Throwing some cannon fodder against a brick wall is not a counter-offensive.
Ah, the "no true counteroffensive" ploy
Somewhere upthread I listed a number of excuses that would be found to explain away the Ukrainian counteroffensive if and when it came about. I think a couple have already been ticked off.
You prayed for it since months, how they would "liberate" Kherson and Crimea and the Donbass, and even tried to mock me for telling you that it won't happen, and now "it" happened, and it was another slaughter of victims sent to the meat grinder because of the scum in Kiev and their masters. This is all senseless cruelty.
So it hasn't happened and it has happened at the same time ?
A counteroffensive doesn't have to be successful to exist, so which is it ?
Are the Russians lying about successfully repelling a Ukrainian counteroffensive ?
edited to add......
Here is the post I was remembering:
IMO even if Ukraine was able to launch a successful, large scale, counteroffensive, it would be handwaved away. Various reasons would be given, it's a strategic withdrawal by Russia, it's fake news and Russia still holds the area, it's not a counteroffensive - it's localised resistance that will soon be mopped up, it's not a Ukrainian counteroffensive - it's a NATO counteroffensive, it's just Poland invading.![]()
Last edited:
