwa, did you have a nice 3 day break?)
 
Horatius.

I know. I read your post... I just want to see him continue to make an absolute donkey out of himself.

I loved your find.
 
Hey I always have this problem of learning about stuff on the internet, I cannot pronounce terms or people's last names irl.

Could someone be totally awesome and write how to say verinage phonetically?

I think it is like, vurr-nodge but it could also be verr-nadgssssh obviously I need some help.
 
knife fight colobus said:
Hey I always have this problem of learning about stuff on the internet, I cannot pronounce terms or people's last names irl.

Could someone be totally awesome and write how to say verinage phonetically?

I think it is like, vurr-nodge but it could also be verr-nadgssssh obviously I need some help.
Click to expand...

If it's French it's probably something like very-naash. Say it with a French-sounding R for extra effect :)
 
tuc0 said:
If it's French it's probably something like very-naash. Say it with a French-sounding R for extra effect :)
Click to expand...


Yeah I starting doing a French accent when pronouncing it, I'm glad I went down the right path. Thanks!

I cannot wait to bring this up to all the Truthers on 911.
 
knife fight colobus said:
Hey I always have this problem of learning about stuff on the internet, I cannot pronounce terms or people's last names irl.

Could someone be totally awesome and write how to say verinage phonetically?

I think it is like, vurr-nodge but it could also be verr-nadgssssh obviously I need some help.
Click to expand...

very-narge

Stress the second syllable, and give it a long 'a' sound, like 'bar'. The 'ge' comes out soft, like .... um .... well, a bit like the 'ge' in 'barge' but a tad softer. Unless you come from the deep south of france. Or the far east. Or Brittany. :D
 
GlennB said:
Without going back through all of them, they seem to be mostly of standard RC construction. The point is, of course, that Heiwa's bilgesque theories make no allowances for construction method. It's just "impossible", according to him. Period.
Click to expand...

Yes, you are right. Dropping a part, C, of a structure on itself, A, and expecting C will one-way crush A is impossible as per the Björkman's axiom:

A smaller part of an isotropic or composite 3-D structure, when dropped on and impacting a greater part of same structure by gravity, cannot one-way crush down the greater part of the structure.

It seems Björkman knows what he is talking about!
 
Heiwa said:
Yes, you are right. Dropping a part, C, of a structure on itself, A, and expecting C will one-way crush A is impossible as per the Björkman's axiom:

A smaller part of an isotropic or composite 3-D structure, when dropped on and impacting a greater part of same structure by gravity, cannot one-way crush down the greater part of the structure.

It seems Björkman knows what he is talking about!
Click to expand...

And yet we have seen videos where exactly that that has happenend. Its amazing how you can just sit there and ignore it.
 
Heiwa said:
Yes, you are right. Dropping a part, C, of a structure on itself, A, and expecting C will one-way crush A is impossible as per the Björkman's axiom:

A smaller part of an isotropic or composite 3-D structure, when dropped on and impacting a greater part of same structure by gravity, cannot one-way crush down the greater part of the structure.

It seems Björkman knows what he is talking about!
Click to expand...

And this axiom applies to the verinage technique how, exactly?
 
D'rok said:
And this axiom applies to the verinage technique how, exactly?
Click to expand...

Well, the technique vérinage is about jacking part of a structure, the complete upper one I assume, so that the upper part gets lose and , voilà, the whole structure below collapses like a house of cards, believe or not!

It has nothing to do with the axiom. Pls Google for the axiom and you will find out.
 
Heiwa said:
the whole structure below collapses like a house of cards, believe or not!
Click to expand...

That's because C one-way crushes A. You're axiom has been proven wrong. Please stop making a fool out of yourself. It's embarrassing to see. :blush:
 
Heiwa said:
The axiom has been proven wrong!? Link, please.
Click to expand...

I'm a n00b, so I can't make links. But it's obvious to everybody but you that the verinage-technique proves the axiom wrong. Small part C crushes big part A when C is dropped on the larger part A. :jaw-dropp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom