This place is overflowing with kooks.

But a hijacjing drill was being run on that day which is the question Gravy was asking
I repeat: at what time did Vigilant Guardian begin for NEADS on 9/11?

Jeopardy theme music is running.
 
And at what time did Vigilant Guardian begin for NEADS on 9/11?

(cue Jeopardy theme music)

30 seconds after the first hijack was reported to them.

Now, my question is if they were running this drill and they were extra staffed and had anticipated such a scenario why was the response not faster?
 
30 seconds after the first hijack was reported to them.

Now, my question is if they were running this drill and they were extra staffed and had anticipated such a scenario why was the response not faster?
faster compared to what?

BTW vigilant guardian was not a hijacking scenario
 
30 seconds after the first hijack was reported to them.

Now, my question is if they were running this drill and they were extra staffed and had anticipated such a scenario why was the response not faster?

The response -by your reasoning- must have been faster than light and time since you think they shot down UA93.
 
Morph:

You take that long to reply, and all you give is a sales pitch for paranoia.

You really think you are gonna come in here, and convince skeptics to become paranoid?

Bring up one aspect of 9/11 that proves it was an inside job, in your opinion....just one. Then try to back it up with hard facts.

No better yet, for your own sake, take the advice of 28K...just back away from the forum...now while you have the chance.

TAM
 
30 seconds after the first hijack was reported to them.

Now, my question is if they were running this drill and they were extra staffed and had anticipated such a scenario why was the response not faster?
Um, no.

Vigilant Guardian was scheduled to begin at 9:00 EST. It had not begun when the first hijacking was reported. Major Nasypany of NEADS was out for a walk when he got word of the hijacking. His first thought was "Somebody started the exercise early." Major Nasypany helped to design the one and only hijacking drill – not involving actual aircraft – that was to be run later that day. You actually think that they got word of the real world hijacking and then decided to hold their exercises anyway?

Are you that naive, Wizard?
 
Last edited:
Um, no.

Vigilant Guardian was scheduled to begin at 9:00 EST. It had not begun when the first hijacking was reported. Major Nasypany of NEADS was out for a walk when he got word of the hijacking. His first thought was "Somebody started the exercise early." Major Naspany helped to design the one and only hijacking drill – not involving actual aircraft – that was to be run later that day. You actually think that they got word of the real world hijacking and then decided to hold their exercises anyway?

Are you that naive, Wizard?

I was being flippant but the point is that these drills are said to have confused responders within the airforce
 
They had a long time to get 93.

How much time, exactly? How much time passed between NEADS first notification that airliners were being hijacked and UA93 crashing in PA?

More time than the Payne Stewart intercept?
 
Dog town have you seen how many JREFers are on the LC boards?

Is that counting actual JREFers, or are you including all the people they accuse of being JREFers, just because they fail to toe the CTist line?
 
Is that counting actual JREFers, or are you including all the people they accuse of being JREFers, just because they fail to toe the CTist line?
actually a lot those seem to come here to see what the hubub is about and become regular posters, lol
 
I was being flippant but the point is that these drills are said to have confused responders within the airforce
You made a claim. You were wrong. Now you have made another claim. You are wrong about that. Any doubt about the reality of the hijacking was cleared up within the first few seconds with the answer to the question "Is this real world or exercise?" Since "these drills" hadn't started for NEADS, it was really very simple to get on the right page.

Agreed, Wizard?

If so, then please retract your statement.

If not, then present your evidence to the contrary. You will be the first to do so.

Is that a reasonable proposition, Wizard?
 

Back
Top Bottom