The Truthers Prepare For President Obama....

[Corsair 115]

Thankfully, also, Ron Paul's followers are trying to have a lasting influence on American politics, after having faced up to the fact that Paul will not be the next President of the US.

Yes, Ron Paul, who believes in the "NAFTA superhighway" and "North American Union" conspiracy nonsense.

 

[eromitlab]

Hey, thelonebedouin, a search on reddit for "oreobama" turns up 13 results.
http://www.reddit.com/search?q=oreobama&x=0&y=0
All 13 submissions come from the same user, who is a believer in 9/11 troof (and every other wackadoo conspiracy that Alex Jones pushes) and is editorializing the race-baiting term "Oreobama" into headlines independently. Those that upvote the submissions don't stop to comment about the racism present in the headline.
So, it all depends on where you look. Or how you look. Considering that loosechangeforums.com isn't actually a website in and of itself and that it simply redirects to LCF on zetaboards.com, you won't find much of anything there if you format your google search correctly.
Here's an example of a properly formatted google search for a keyword on a particular website:
Your search - inside job site:loosechangeforums.com - did not match any documents.
(And even if you format your loosechangeforum google searches the way you did, the same search as the one directly above still yields no results.)

 

[JihadJane]

Which part of "every" did you not follow?

Can you name one who didn't?

Thanks for giving so many examples of virulent anti-Americans who wanted to pretend AQ were innocent.

You, cause you made it up. Its not what he said, its what you wanted him to say. That you ignore the post that shows you this gave it away.

No, you are creating your own reality again and believing it to be real! Dangerous habit.

I am not a "virulent anti-American".

At first, I didn't notice your post. Then, when I did, I was knocked unconscious buy a flying goalpost.

I'm happy to let others judge how accurately I reported what bin Laden said, without any further input from me.

 

[Dr Adequate]

I never accused anyone of calling Obama an "Uncle Tom". I posted the links to show that debunkers are talking about these subjects ...

And why did you wish to show that we were "talking about these subjects?" Was it because you wished to imply a falsehood without technically lying?

Yes, I have mentioned both Barack Obama and Uncle Tom Cobely of "Widecombe Fair" fame in the same thread, indeed the same post. And your point is?

To Lurkers:

Why did Dr Adequate question my sources but not Parky's sourceless claims? If he is ok with lying about those who disagree with him or not questioning others who lie, why should we believe anything he says?

I did question parky's claim, to the extent that I used google to verify that it was true.

You could have done the same instead of screaming at him that he was a liar, but that wouldn't have been as much fun for you.

 

[funk de fino]

No, you are creating your own reality again and believing it to be real! Dangerous habit.

I am not a "virulent anti-American".

At first, I didn't notice your post. Then, when I did, I was knocked unconscious buy a flying goalpost.

I'm happy to let others judge how accurately I reported what bin Laden said, without any further input from me.

You are English impaired then, because I showed you the quotes which do not say what you say he did.

Go back and read them again.

when he denied involvement, he pointed to a government within a government in the US as a likely place to find the perpetrators.

The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it.

Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.

You are conflicting the two quotes, from different parts of the interview, into one, to try and say something Bin Laden did not say.

As dishonest and wrong as usual.

ETA - buy a flying goalpost? Too ironic after the 7/7 thread JJ

 

[Dave Rogers]

I guess for Truthers the great thing about Google is that it abolishes context automatically, thus saving your precious reserves of stupid for more important tasks.

Thanks, Dr. A. It's about time I had a new signature.

Dave

 

[Tippit]

And if the twoofers are talking about PNAC then no worry because there is no more PNAC. Neocons like Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Dick Cheney are retired well maybe Paul Wolfowitz still speaks in universities. It seems like the PNAC wasn"t that powerful after all.

Well, Wolfowitz had a stint with the World Bank until recently. I'm not sure that qualifies as "retired". I think it's pretty inaccurate to say they were not powerful, unless you have some alternate definition of powerful that I'm not aware of.

