The Truthers Prepare For President Obama....

Lame excuses!

I cant believe you managed to up the irony from your earlier post. Well done.

When should I start another thread? Almost immediately? Or do you want me to start one in 7 days? Same thing eh?

And also, I did not say you quoted UBL, I said you conflated his two quotes to say something he did not say. English impaired again?

You need to up your game JJ.
 
Your methodology was debunked in the very post you're ostensibly replying to.

You need to move on to a different form of deceit: if possible one slightly less transparent, as this makes it more interesting for us.

If it's so transparent that I can debunk it with ease, it's pretty damn transparent.

Hey, TLB, let's have a look at what else returns 0 results when loosechangeforums is searched on Google, using your formatting.

World Trade Center

Pentagon

Dylan Avery

And the kicker...
Loose Change
(But to be fair, if you add .com to loosechangeforums in this one, you get one result. Guess what it is. Go on, guess.)
 
Last edited:
If it's so transparent that I can debunk it with ease, it's pretty damn transparent.

Hey, TLB, let's have a look at what else returns 0 results when loosechangeforums is searched on Google, using your formatting.

World Trade Center

Pentagon

Dylan Avery

And the kicker...
Loose Change
(But to be fair, if you add .com to loosechangeforums in this one, you get one result. Guess what it is. Go on, guess.)
:covereyes That emoticon is the closest thing I have to a facepalm.
Dr Adequate and Eromitlab, please check the url in the hyperlink- again, I use Eromitlab's method.
 
I have a method now? Oh, cool.

btw, I checked your hyperlink. The most recent one, I presume. It doesn't go anywhere. Do you want to know why? This is the web address it points to.
http://obama + "uncle tom" site:http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/
 
Last edited:
And also, I did not say you quoted UBL, I said you conflated his two quotes to say something he did not say. English impaired again?

Fail again

You said:

"You are conflicting the two quotes, from different parts of the interview, into one, to try and say something Bin Laden did not say."

(My bold)
 
You said:

"You are conflicting the two quotes, from different parts of the interview, into one, to try and say something Bin Laden did not say."

(My bold)

And also, I did not say you quoted UBL, I said you conflated his two quotes to say something he did not say. English impaired again?

I have not said you quoted him I said you conflated or conflicted two different quotes to attempt to say he said something he did not.

My bolded.
 
Wrong- I'm using eromitlab's method.
Lurkers, notice how assuming "loosechangeforums.com" was the root url of the site equals "deceit", while posting a clearly wrong claim about truthers with no sources is not only unchallenged, but defended.
This is the kind of "critical thinking" the JREF cultivates- i.e. the use of rhetorical devices, ridicule, and selective criticism to support the status quo's ideology.
I don't think you've been following this thread.

:covereyes That emoticon is the closest thing I have to a facepalm.
Dr Adequate and Eromitlab, please check the url in the hyperlink- again, I use Eromitlab's method.
I'm sure you've not been following this thread.

Listen carefully. If the two of you are using the same method, and it results in no hits for such phrases as "World Trade Center", "Pentagon", "Dylan Avery" and "Loose Change", as Eromitlab has demonstrated, then we may conclude that this is not a valid method for finding out what Truthers are talking about on the Loose Change forums, since we know that these are subjects that they do discuss on those forums.

Do you understand now? Only I'm not sure it can be made any simpler.
 
Its what I did write. At no point did I say you quoted him so you did not have to deny quoting him.

It does not get easier than that JJ


Phew!

..and you don't have to deny telling me I took two quotes and conflated them into one quote.
 
Last edited:
Phew!

..and you don't have to deny telling me I took two quotes and conflated them into one quote.

Double fail, just keep digging. UBL did not say what you claimed he said. Get over it.

I did not say you conflated them into 1 quote. You did not write it as a quote and I did not claim it was a quote. Lie much?
 
Truthers deny Osama Bin Laden involvement in 9/11.

Maybe technically true, to whatever degree, but irrelevant.

The White House, or some friend of the administration, planned it. Not Osama Bin Laden.

They have figured much of this out with the paranoid's gift of numerology and anagrams, and other word games to reveal the hidden reality in words.

When the Obama Biden ticket enters the White house and become the new bad boys who will be behind the next 9/11, in Truther minds, how long will it be before they discover

Obama Biden - b + snl = Osama Bin Laden?

And then what happens? Do their heads explode?

In short, I have no intelligent thoughts on what they'll do, which is OK since it seems intelligent thoughts aren't the best kind to predict the behavior of Truthers.
 
It interesting that Osama bin Laden, when denying involvement in the attacks, pointed at a government within the US government as the likely place to find the 911 perpetrators.

So did the 'Lone Gunmen' in their pilot episode, which should tell you just how seriously I take your claims (eg not at all).
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom