No point if you continue to show a poor grasp of the written word.
You would probably just run away again when shown to be incorrect.
Lame excuses!
No point if you continue to show a poor grasp of the written word.
You would probably just run away again when shown to be incorrect.
Lame excuses!
Your methodology was debunked in the very post you're ostensibly replying to.
You need to move on to a different form of deceit: if possible one slightly less transparent, as this makes it more interesting for us.
If it's so transparent that I can debunk it with ease, it's pretty damn transparent.
Hey, TLB, let's have a look at what else returns 0 results when loosechangeforums is searched on Google, using your formatting.
World Trade Center
Pentagon
Dylan Avery
And the kicker...
Loose Change
(But to be fair, if you add .com to loosechangeforums in this one, you get one result. Guess what it is. Go on, guess.)
That emoticon is the closest thing I have to a facepalm.Or do you want me to start one in 7 days?
7 days is fine. Any time you like or never.
And also, I did not say you quoted UBL, I said you conflated his two quotes to say something he did not say. English impaired again?
Fail again
You said:
"You are conflicting the two quotes, from different parts of the interview, into one, to try and say something Bin Laden did not say."
(My bold)
I have not said you quoted him I said you conflated or conflicted two different quotes to attempt to say he said something he did not.
I don't think you've been following this thread.Wrong- I'm using eromitlab's method.
Lurkers, notice how assuming "loosechangeforums.com" was the root url of the site equals "deceit", while posting a clearly wrong claim about truthers with no sources is not only unchallenged, but defended.
This is the kind of "critical thinking" the JREF cultivates- i.e. the use of rhetorical devices, ridicule, and selective criticism to support the status quo's ideology.
I'm sure you've not been following this thread.That emoticon is the closest thing I have to a facepalm.
Dr Adequate and Eromitlab, please check the url in the hyperlink- again, I use Eromitlab's method.
I do understand that that is what you meant to write!
Its what I did write. At no point did I say you quoted him so you did not have to deny quoting him.
It does not get easier than that JJ
Phew!
..and you don't have to deny telling me I took two quotes and conflated them into one quote.
Phew!
..and you don't have to deny telling me I took two quotes and conflated them into one quote.
Truthers deny Osama Bin Laden involvement in 9/11.
Maybe technically true, to whatever degree, but irrelevant.
...
In short, I have no intelligent thoughts ...
It interesting that Osama bin Laden, when denying involvement in the attacks, pointed at a government within the US government as the likely place to find the 911 perpetrators.