I'm here since before this subforum was created, Sabretooth. I have participated in many threads on factual topics, and I know the players in this subforum inside out. Many of them don't deserve the slightest respect. The "tell us your theory" nonsense is an age old routine tactic here and done to everybody who dares to question even little aspects of the "OCT". And pretending that "nobody has done it before", in full knowledge that this is a lie, goes on to this day, as you have seen. They should know that it doesn't work with me, but they do it anyway because it's all they have and at least it makes people like you and dafydd think i'm running away from a genuine challenge. Same old, same old.
These days i'm mostly active in other parts of the forum and only come here to visit my old duhbunkie buddies when I see something interesting in the "new posts" list. In this thread I participate because Mackey had me fooled, too. And I really don't like getting fooled. He was my favorite debunker for some years.
Don't excuse you being childlike and petulant.I'm here since before this subforum was created, Sabretooth. I have participated in many threads on factual topics, and I know the players in this subforum inside out. Many of them don't deserve the slightest respect.
That's basic debating, not some kind of trick. If you claim to have a theory, why not post it and let it be criticized? It's like trying to play a poker game without letting anyone else see your cards; people are going to think you're cheating.The "tell us your theory" nonsense is an age old routine tactic here and done to everybody who dares to question even little aspects of the "OCT".
You are. They challenge you to produce a theory you claim you have, you BS about how you don't have to. Same old, same old.And pretending that "nobody has done it before", in full knowledge that this is a lie, goes on to this day, as you have seen. They should know that it doesn't work with me, but they do it anyway because it's all they have and at least it makes people like you and dafydd think i'm running away from a genuine challenge. Same old, same old.
How can one claim LIHOP while at the same time believing the plane flew over the Pentagon and landed at Reagan? While making it happen they let it happen? I just don't get it.
Show some guts and talk to me directly, Mackey. Tell me that my statement above is wrong and you started this rocket science challenge with open outcome. If you do so, i'll deliver something new and insightful.
I'm here since before this subforum was created, Sabretooth. I have participated in many threads on factual topics, and I know the players in this subforum inside out. Many of them don't deserve the slightest respect. The "tell us your theory" nonsense is an age old routine tactic here and done to everybody who dares to question even little aspects of the "OCT". And pretending that "nobody has done it before", in full knowledge that this is a lie, goes on to this day, as you have seen. They should know that it doesn't work with me, but they do it anyway because it's all they have and at least it makes people like you and dafydd think i'm running away from a genuine challenge. Same old, same old.
These days i'm mostly active in other parts of the forum and only come here to visit my old duhbunkie buddies when I see something interesting in the "new posts" list. In this thread I participate because Mackey had me fooled, too. And I really don't like getting fooled. He was my favorite debunker for some years.
For the record, I don't believe you. I don't believe you have a theory, hypothesis, story, etc...and if you do, you won't reveal it because you know it won't stand up in any factual debate. Calling it "feeding the debunkers" if that makes you feel better. But blurting out that "the LIHOP has been proven" and similar garbage filling statements and then refusing to back them up makes you look like a coward at best.
...And think about who you associate with.
Ok. Frankly, I don't care if you believe me or not, or what I look like you you. I was talking to Mackey and he knows what i'm talking about.
I'm not wading through 6 pages of long winded garbage. You want to make a point, you are going to have to gimme the crib notes.Here you can read about what I meant with the LIHOP part being proven.
On the Pentagon you can read here, where you'll find over 350 posts of mine.
Ok. Frankly, I don't care if you believe me or not, or what I look like you you. I was talking to Mackey and he knows what i'm talking about. Here you can read about what I meant with the LIHOP part being proven. On the Pentagon you can read here, where you'll find over 350 posts of mine. Have fun. And think about who you associate with.
When? Soon?... , i'll deliver something new and insightful.
paloalto makes up fiction about 911, lies. ? lol, you believe the moronic claptrap conclusions he makes up from his cut and paste nonsense? Go ahead take this to the FBI, or CBS, break the big news paloalto makes up fictional claims about 911. What a story.... Here you can read about what I meant with the LIHOP part being proven. ...
Flight 77 was not on a different flight path, the OP failed, CIT failed. CIT have no evidence. More lies. Did you fail to take this to the authorities too?... On the Pentagon you can read here, where you'll find over 350 posts of mine. Have fun. And think about who you associate with.
And think about who you associate with.

You have no posts on the first page of that thread.Here you can read about what I meant with the LIHOP part being proven.
To my knowledge, that allegation has not been "proven".The documents at the Moussaoui trial also show that the FBI HQ agents who shut down this FBI criminal investigation of Mihdhar and Hazmi knew full well that they were acting illegally to criminally obstruct this investigation, and knew that their criminal actions would allow the al Qaeda terrorists to murder thousands of Americans.
Ok. Frankly, I don't care if you believe me or not, or what I look like you you. I was talking to Mackey and he knows what i'm talking about. Here you can read about what I meant with the LIHOP part being proven. On the Pentagon you can read here, where you'll find over 350 posts of mine. Have fun. And think about who you associate with.
. And think about who you associate with.
Why do truthers always get so narky? Frustration that almost nobody takes them seriously?