 

[Travis]

I'm curious as to who is and who isn't considered a Debunker.

 

[JihadJane]

You are conflicting the two quotes, from different parts of the interview, into one, to try and say something Bin Laden did not say.

I did not quote bin Laden. I cannot see any difference between what I said he said and the quotes you have helpfully provided, so cannot help you feel better. Sorry.

 

[Wildy]

I thought we figured out on page one that the US government is controlled by Sid Meyer?

 

[twinstead]

Jihadjane did I miss where you gave your opinion on OBL's subsequent admissions of guilt?

 

[JihadJane]

Jihadjane did I miss where you gave your opinion on OBL's subsequent admissions of guilt?

No, don't worry.

I haven't expressed an opinion on either his denials or his admissions.

 

[funk de fino]

I did not quote bin Laden. I cannot see any difference between what I said he said and the quotes you have helpfully provided, so cannot help you feel better. Sorry.

Impaired English like I said then. No wonder you are a truther who makes incorrect claims so much. Try retaking your english exams, it may help you.

 

[funk de fino]

No, don't worry.

I haven't expressed an opinion on either his denials or his admissions.

Do you think it is interesting that he and senior AQ members admitted it so many times?

 

[JihadJane]

Do you think it is interesting that he and senior AQ members admitted it so many times?

Why don't you start a thread on this topic if it interests you?

 

[funk de fino]

Why don't you start a thread on this topic if it interests you?

No point if you continue to show a poor grasp of the written word.

You would probably just run away again when shown to be incorrect.

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

Hey, thelonebedouin, a search on reddit for "oreobama" turns up 13 results.
http://www.reddit.com/search?q=oreobama&x=0&y=0
All 13 submissions come from the same user, who is a believer in 9/11 troof (and every other wackadoo conspiracy that Alex Jones pushes) and is editorializing the race-baiting term "Oreobama" into headlines independently. Those that upvote the submissions don't stop to comment about the racism present in the headline.

So one person calling Obama "Oreobama" on an obscure non-911 truth oriented website means that many truthers regularly do this?

So, it all depends on where you look. Or how you look. Considering that loosechangeforums.com isn't actually a website in and of itself and that it simply redirects to LCF on zetaboards.com, you won't find much of anything there if you format your google search correctly.
Here's an example of a properly formatted google search for a keyword on a particular website:
Your search - inside job site:loosechangeforums.com - did not match any documents.
(And even if you format your loosechangeforum google searches the way you did, the same search as the one directly above still yields no results.)

LooseChange Forums- 0 Hits
LooseChange Forums Obama and Uncle Tom- 0 Hits

The largest "truther" forum has 0 hits and the results for these racist terms are just as low for the 9/11 blogosphere (1 hit in defence of Obama). If you defend these bunk claims about Truthers, what other bunk claims are you defending?

 

[Travis]

The irony is that if we banned everyone who called Obama an Oreo we'd be labeled as Left Wing PC Gatekeepers.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

 

[Dr Adequate]

LooseChange Forums- 0 Hits
LooseChange Forums Obama and Uncle Tom- 0 Hits

Your methodology was debunked in the very post you're ostensibly replying to.

You need to move on to a different form of deceit: if possible one slightly less transparent, as this makes it more interesting for us.

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

Your methodology was debunked in the very post you're ostensibly replying to.

You need to move on to a different form of deceit: if possible one slightly less transparent, as this makes it more interesting for us.

Wrong- I'm using eromitlab's method.
Lurkers, notice how assuming "loosechangeforums.com" was the root url of the site equals "deceit", while posting a clearly wrong claim about truthers with no sources is not only unchallenged, but defended.
This is the kind of "critical thinking" the JREF cultivates- i.e. the use of rhetorical devices, ridicule, and selective criticism to support the status quo's ideology.