Merged To disclose, or not

Your best sources are David Wilcock and the two most important Secret Space Programme whistleblowers are Corey Goode and William Tompkinson . The latter debriefed over 1000 of the hand picked SS Nazi scientists who were taken into the US at the end of WW2 . I have enjoyed following the cutting edge factions involved in this narrative for many years and suspect that little will be resolved until the current battles that are pivotal to the Antarctic region are resolved . And if you don't know what I am talking about , I suggest you get down to some serious research and avoid the need to ask questions which are in large part being answered right now . But if you think there is anybody else on this chat site who has even an inkling of this subject matter , I can assure you the answer is a a 100% No .
 
Last edited:
Malbec said:
Your best sources are David Wilcock and the two most important Secret Space Programme whistleblowers are Corey Goode and William Tompkinson . The latter debriefed over 1000 of the hand picked SS Nazi scientists who were taken into the US at the end of WW2 . I have enjoyed following the cutting edge factions involved in this narrative for many years and suspect that little will be resolved until the current battles that are pivotal to the Antarctic region are resolved . And if you don't know what I am talking about , I suggest you get down to some serious research and avoid the need to ask questions which are in large part being answered right now . But if you think there is anybody else on this chat site who has even an inkling of this subject matter , I can assure you the answer is a a 100% No .
Click to expand...

Wait Malbec...are you actually pretending to be an expert on this?

YOU? Lol
 
Malbec said:
Your best sources are David Wilcock and the two most important Secret Space Programme whistleblowers are Corey Goode and William Tompkinson . The latter debriefed over 1000 of the hand picked SS Nazi scientists who were taken into the US at the end of WW2 . I have enjoyed following the cutting edge factions involved in this narrative for many years and suspect that little will be resolved until the current battles that are pivotal to the Antarctic region are resolved . And if you don't know what I am talking about , I suggest you get down to some serious research and avoid the need to ask questions which are in large part being answered right now . But if you think there is anybody else on this chat site who has even an inkling of this subject matter , I can assure you the answer is a a 100% No .
Click to expand...


OK Thanks.

Care to weigh in on the disclose or not disclose question in the OP?
.
 
Malbec said:
Your best sources are David Wilcock and the two most important Secret Space Programme whistleblowers are Corey Goode and William Tompkinson . The latter debriefed over 1000 of the hand picked SS Nazi scientists who were taken into the US at the end of WW2 . I have enjoyed following the cutting edge factions involved in this narrative for many years and suspect that little will be resolved until the current battles that are pivotal to the Antarctic region are resolved . And if you don't know what I am talking about , I suggest you get down to some serious research and avoid the need to ask questions which are in large part being answered right now . But if you think there is anybody else on this chat site who has even an inkling of this subject matter , I can assure you the answer is a a 100% No .
Click to expand...

That's because you're making it up like kyoon's illuminati. What the **** is wrong with the world, that you need to make these bizarre concoctions up and sit there posting your little vague assertions you know something, titter giggle, but you'll not be telling us, nope nope.

Pm me with three links on the topic and I'll pm you a reply in 24 hours. Ish.
 
John Nowak said:
Disclose.

Ignoring any ethical imperative to tell the truth over something this mind-boggling, the aliens can blow the secret out of the water if it every occurs to them to do so. Why deliberately put yourself in a position where at someone else's whim, you'll be exposed as a liar?
Click to expand...

Very good point.
Don't the aliens have any say in this? If they had good intentions, like the Vulcans, for example, they presumably would object to their attempts to welcome humanity into the galactic community being subverted by a power-hungry elite.
On the other hand, if they told the US president/ NASA/ Patrick Stewart or whoever, "Listen, don't tell anyone else we're here, because that will make it much easier for us to enslave you before most people know what's going on er..sorry...because humanity isn't ready yet (even though Patrick Stewart is), surely any leader or organisation in such a position would be deeply suspicious?
 
Bubba said:
OK Thanks.

Care to weigh in on the disclose or not disclose question in the OP?
.
Click to expand...

