This place is overflowing with kooks.

[Axiom_Blade]

Ditto, I was just noticing all the threads by new Kooks! Is Hell overpyroclasticly flowing? Sheesh, great work though JREF. They love the negative attention. It is nice to see y'all pick them apart. Nothing new though, I'm waiting to see, how crazy the next theory is. I mean...where do you go after Space Beams?

I'm waiting for somebody to claim that the towers were holograms.

 

[Pardalis]

Vigilant Guardian

A simulation of a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union' on North America is proof of a 9/11 conspiracy?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

A simulation of a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union' on North America is proof of a 9/11 conspiracy?

yes, and a soviet bomber attack is also a hijacking simulation

 

[Buckaroo]

With the bewildering number of contradictory troofer scenarios out there, and the widely varying degrees of their plausability, I find myself wondering -- which one does Morphology himself subscribe to? It might help the discussion to know...

 

[Oliver]

FCUK'em...
DT

I know it´s a littlebit late...

 

[Wizard]

A simulation of a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union' on North America is proof of a 9/11 conspiracy?

That was northern vigilance pardalis.

 

[Mercutio]

it would be equally...retarded...to look at the stream of false flag operations and simply assume that this was another.”

I’m aware of Hume’s problem with induction. Thing is, when people see the sun rising every morning they tend to assume a sort of pattern at work. If I gaze at the horizon before day break and witness a general brightening effect I may very well conclude that the sun is about to rise. So it is with false flag operations and 911. All the indicators are there.

"All the indicators" being...?

Your sunrise analogy works better if you can present a recognizable pattern. Your "stream of false flag operations" is more of an inconsistant drip, when held to history's timeline. Mightn't a better candidate for "sunrise" be the steady stream of actual hostilities by one group against another? As you say, "all the indicators are there."

What is missing is the specific evidence, the specific indicators, that are consistent with "false flag" but not with actual war or terrorism. Where is that evidence?

 

[Pardalis]

That was northern vigilance pardalis.

Not what is says here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Guardian

The Vigilant Guardian war game was discussed in chapter 1, footnote 116 of the 9/11 Commission Report:

"On 9/11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise, Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union.

 

[Wizard]

‘‘Operation Vigilant Guardian,’’ a fourth drill, simulated hijacked planes.
During this event, Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, a NORAD control and warning
officer, took the call from the Boston Center warning that it was tracking a
hijacked airliner. Her first words were, ‘‘It must be part of the exercise’’
(Seely, 2002).

Thats from:

http://physics911.net/jacobs.pdf

Its a 23 page well sourced essay on the war games. You might want to read it before betraying your ignorance again​

​

​

 

[defaultdotxbe]

That was northern vigilance pardalis.

no, that was vigilant guardian

northern vigilance was a deployment of fighters and bombers to alaska and northern canada to monitor a russian excercise

 

[defaultdotxbe]

Thats from:​

http://physics911.net/jacobs.pdf​

Its a 23 page well sourced essay on the war games. You might want to read it before betraying your ignorance again​

if his essay is well sourced why cant you cite the actual source instead of the essay itself?

ETA: here it is, is it really that difficult?
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2002/newhousenews012502.html

 

[apathoid]

That was northern vigilance pardalis.

Vigilant Guardian, the semiannual NORAD exercise that had been running in conjunction with Global Guardian for several days and which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union. Vigilant Guardian is a Command Post Exercise (CPX), meaning it is conducted in offices and with computers, but without actual planes in the air. The exercise involves all NORAD command levels.[3] Out of a range of scenarios being run on September 11, 2001, one was a "traditional" simulated hijacking.[4] According to General Eberhart, after the first attack, "it took about 30 seconds" to make the adjustment to the real-world situation.[5] Because of an increased number of staff, the exercise would prove to be an enabler of rapid military response for NORAD and its NEADS component, as senior officials who were manning NORAD command centers throughout the U.S., were available to make rapid decisions.[6]

http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-military-exercises-scheduled-for-september-11-2001

No mention of drones, much less hijacked airliner drones......

 

[Zep]

Nothing new though, I'm waiting to see, how crazy the next theory is. I mean...where do you go after Space Beams?

Lessee...

Mind control?

Six thousand year old Earth ACTUALLY HAPPENED??!!1!!

Sylvia Browne really can see dead people? (And not just while she is showering...)

Six billion year old gigantor aliens get trapped in a volcano, and they are now taking over peoples' bodies and can only be removed by applying two AA cells, some cheap electronic gizmos and heaps of money? Ably assisted by some moronic flunky jumping on a couch while being interviewed on TV?

OMG!! It's all TRUE!

 

[Gravy]

Vigilant Guardian

And at what time did Vigilant Guardian begin for NEADS on 9/11?

(cue Jeopardy theme music)

 

[beachnut]

I’m sorry kids, but this place resembles a society of straight-thinking skeptics like Paris Hilton resembles virginity.

Let me guess:

You have to be seriously…retarded .... are completely and utterly ridiculous.

I’m sorry...

I... a wicked pseudo-intellectual buffoonery....

... you would piss on the graves of 911 families ....

Time to grow up, kids.

You seem to have the same IQ as PH

Go ahead guess, it looks like that is the best you can do, guess.

I think you are also as you say others are. Thank you

You should be sorry, nice post of zero facts. good job

I agree you are!

No you are the one being disrespectful! Your lack of facts prove you are the one.

Let me guess your IQ is under 80 when it comes to physics and real rational thought.

You watch Alex Jones and think he has good ideas!

That should sum up you intellectual expertise. Did I miss anything fact man.

 

[Wizard]

http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-military-exercises-scheduled-for-september-11-2001

No mention of drones, much less hijacked airliner drones......

But a hijacjing drill was being run on that day which is the question Gravy was asking

 

[JFM]

"VIGILANT GUARDIAN

The exercise involves all HQ NORAD levels of command and is designed to exercise most aspects of the NORAD mission. One VG is scheduled each year and the length will vary depending on the exercise scenario and objectives."

 

[Dog Town]

Because of an increased number of staff, the exercise would prove to be an enabler of rapid military response for NORAD and its NEADS component, as senior officials who were manning NORAD command centers throughout the U.S., were available to make rapid decisions.

Such a surprise, CT'ers always miss this! Hmm...

 

[defaultdotxbe]

now i see, this is actually a misrepresentation of mr. seely's article

‘‘Operation Vigilant Guardian,’’ a fourth drill, simulated hijacked planes.
During this event, Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, a NORAD control and warning
officer, took the call from the Boston Center warning that it was tracking a
hijacked airliner. Her first words were, ‘‘It must be part of the exercise’’
(Seely, 2002).

here is what seel;y had to say about vigilant guardian:

Sept. 11 was Day II of "Vigilant Guardian," an exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts nationwide. The simulation would run all week, and Deskins, starting her 12-hour shift in the Operations Center as the NORAD unit's airborne control and warning officer, might find herself on the spot.

here is the part on the hijacked planes:

At 8:40, Deskins noticed senior technician Jeremy Powell waving his hand. Boston Center was on the line, he said. It had a hijacked airplane.

"It must be part of the exercise," Deskins thought.

At first, everybody did. Then Deskins saw the glowing direct phone line to the Federal Aviation Administration.

the article seems to indicate they made the transition from simulation to real world in under a minute

 

[defaultdotxbe]

But a hijacjing drill was being run on that day which is the question Gravy was asking

then name the drill

its not vigilant guardian
its not northern vigilance