The Truthers Prepare For President Obama....

JihadJane said:
However,on this thread, I was sayin no more than that it is interesting that, when he denied involvement, he pointed to a government within a government in the US as a likely place to find the perpetrators.
Click to expand...
Well of course he did. So did every other virulent anti-American who wanted to pretend AQ were innocent.
 
parky76 said:
I expect 9-11 conspiracy believer's critisism of Obama will take a more and more racist tone as time goes on. They already regularly call him an "Uncle Tom" and an "Oreo". I dont expect the N word will be far behind.
Click to expand...
Google Search: Loosechangeforums.com Obama and Oreo: 0 Hits
Google Search: Loosechangeforums.com Obama and Uncle Tom- O Hits
Google Search: 911blogger.com Obama and Oreo- 1 Hit Only Mentioning a Discussion by Fox's Sean Hannity
Google Search: 911blogger.com- 1 Hit Criticising those Who Call Obama Uncle Tom
Google Search: JREF Obama and Uncle Tom- 10 Hits Including "Uncle Barack's Cabin"
Google Search: Jref Obama and Oreo- 30 Hits- ALL THOSE WHO CALL OBAMA "Oreo" ARE "DEBUNKERS"

For the Lurkers:
Parky76 is a blatant liar- he will claim 9/11 Skeptics are murderers, misogynists, racists, etc. In no case will he cite a source. Please disregard any claim he makes about truthers. In the case that a particular claim by Parky is not challenged by so-called "Critical Thinkers/Debunkers", ask yourself whether their primary purpose is to defend the truth, or to smear Truthers.*

*Thank you Gravy for not doing this.
 
Frankly, any rational person with eyes and some time to spend on internet forums can make up their own minds about what truthers are like. We don't need Parky76 to 'smear' them.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Google Search: JREF Obama and Uncle Tom- 10 Hits Including "Uncle Barack's Cabin"
Click to expand...
Which, as you can see by following the link, is a discussion of a headline in a German magazine.

I notice that I am one of the miscreants who called Obama an Uncle Tom. Oh, wait, I didn't ...

Dr Adequate said:
Two Cheers For Democracy

Being a celebration of the 2008 primary season.

More specifically, of the fact that it has ended.

There was Huckabee, Romney, John Edwards, McCain,
and Barack Obama (don't call him "Hussein"!);
Giuliani, unfairly lampooned by the press
for his habit of wearing a wig and a dress;

and Hillary Clinton, and Gravel, and Dodd,
and Richardson, Thompson and someone called Paul
with political theories that struck me as odd;
and old Uncle Tom Cobley and all.

<snip>
Click to expand...
What I actually did was use the two phrases in the same thread.

I guess for Truthers the great thing about Google is that it abolishes context automatically, thus saving your precious reserves of stupid for more important tasks. But posting the link was a mistake on your part, it makes it easier for people to find out how dumb and dishonest your arguments are. Not that that was ever difficult.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Google Search: Loosechangeforums.com Obama and Oreo: 0 Hits
Google Search: Loosechangeforums.com Obama and Uncle Tom- O Hits
Google Search: 911blogger.com Obama and Oreo- 1 Hit Only Mentioning a Discussion by Fox's Sean Hannity
Google Search: 911blogger.com- 1 Hit Criticising those Who Call Obama Uncle Tom
Google Search: JREF Obama and Uncle Tom- 10 Hits Including "Uncle Barack's Cabin"
Google Search: Jref Obama and Oreo- 30 Hits- ALL THOSE WHO CALL OBAMA "Oreo" ARE "DEBUNKERS"

For the Lurkers:
Parky76 is a blatant liar- he will claim 9/11 Skeptics are murderers, misogynists, racists, etc. In no case will he cite a source. Please disregard any claim he makes about truthers. In the case that a particular claim by Parky is not challenged by so-called "Critical Thinkers/Debunkers", ask yourself whether their primary purpose is to defend the truth, or to smear Truthers.*

*Thank you Gravy for not doing this.
Click to expand...