I was trying to suggest to you that the first two mentioned persons in my post will give you reasoned answers , as separately might Doctor Steven Greer --- ever a sane voice in an arena full of very disturbed individuals .In direct response to your question , my view is that the outcome of the Antarctic battles will determine what next steps can be realistically considered .The "hugeness " of full disclosure is almost beyond full appreciation .To admit to free energy and anti gravitic propulsion changes all of the planet and every inhabitant forever . It also means that governmental duplicity and the arrogance of government agencies like NASA will be clear to all . Social revolution will occur and blood will flow . It is important not to think that Disclosure is just about officially admitting UFO details and follow up work that has been hidden since at least the 1930's. Frankly , that aspect in isolation , is almost a mere detail .Regardless, the forces that have controlled matters have to be removed permanently: and whilst the Rothschild or Khazerian Empire may be tottering badly , this power elite will attempt to drag everything and everybody down with it rather than give up might , wealth and power .So let's wait for the imminent Black Swan Financial event and then see which power group emerges and what they are prepared to admit to and how they propose to deal with the human population .
 
jaydeehess said:
Is there a lack of persons on the internet claiming pretty much exactly what you outline in the OP?
.
Click to expand...

Malbec said:
Your best sources are David Wilcock and the two most important Secret Space Programme whistleblowers are Corey Goode and William Tompkinson . The latter debriefed over 1000 of the hand picked SS Nazi scientists who were taken into the US at the end of WW2 . I have enjoyed following the cutting edge factions involved in this narrative for many years and suspect that little will be resolved until the current battles that are pivotal to the Antarctic region are resolved . And if you don't know what I am talking about , I suggest you get down to some serious research and avoid the need to ask questions which are in large part being answered right now . But if you think there is anybody else on this chat site who has even an inkling of this subject matter , I can assure you the answer is a a 100% No .
Click to expand...
Thanks for confirming my case there Malbec.
 
So you decided to disclose presence of ET visitors...Now what?

.
OK, disclose....Now what?

May this thread pivot from that other thread: To disclose, or not

Pivot point:

Posted by Malbec View Post


Your best sources are.....
Click to expand...



Originally Posted by Bubba View Post


OK Thanks.

Care to weigh in on the disclose or not disclose question in the OP?
Click to expand...



Malbec said:
I was trying to suggest to you that the first two mentioned persons in my post will give you reasoned answers , as separately might Doctor Steven Greer --- ever a sane voice in an arena full of very disturbed individuals .In direct response to your question , my view is that the outcome of the Antarctic battles will determine what next steps can be realistically considered .The "hugeness " of full disclosure is almost beyond full appreciation .To admit to free energy and anti gravitic propulsion changes all of the planet and every inhabitant forever . It also means that governmental duplicity and the arrogance of government agencies like NASA will be clear to all . Social revolution will occur and blood will flow . It is important not to think that Disclosure is just about officially admitting UFO details and follow up work that has been hidden since at least the 1930's. Frankly , that aspect in isolation , is almost a mere detail .Regardless, the forces that have controlled matters have to be removed permanently: and whilst the Rothschild or Khazerian Empire may be tottering badly , this power elite will attempt to drag everything and everybody down with it rather than give up might , wealth and power .So let's wait for the imminent Black Swan Financial event and then see which power group emerges and what they are prepared to admit to and how they propose to deal with the human population .
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
.

...forward to this exploration...(surely the above suffices as springboard material.)

However, rather than primarily addressing that, how about a more generalized approach in this thread please as follows...



How would you best handle this disclosure challenge in a good way, to minimize the bad and maximize the good?

What issues around disclosure do you see?
Advantages?
Disadvantages?
Problems?
Surprises?

Note:
This is still fantasy or sci-fi ie a hypothetical exercise. (in case anyone missed that)

One condition (so far) being that the so called free energy technology thingamajig must be addressed.
It comes with your disclosure decision. It will now be part of the picture. It does everything our
current energy tech does. Details of how it works are not so important for now here.


There is still time BTW to back away from disclosing...Your call.
.
 
