You compare resistance in m/s^2 (an acceleration) to space wind in Newton (a force).
No before both values was calculated in Newton.
Now we can compare the accelerations due to resistance and space wind and see that they do not equalize - they are close".
Done > Now we can compare the forces due to resistance and space wind with each other, and see that the two "forces"
almost equalizes.
The high school student would look at (1-y) and see that there are no units beacuse it divides v by c and the rest is numbers.
The high school student would look at your values and see that there are units.
They would immediately know that there is something missing from your equation. Only an pre-high school student would think that an equation that has no units of measurement can produce numbers that have units of measurement.
So lets double check what you are doing
What is the actual equation that you use to calculate resistance?
If you are using (1-y) then you are doing something quite idiotic.
No I do not agree to that.
1.) The basic of the equation is resistance
2.) Secondary consequences are gradually mass and KE increase. But this are consequences due to resistance against motion.
3.) The values you enters in the equation is :
velocity, and this is also the basic what
must “come out”.
4.) You can rather put it the other way around and ask what has gradually KE and M to do with deceleration / resistance, and why are these values proportional with resistance against motion ?
Notice the resulyt is a "transformation factor" that propotional MUST reflect both - KE + M + (minus) v.
Also try to undertand what really happens.
What happens when you put matter into motion?
What you really are doing is that you put elementary particles into motion. What would happen when you would through a tornado through space let’s sat with 10.000 km/h ?
It would spin like a football and suck more air right ?
It’s the same that happens with the elementary particles if speed increases, - we say the inner KE increases. Translated to the "human mind" it means that the small tornadoes (
particles) sucks (contracts) more space = proportional more KE and proportional more M because M is contracted space. - (Also this phenomana is really a broad hint to understand the nature of gravity.)
This all happens because of ”negative velocity” (or resistances) against motion // deceleration.
It's a closed process. You really
do not get velocity out, but racther it's allready inside the process. That why I used the expression "neative velocity".
So te deceleration
ARE the transformation factor (1-y) – ( and it do remember what it really is = deceleration // m/s^2) .
5.)
If you do not agree let the let the math genius crack the fact that you also
must have deceleration. And should I be arong telle me the correct value ???
According to you newest calculations, all the inner planets, and Earth, Mars and Jupiter are on the way outwards. Are you sure you should not do the calculations one more time?
A very cold winter day, when I do not know what to do, yes MAYBE.
1.)As I wrote it makes really no sence because we do first need to test the “centrifugal force” – A such test can take decades. It's not everyday we launch space probes. On the other hand it can happen fast if e.g: NASA want especially to sent out probes only to test this.
2.)Regarding Jupiter. KE is also used to maintain the resistances against rotation, to transmit KE to the many moons, and the orbit centricity is different from planet to planet. – And my data is only rough.
3.)I think before anyone want to start to figure all these complications we need a clearer picture e.g: measurement in space, and here is the space “compass” (triangulating device from DTU) a invaluable step forward, that certainly will change our understanding of the two unknown forces.
.
and back on the track. 