Do you mind pointing out even one debunker who calls Obama an oreo in your google research?
 
They will say that Obama works for the NWO because Jay Rockefeller supports Obama.
 
Dr Adequate said:
Which, as you can see by following the link, is a discussion of a headline in a German magazine.

I notice that I am one of the miscreants who called Obama an Uncle Tom. Oh, wait, I didn't ...
Click to expand...

I never accused anyone of calling Obama an "Uncle Tom". I posted the links to show that debunkers are talking about these subjects, not truthers.

To Lurkers:

Why did Dr Adequate question my sources but not Parky's sourceless claims? If he is ok with lying about those who disagree with him or not questioning others who lie, why should we believe anything he says?
 
TexasJack said:
Steverino is not a debunker.
Click to expand...
Yes he is.

steverino said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Craig_Roberts

Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false... Since the damning incontrovertible fact has not been investigated, speculation and “conspiracy theories” have filled the void. :boggled:

To offer a solution to the Middle East crisis, one would certainly have to navigate around this guy's outlook.
Click to expand...
He makes it clear that he disagrees with Roberts that the official explanation of the collapse is false. Therefore he is an OCTist/"Debunker".
 
Dr Adequate said:
That would be like begging bears to **** in the woods.

Here's a little charmer commenting on PrisonPlanet:
Why is a middle eastern even in the AMERICAN goverment,nun the less a presidential hopefull.The goverment is to blame for 9/11 and everything else wrong in this country and us real AMERICANS have to take it in the wazzu everyday and cant do nothing about it.We get flooded with these foriegners coming over starting religouse contriversy and refusing to live the AMERICAN way,getiing everything handed to them and then they bitch about us,they need to go back where they came from and shut up.
​
Click to expand...


http://xkcd.com/84/
 
Not believing 9/11 was an inside job does not make you a debunker, it makes you a non-truther. A debunker is someone like Mark Roberts or Ron Wieck who actively challenges the truther crapola. Not drinking the kool aid is not the same as debunking.
 
Last edited:
TheLoneBedouin said:
Yes he is.


He makes it clear that he disagrees with Roberts that the official explanation of the collapse is false. Therefore he is an OCTist/"Debunker".
Click to expand...

Oh I see, your definition of a debunker is anyone who merely states that they disagree with 911 nuttery:rolleyes: Well that would be about 95% of the population. Do you have anybody that actually posts on the conspiracy forums here and does actual debunking?
 
TexasJack said:
Oh I see, your definition of a debunker is anyone who merely states that they disagree with 911 nuttery:rolleyes: Well that would be about 95% of the population. Do you have anybody that actually posts on the conspiracy forums here and does actual debunking?
Click to expand...
No, there is no debunking, hence the quotes.*

*While in the past, JREF has been useful in debunking certain falsehoods about 9/11, the level of discussion has now degenerated into "Everything's been debunked you stupid truther". Now self-proclaimed "debunkers", such as Parky76, post obvious nonsense that can itself be debunked with a simple google search.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
No, there is no debunking, hence the quotes.*

*While in the past, JREF has been useful in debunking certain falsehoods about 9/11, the level of discussion has now degenerated into "Everything's been debunked you stupid truther". Now self-proclaimed "debunkers", such as Parky76, post obvious nonsense that can itself be debunked with a simple google search.
Click to expand...

So you admit you can't find one debunker on this forum that calls Obama an oreo. So you admit that your research is deficient. Thank You for demonstrating how truthers do such horrible investigating.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
No, there is no debunking, hence the quotes.*

*While in the past, JREF has been useful in debunking certain falsehoods about 9/11, the level of discussion has now degenerated into "Everything's been debunked you stupid truther". Now self-proclaimed "debunkers", such as Parky76, post obvious nonsense that can itself be debunked with a simple google search.
Click to expand...

"Obvious nonsense that can itself be debunked" = Hyperbole not at all relevant to the events of 9/11.

Way to break open the case, fact finder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom