This place is overflowing with kooks.

oliver has a sock at LC
oliver is a JREFer

therefore, in CT-world, all JREFers have socks at LC and all LC members should be allowed socks at JREF

painting thousands of forum members with the same brush, classic CTer

Other JREFers have them aswell. Stop complaining about socks then sending oliver over to LC on his latest wind up mission
 
Need I remind you that Oliver has had his 20th sock puppet banned from LC and at once stage he was the number 1 poster on the board.

Big difference. Oliver is honest about it. You troofer kooks who come here with your multiple socks are not.

There are numerous other JREFers with sock puppets at LC.

There may be a few, sure. Again, there's a big difference, though. At the loosewiththetruth forum, anyone who doesn't toe the troofer line is banned outright. Here, you only get banned for breaking the rules.
 
Other JREFers have them aswell. Stop complaining about socks then sending oliver over to LC on his latest wind up mission
who else has them? are they the same ones who accuse you of being pdoh here? whos "sending" oliver over there?
 
The system is not just, therefore "truthers" oppose the system.. Some day, we hope and expect, the shills will go the way of the French Revolution. Not pretty, but necessary :)

Perhaps a few heads rolling round, but who's counting?

Bring it on.

Yeah.... I think the day after the "glorious revolution" you'll wake up to find you've killed all the doctors, engineers, and scientists. And be left with a group of college dropouts, and liberal arts PhDs in the scholars for 911truth movement, along with some militant white neo nazis and some fundamental muslim fantatics. I look forward to seeing how you'll, do, er, anything.
 
Q. for Wizard

Wizard,

Hey I have an honest question for you.

You seem like a pretty reasonable bloke.

Do you HONESTLY believe some big dang fangled conspiracy happened with 911 ?

I am ok if you say well .. “it pretty much went down like they say.. but I think the Govt tried to cover stuff up or tried to cover their asses for being incompetent”…

Or do you think the Govt ORGANISED and executed 911 ?
 
So why did you respond to my post if it wasn't directed at you?

Why post your beef with somebody who posts on this forum on the open forum if you was not inviting discussion ?

If you have a beef with somebody who openly admits he mocks you, why have you come here as a LC sock ? To even the score , maybe?

Are you here to defend the honour of LC ? So you come as a sneaky sock ? You dare not say who you are, for fear of what exactly ?
 
I don't understand why anybody is even acknowledging Morphology. He obviously is not here to present facts, evidence, or any other relevant data in support of an argument or claim. He is simply here to cause a disturbance.

Well, I'm only a semi-professional Internet psychologist (i.e. I accept donations through PayPal), but in my semi-professional opinion, Morphy is definitely trolling, but he's also definitely a conspiracy nut, so coming here to troll is very likely a desperate cry for help. He's taunting you about "thinking outside the box", but that may be a clue: he may well be getting pretty scared floating around out there without a rational tether, and is desperately hoping someone can pull him back in the box. If so, I believe everyone should continue to encourage him to try to put his delusions and scattered paranoid inferences in the form of logical arguments so that he can examine the logic for himself.
 
Last edited:
Other JREFers have them aswell. Stop complaining about socks then sending oliver over to LC on his latest wind up mission

I love you, too.
love002.gif
 
Wizard,

Hey I have an honest question for you.

You seem like a pretty reasonable bloke.

Do you HONESTLY believe some big dang fangled conspiracy happened with 911 ?

I am ok if you say well .. “it pretty much went down like they say.. but I think the Govt tried to cover stuff up or tried to cover their asses for being incompetent”…

Or do you think the Govt ORGANISED and executed 911 ?

I genuinely seek answers. As you can see in the timothy McVeigh thread, when I was presented with information about the bombs I admitted my mistake.

I find the whole 9/11 scenario suspicious and it may well be argument from incredulity but that's how it is
 
Why post your beef with somebody who posts on this forum on the open forum if you was not inviting discussion ?

If you have a beef with somebody who openly admits he mocks you, why have you come here as a LC sock ? To even the score , maybe?

Are you here to defend the honour of LC ? So you come as a sneaky sock ? You dare not say who you are, for fear of what exactly ?

I am not a sock. I don't have other accounts here. Sure, I am not using my LC username but I don't have to.
 
I genuinely seek answers. As you can see in the timothy McVeigh thread, when I was presented with information about the bombs I admitted my mistake.

I find the whole 9/11 scenario suspicious and it may well be argument from incredulity but that's how it is


Fair enough Wiz.. we are all “suspicious”.. I sure am anyway.

Most of 911 is a bit of a “no-brainer” though.

The USE of 911 (after the fact) to push other inane Govt agenda’s (like the invasion of Iraq) is reprehensible but the Govt actually being involved with 911 is a bit ludicrous !
 
I genuinely seek answers. As you can see in the timothy McVeigh thread, when I was presented with information about the bombs I admitted my mistake.

I find the whole 9/11 scenario suspicious and it may well be argument from incredulity but that's how it is

You site lies from PrisonPlanet and post them as discussion? Find some facts.

You do not seek answers you present lies from Alex Jones; Tell the true; you think the official story is falling apart and being exposed.

Just an answer!
 
I'd give odds that he is a card-carrying member of the loosewiththetruth forum. One with lots of :socks: in fact.

The influx of cloned troofer kooks here recently is in direct correlation to the meltdown of the loosewiththetruth forum, which has been practically tomb-like ever since it re-opened. The poor little troofers are just bored over there so they come here to feed their hundreds-of-posts-per-day habit, and to tell themselves how very, very clever they are.

Pretty sad, really.

I was thinking about posting something along those lines, but as usual you have put it much more eloquently than I was going to.

May I suggest that the term for these looosers should be called nonjas?


I genuinely seek answers.

But have you found any answers? (If so, please tell us in a new thread.) Or are you still waiting for one which you will then claim proves the whole 'inside job'?

As you can see in the timothy McVeigh thread, when I was presented with information about the bombs I admitted my mistake.

I find the whole 9/11 scenario suspicious and it may well be argument from incredulity but that's how it is

Questions are not evidence. I do find that you are refreshingly honest compared to almost all the twoofers I've seen. But in comparison to non-CTists, you fall too far short. You still seem to be arguing with confirmation bias. Can't you cancel out your incredulity by acknowledging your lack of evidence for an inside job?
 
Other JREFers have them aswell. Stop complaining about socks then sending oliver over to LC on his latest wind up mission
1) We don't have any control over what Oliver does, or does not do; and only our mods have can take action against something he does on the JREF forums.

2) LCF rules regarding socks
The Loose Change Forums are a place for the intelligent, respectful exchange of ideas.

Certain theories perceived as extreme and divisive will be moderated at the discretion of the administration.

This is a privately owned forum and the administration reserves the right to restrict the participation of any user that is deemed disruptive for any reason.

Please take a minute to read the Invision rules which we are also subject to in detail.

Thank you.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?act=boardrules

JREF rules regarding socks
7. You may only have one membership account. Multiple accounts (sock puppets) are not permitted.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25744
 

Back
Top Bottom