Last edited:
Malbec said:
I was trying to suggest to you that the first two mentioned persons in my post will give you reasoned answers , as separately might Doctor Steven Greer --- ever a sane voice in an arena full of very disturbed individuals .In direct response to your question , my view is that the outcome of the Antarctic battles will determine what next steps can be realistically considered .The "hugeness " of full disclosure is almost beyond full appreciation .To admit to free energy and anti gravitic propulsion changes all of the planet and every inhabitant forever . It also means that governmental duplicity and the arrogance of government agencies like NASA will be clear to all . Social revolution will occur and blood will flow . It is important not to think that Disclosure is just about officially admitting UFO details and follow up work that has been hidden since at least the 1930's. Frankly , that aspect in isolation , is almost a mere detail .Regardless, the forces that have controlled matters have to be removed permanently: and whilst the Rothschild or Khazerian Empire may be tottering badly , this power elite will attempt to drag everything and everybody down with it rather than give up might , wealth and power .So let's wait for the imminent Black Swan Financial event and then see which power group emerges and what they are prepared to admit to and how they propose to deal with the human population .
Click to expand...

....and we should believe this 'bucket of sloppy CT thinking' for what reason?
 
Malbec said:
Your best sources are David Wilcock and the two most important Secret Space Programme whistleblowers are Corey Goode and William Tompkinson . The latter debriefed over 1000 of the hand picked SS Nazi scientists who were taken into the US at the end of WW2 . I have enjoyed following the cutting edge factions involved in this narrative for many years and suspect that little will be resolved until the current battles that are pivotal to the Antarctic region are resolved . And if you don't know what I am talking about , I suggest you get down to some serious research and avoid the need to ask questions which are in large part being answered right now . But if you think there is anybody else on this chat site who has even an inkling of this subject matter , I can assure you the answer is a a 100% No .
Click to expand...

5 seconds of moderately-serious research reveals that his name is, in fact, William Tompkins.
I already know more than Malbec. Not that that's saying much.....:rolleyes:

In an attempt to steer this conspiratorial bilge somewhere towards the vicinity of the topic, I'd like to ask both Bubba and Malbec this question:

As the presence of ETs has now been revealed by these deluded nutcases fearless whistleblowers, what difference do you think this has made?
 
For years I've been saying I'd vote for any politician willing to assert the need to build an orbital network of solar powered death rays (solar collector satellites beaming energy to earth receivers located at shorelines for powering desalinization plants and powering grids in remote villages) to both bring peace and prosperity to earth but also allow us to defend ourselves from intruders.

With Trump in the mix I've abandoned my adherence to this plank.
 
Bubba said:
:thumbsup:


Yes, I noticed that too.

More interesting, very informative IMO, and sometimes entertaining.



.
Click to expand...

You were asking for feedback on your hypothetical situation and yet turn up your proverbial nose at the suggestions? Let me theoretically snatch your glasses off your face and break them across my knee. Now analyze that! :p
 
Oh I don't think I could eat anything that was smarter than we are.
 
The Atheist said:
Interesting hypothetical, and I'd let the cat out of the bag. Humans learning they aren't as special or clever as they thought wouldn't be a bad thing.

Much more interesting are the responses, however,especially those who are incapable of accepting a hypothetical posited for no reason other than fun, demanding to know what your agenda is. Fascinating.
Click to expand...


Agreed. Those that did participate were interestingly more numerous than anticipated. I woulda lost money on that.

Yes it is an interesting hypothetical. Applied widely it could generate info which could come in handy one day, unless we rule out the possibility.

Other benefits also come with everyone out in the open questioning it rationally together (since it can be ridiculed sometimes)...(there's another study topic).

Already was addressed somewhat by Brookings. I wonder if/what other studies there are, formally, by any gov/other organizations.

Imagine if almighty TVnews, announced the question, (instead of the 'alien' snickering they are paid for). It would be a 'thing' for a little while sparking some meaningful conversations among some people.

Maybe put it on one of those newshour viewer polls.....

"If your leaders knew for a fact we are being visited by ET in spacecraft, should it be disclosed to the public? Tune in to Newshour Friday for results !!"
.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom